Formative Assessment as a Technique to Develop Schoolchildren’s Educational Autonomy
Shapovalova Ol'ga Nikolaevna, Efremova Nadezhda Fedorovna
School № 97
Don State Technical University
Submitted: 28.01.2020
Abstract. The article discusses conceptual principles and a didactic potential of alternative assessment, in particular, formative assessment aimed to develop learners’ educational autonomy. Advantages and shortcomings of summative and formative approaches to assessment are identified. Foreign and domestic methodologies to develop learners’ educational autonomy are compared. The experiment results testify the efficiency of the formative assessment technique in achieving meta-subject results at secondary school Biology lessons.
Key words and phrases: метапредметные результаты, учебная самостоятельность, контрольно-оценочная деятельность, альтернативные методы оценивания, формирующее оценивание, суммативное оценивание, общее образование, meta-subject results, educational autonomy, assessment activity, alternative assessment techniques, formative assessment, summative assessment, general education
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Asmolov A. G., Burmenskaya G. V., Volodarskaya I. A. i dr. Formirovanie universal'nykh uchebnykh deistvii v osnovnoi shkole: ot deistviya k mysli. Sistema zadanii: posobie dlya uchitelya / pod red. A. G. Asmolova. M.: Prosveshchenie, 2011. 159 s.
Bermus A. G. Metodologiya modernizatsii obrazovaniya: opyt osmysleniya // Credo new. 2008. № 1.
Boitsova E. G. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie obrazovatel'nykh rezul'tatov uchashchikhsya v sovremennoi shkole // Chelovek i obrazovanie. 2014. № 1. C. 171-175.
Gruzdeva E. L. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie na urokakh biologii // Pedagogicheskaya masterskaya. Vse dlya uchitelya! 2016. № 2 (62). S. 5-8.
Efremova N. F. Garantiya kachestva kompetentnostnogo obucheniya v nadezhnosti otsenki dostizhenii obuchayushchikhsya // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2014. № 11. S. 1161-1166.
Efremova N. F. Uchebnye dostizheniya kak ob"ekt testirovaniya i pokazatel' kachestva v obrazovanii // Voprosy testirovaniya v obrazovanii. 2004. № 9. S. 39-50.
Zatsepina T. V. Tekhnologiya problemnogo obucheniya na urokakh biologii // Pedagogicheskie praktiki ispol'zovaniya effektivnykh form i metodov raboty s uchashchimisya v obrazovatel'nykh organizatsiyakh Lipetskoi oblasti, realizuyushchikh programmy perekhoda shkol v effektivnyi rezhim funktsionirovaniya / pod red. N. B. Zhesterevoi, L. I. Neplyuevoi. Lipetsk: IRO, 2018. S. 89-101.
Zemlyanskaya E. N. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie (otsenka dlya obucheniya) obrazovatel'nykh dostizhenii obuchayushchikhsya // Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 2016. T. 5. № 3. S. 50-58.
Ignatovich S. S., Ignatovich V. K., Galushko I. G. Obrazovatel'naya samostoyatel'nost' sovremennykh starsheklassnikov: opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2016. № 3 (15). S. 34-43. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2016.3186.
Ignat'eva E. Yu. Otsenivanie obrazovatel'nykh rezul'tatov shkol'nikov kak obuchayushchaya strategiya // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2018. Vyp. 3 (23). S. 71-83. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2018.4067.
Il'yazova L. M., Druzhinina A. V. Ispol'zovanie formiruyushchego otsenivaniya na urokakh khimii // Nauchnoe obozrenie. Pedagogicheskie nauki. 2018. № 5. S. 19-23.
Kachakova O. A. Metapredmetnaya napravlennost' uroka biologii - osnova razvitiya individual'nykh poznavatel'nykh sistem shkol'nika [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://urok.1sept.ru/stat'i/643649/ (data obrashcheniya: 27.01.2020).
Kladova I. S. Razvitie samoreguliruemogo obucheniya v protsesse obucheniya pis'mennomu vyskazyvaniyu na urokakh angliiskogo yazyka // Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. 2017. № 7. S. 89-95.
