Logical and gnoseological characteristics of the topic of scientific research
Degtyarev Sergei Ivanovich
Altai State Medical University
Submitted: 01.07.2024
Abstract. The purpose of the study is to identify the logical and epistemological nature and properties of the topic of scientific research as a form of organization and development of scientific knowledge. The article examines the problematic situation in the modern Russian theory of scientific cognition related to the interpretation of the concept of a topic, the stages of thematization, the place of problematization in it, the cognitive functions of the topic. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that a new concept of thematization as a dialectical and logical process of the development of scientific knowledge is proposed and rationally justified. As a result, it is revealed that the process of thematization begins with the analysis of an objective contradiction formed in practice, goes through the constitution of a scientific problem, the definition of an object and subject, the formulation of a research goal and ends with the synthesis of definitions of an object and subject and the formulation of a goal into a complex logical and epistemological form of the organization of scientific knowledge - the research topic.
Key words and phrases: тема научного исследования, теория научного познания, конституирование научной проблемы, постановка цели исследования, объект исследования, предмет и цель исследования, the topic of scientific research, the theory of scientific knowledge, the constitution of a scientific problem, setting the purpose of research, the object of research, the subject and purpose of research
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Ardashkin I. B. Ontologiya problemy: epistemologicheskii podkhod // Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2005. T. 308. № 1.
Degtyarev S. I. Predmet nauchnogo issledovaniya kak marker distsiplinarnoi prinadlezhnosti dissertatsionnoi raboty // Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v obrazovanii i meditsine. 2022. № 1.
Zabota ob istine. Beseda Mishelya Fuko s Fransua Eval'dom // Gumanitarnyi portal. 10.04.2007. https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/524?ysclid=lyftxoqdyp799770478
Mikulinskii S. R. Dzheral'd Kholton i ego kontseptsiya tematicheskogo analiza // Kholton Dzh. Tematicheskii analiz nauki / per. s angl. M.: Progress, 1981.
Morozova A. M., Kadykov V. A., Pel'tikhina O. V., Askerov E. M., Morozova A. D. O vozmozhnostyakh opredeleniya aktual'nosti temy nauchnogo issledovaniya // Sinergiya nauk. 2018. № 19.
Ruzavin G. I. Problemnaya situatsiya kak vyrazhenie protivorechiya v razvitii nauchnogo poznaniya // Protivorechie i diskurs / otv. red. I. A. Gerasimova. M.: IF RAN, 2005.
Teplykh M. S., Akhmetzyanova M. P. O mnogogrannosti ponyatii «problema» i «problematizatsiya» v filosofskom diskurse // Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. 2019. № 3.
Ulashchik V. S. Vybor temy nauchnykh issledovanii // Zdravookhranenie. 2014. № 7.
Khakuz P. M., Gura A. Yu. O soderzhanii ponyatiya «problematizatsiya» // Obshchestvo, filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura. 2016. № 11.
Kholton Dzh. Tematicheskii analiz nauki / per. s angl. M.: Progress, 1981.
Русский
