Change of Educational Paradigm Due to E-Learning Technologies Implementation in Higher Education
Shirokolobova Anastasia Georgievna, Larionova Ulia Sergevna
The Siberian Institute of Management of "The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration"
Submitted: 02.12.2020
Abstract. The paper analyses changes in educational paradigm due to E-learning technologies introduction into higher technical education. The article considers teachers’ readiness for upcoming changes in educational paradigm. Two educational paradigms are compared: traditional and innovative, formed as a result of E-learning technologies introduction and tended to change roles and functions of higher education participants. Scientific originality of the study lies in the fact that the authors compare two educational paradigms and describe newly established roles and functions of educational process participants. The research findings are as follows: roles and functions of educational process participants under the conditions of higher education modernization are revealed; advantages of the innovative educational model over the traditional one are identified.
Key words and phrases: парадигма образования, учебный процесс, высшая школа, инновационная модель образования, студент технического вуза, Е-learning, educational paradigm, educational process, higher school, innovative educational model, technical student
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Al'kova L. A. Kriterii sformirovannosti IKT-kompetentsii lichnosti posredstvom T-tekhnologii // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2017. № 1 (62). S. 105-106.
Achkasova O. G. Formirovanie i razvitie tsifrovykh kompetentsii spetsialistov v ramkakh prezidentskoi programmy podgotovki upravlencheskikh kadrov Kuzbassa // Professional'noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2020. № 2 (38). S. 99-106.
Bugrova O. V. K voprosu opredeleniya ponyatiya "Informatsionnaya kompetentnost' uchitelya" // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 1 (213). S. 6-11.
Degil' I. M., Kostyukova T. A. Spetsifika raboty prepodavatelya vuza v elektronnoi obrazovatel'noi srede // Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie. 2016. № 3 (63). S. 5-10.
Dudina M. N. Novaya obrazovatel'naya paradigma: problemy kachestva obrazovaniya // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2006. № 5. S. 32-34.
Karyakin Yu. V. Novaya paradigma obrazovaniya // Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya. 2009. № 239. S. 39-43.
Ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Elektronnyi resurs]: Federal'nyi zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g. № 273-FZ. URL: http://www.edu.ru/abitur/act.30/index.php (data obrashcheniya: 15.02.2021).
Podol'skii O. V. Novye trebovaniya k kazhdomu cheloveku v realiyakh tsifrovoi ekonomiki [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://ntinews.ru/blog/interview/novye-trebovaniya-k-kazhdomu-cheloveku-v-realiyakh-tsifrovoy-ekonomiki.html (data obrashcheniya: 15.12.2020).
Tuneva N. V. Opyt primeneniya mobil'nykh tekhnologii na zanyatiyakh po angliiskomu yazyku // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty lingvooobrazovaniya: sbornik nauchnykh statei Mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Kemerovo, 27-28 maya 2018 g.) / pod red. L. S. Znikinoi. Kemerovo: KuzGTU, 2018. S. 148-154.
Khmelidze I. N. Rol' prepodavatelya v realizatsii elektronnogo obucheniya // Otkrytoe i distantsionnoe obrazovanie. 2014. № 4 (56). S. 45-48.
Shirokolobova A. G., Larionova Yu. S., Berezina A. S. Ispol'zovanie tekhnologii E-learning v organizatsii samostoyatel'noi raboty po inostrannomu yazyku studentov zaochnoi formy obucheniya // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2019. T. 12. № 3. S. 353-358.
Badia A., Garcia C., Meneses J. Approaches to teaching online: Exploring factors influencing teachers in a fully online university // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2017. № 48 (6). R. 1193-1207.
Berge Z. L. Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field // Educational Technology. 2002. № 35 (1). P. 22-30.
Clark R. C., Mayer R. E. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. 4th ed. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2016. 528 p.
Huang Q. Examining Teachers’ Roles in Online Learning // The EUROCALL Review. 2018. Vol. 26. № 2. DOI: 10.4995/eurocall.2018.9139.
Izadinia M. A closer look at the role of mentor teachers in shaping pre-service teachers’ professional identity // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2015. № 52. P. 1-10.
Mart?nez Cartas L. Using an improved virtual learning environment for engineering students // European Journal of Engineering Education. 2012. Vol. 37. Iss. 3. P. 229-241. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2012.678985.
Rice W. Moodle E-Learning Course Development: A complete guide to successful learning using Moodle. Birmingham: Packt Publishing, 2011. 344 p.
Sackville A., Sherratt C., Martin L., Schofield M., Davey J., Kruger S. Designing for Difference: An exploration of the cultural differences between face-to-face and online learning // Proceedings of the 31st Improving University Teaching Conference. Dunedin, New Zealand, 2006. R. 8-12.
Spector J. M., Teja I. Competencies for Online Teaching // ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. 2001. P. 1-11.
Русский
