Post-Industrial Society under Conditions of Digitalization
Pelevin Sergei Igorevich
Armavir State Pedagogical University
Submitted: 01.06.2020
Abstract. The paper aims to identify specificity of revolutionary technological transformations associated with digitalization processes. Scientific originality of the research lies in the fact that the author applies the categorial apparatus of modern social philosophy to study the dichotomy "industrial society" - "post-industrial society". The research methodology includes sociocultural, systemic and structural-functional approaches. The research findings are as follows: analysing the information society theory and the knowledge society theory, the author identifies their conceptual-methodological features and reveals their differences. The article substantiates the provision that when approaching a social problem, first of all it’s necessary to clarify the definitions of the key notions constituting its theoretical basis. Accordingly, the author analyses terminological fields of the concepts under study with a view to clarify the definitions of the key notions and to discover their interrelations.
Key words and phrases: постиндустриальное общество, классический модерн, индустриальное общество, общество знаний, информационное общество, post-industrial society, classical modernity, industrial society, knowledge society, information society
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Baklanov I. S., Balastrova K. N. Spetsifika tsennostnykh orientatsii v usloviyakh formirovaniya obshchestva znanii // Ekonomicheskie i gumanitarnye issledovaniya regionov. 2017. № 6. S. 66-69.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. M.: Academia, 1999. 783 s.
Grechkina E. N. Transgumanizm - mirovozzrenie XXI veka ili tsivilizatsionnaya ugroza chelovechestvu? // Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. № 8. S. 34-37.
Liotar Zh.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna / per. s fr. N. A. Shmatko. M. - SPb.: In-t eksperim. sotsiologii; Aleteiya, 1998. 160 s.
Mikeeva O. A. Postmodernizm i filosofiya rossiiskoi istorii // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2007. № 5 (36). S. 58-61.
Pelevin S. I. Rol' razvitiya tekhnologii v stanovlenii sovremennogo obshchestva kak tekhnogennoi tsivilizatsii // Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke. 2018. T. 7. № 6A. S. 101-108.
Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o moderne: dvenadtsat' lektsii. Izd-e 2-e, ispr. M.: Ves' Mir, 2008. 416 s.
Khaksli O. O divnyi novyi mir. M.: AST, 2010. 288 s.
Bell D. The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture of Social Forecasting. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1973. 618 p.
Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity / trans. F. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 430 p.
Lyotard J.-F. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge / trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979. 110 p.
Pelevin S. I., Taubaev B. D., Baklanov I. S. Problem of Technogenic Society Dynamics under the Conditions of Contemporaneity // International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 2018. Vol. 9. № 11. P. 2437-2443.
Volkov Y. G., Khunagov R. D., Imgrunt S. I., Kumykov A. M., Gribov D. Y. Images of ideology: Social and cognitive sense // International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016. Vol. 11. № 16. P. 9573-9585.
Русский