Kornilova A. A., Gurbich A. V. Vnedrenie kriterial'noi sistemy otsenivaniya uchebnykh dostizhenii uchashchikhsya na uroke biologii v 9 klasse // European Science. 2017. № 9 (31). S. 44-48.
Kosikova S. V., Kosolapova L. A. Nepreryvnost' razvitiya uchebnoi samostoyatel'nosti shkol'nika kak kriterii preemstvennosti obrazovatel'noi sistemy shkoly // Pedagogika i psikhologiya obrazovaniya. 2019. № 1. S. 58-70.
Nilova N. V. Ispol'zovanie priemov formiruyushchego otsenivaniya dlya razvitiya UUD shkol'nikov na urokakh biologii // Sovremennye problemy meditsiny i estestvennykh nauk: sb. statei Vseros. nauch. konferentsii (g. Ioshkar-Ola, 24-28 aprelya 2017 g.). Ioshkar-Ola: STRING, 2017. Vyp. 6. S. 310-314.
Orzhekovskii P. A., Stepanov S. Yu., Mishina I. B. O nepreryvnosti otsenki razvitiya u obuchayushchikhsya reproduktivnykh i kreativnykh myslitel'nykh deistvii // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. 2019. Vyp. 3 (27). S. 28-39. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2019.4964.
Osadchuk O. L. Didakticheskaya model' samoreguliruemogo obucheniya // Obrazovanie i nauka. 2008. № 8 (56). S. 3-11.
Petrova O. V., Kuznetsova V. A. Formiruyushchee i summativnoe otsenivanie kak psikhologo-pedagogicheskoe uslovie diagnostiki sformirovannosti lichnostnykh rezul'tatov // Nauchno-metodicheskoe obespechenie otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya. 2018. № 2 (5). S. 75-81.
Prodanova N. V. Formy pedagogicheskogo otsenivaniya i ikh effekty // Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi pedagogiki: mat-ly VI Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Ufa, mart 2015 g.). Ufa: Leto, 2015. S. 13-15.
Stashko T. E. Primenenie formiruyushchego otsenivaniya na zanyatiyakh biologii v usloviyakh srednego professional'nogo obrazovaniya // Sovremennoe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom: teoriya, metodika i praktika: mat-ly III Mezhd. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Cheboksary, 24 sent. 2014 g.) / red. O. N. Shirokov i dr. Cheboksary: Interaktiv plyus, 2014. S. 166-167.
Fedoseev A. A. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie: pristal'nyi vzglyad // Novye informatsionnye tekhnologii v obrazovanii i nauke. 2018. Vyp. 1. S. 83-85.
Chetvertnykh T. V. Formiruyushchee otsenivanie i ego vliyanie na lichnostnye obrazovatel'nye rezul'taty obuchayushchikhsya // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2018. № 2 (26). S. 304-312.
Ambrose S. A., Bridges M. W., Lovett M. C. et al. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010. 328 p.
Brown G., Bull J., Pendlebury M. Assessing student learning in higher education. L.: Routledge, 1997. 321 p.
Danso J. Developing students’ independent skills through the use of assessment for learning strategies: How does this affect engagement? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:de5086c1-87da-4800-856a-3f6b28efbf61 (data obrashcheniya: 27.01.2020).
Heritage M. Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44838241_Formative_Assessment_What_Do_Teachers_Need_to_Know_and_Do (data obrashcheniya: 27.01.2020).
Kulasegaram K., Rangachari P. K. Beyond "formative": Assessments to enrich student learning // Advances in Physiology Education. 2018. № 42. P. 5-14. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00122.2017.
Sadler D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00117714 (data obrashcheniya: 27.01.2020).
Siegesmund A. Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://academic.oup.com/femsle/article/364/11/fnx096/3814095 (data obrashcheniya: 27.01.2020).
Wong I. L. Developing independent learning skills for postgraduate students through blended learning environments // Journal of Cases on Information Technology. 2013. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 36-50.
Zimmerman B. J., Bonner S., Kovach R. Developing Self-Regulated Learners. Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1996. 147 p.
Русский
