Aesthetic analysis of disgust: A historical-philosophical and a content-related aspect
Strugova Ekaterina Aleksandrovna
Saint Petersburg State University
Submitted: 09.02.2023
Abstract. The research aims to reveal the content side of disgust, which makes it possible to consider it an aesthetic reaction in a broad sense. The paper reviews content-oriented and axiological approaches to the study of disgust. The scientific novelty of the research lies in adding the criteria of underestimation, deformation and distance from potential objects of aesthetic pleasure to the minimal definition of the notion of disgust. As a result, it has been proved that the content side of disgust reflects the conflict of the subjective, objective factors of its analysis and instances of the disgusting in art and cinema, which provides an expanded interpretation of the reactivity of disgust.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Medvedev A. A. Estetizatsiya bezobraznogo v art-praktikakh postmoderna: diss. … k. filos. n. M., 2016.
Radeev A. E. Za novuyu estetiku, ili nazad k esteticheskomu opytu // Estetika i germenevtika: sbornik k 60-letiyu kafedry estetiki MGU: sb. st. vseros. nauch. konf. (g. Moskva, 11 dekabrya 2020 g.) / otv. red. E. A. Kondrat'ev. M.: MAKS Press, 2022.
Rozenkrants K. Estetika bezobraznogo // Estetika bezobraznogo Karla Rozenkrantsa / per. s nem. M. A. Shkepu. K.: Feniks, 2010.
Trushnikova T. V. Estetika otvratitel'nogo v kul'ture postmoderna // Novye tekhnologii – neftegazovomu regionu: mat. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh (g. Tyumen', 16-18 maya 2018 g.) / otv. red. P. V. Evtin. Tyumen': Izd-vo Tyumenskogo industrial'nogo universiteta, 2018.
Carroll N. Defending the content approach to aesthetic experience // Metaphilosophy. 2015. Vol. 46. Iss. 2.
Chamberlain R. The interplay of objective and subjective factors in empirical aesthetics // Human perception of visual information: Psychological and computational perspectives / ed. by B. Ionescu, W. A. Bainbridge, N. Murray. N. Y.: Springer, 2022.
Coate M. Nothing but nonsense: A Kantian account of ugliness // The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2018. Vol. 58. Iss. 1.
De Clercq R. Aesthetic pleasure explained // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 2019. Vol. 77. Iss. 2.
Feagin S. L. Monsters, disgust and fascination // Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 1992. Vol. 65. No. 1-2.
Hick D. H. Horror and its affects // The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 2022. Vol. 80. Iss. 2.
Hume D. Of tragedy // Essays: Moral, political, and literary / ed. by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1987.
Kant I. Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Kieran M. The vice of snobbery: Aesthetic knowledge, justification, and virtue in art appreciation // The Philosophical Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 60. No. 239.
King A. Reasons, normativity, and value in aesthetics // Philosophy Compass. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 1.
Korsmeyer C. Gut appreciation: Possibilities for aesthetic disgust // Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience. 2013. Vol. 3.
Lopes D. M. Two dogmas of aesthetic empiricism // Metaphilosophy. 2021. Vol. 52. Iss. 5.
Paris P. The deformity-related conception of ugliness // The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2017. Vol. 57. Iss. 2.
Peacocke A. Let’s be liberal: An alternative to aesthetic hedonism // British Journal of Aesthetics. 2021. Vol. 61. Iss. 2.
Shelley J. The default theory of aesthetic value // The British Journal of Aesthetics. 2019. Vol. 59. Iss. 1.
Sibley F. Some notes on ugliness // Approach to aesthetics / ed. by J. Benson, B. Redfern, J. R. Cox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
Van der Berg S. The motivational structure of appreciation // Philosophical Quarterly. 2019. Vol. 69. Iss. 276.
Русский
