Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 6. Part 2. P. 198-201.
CRITERIA OF ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF EXAMINATION OF CIRCUMSTANCES OF CRIMINAL CASE: MODERN APPROACHES
Chepik Marina Mikhailovna
Far Eastern Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Abstract. The article analyses the content of the notions "comprehensiveness", "completeness" and "objectivity" as criteria of the assessment of the quality of the examination of the circumstances of the criminal case. On the basis of the norms of the effective Criminal-Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and law enforcement practice the author comes to the conclusion that to date the basic, similar to the criteria under consideration ones are not worked out. Their lack against the background of the never-ending changes of criminal-procedural law makes necessary to work out the alternative criteria of assessment or the return of the prior requirements of comprehensiveness, completeness and objectivity into the Criminal-Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.
Key words and phrases: критерии оценки качества, исследование обстоятельств уголовного дела, эффективность, всесторонность, полнота, объективность, компромисс, criteria of quality assessment, examination of circumstances of criminal case, efficiency, comprehensiveness, completeness, objectivity, compromise
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Adamenko V. D. Rasprostranennost' printsipa vsestoronnosti, polnoty i ob"ektivnosti kak uslovie poyavleniya i sushchestvovaniya zashchity obvinyaemogo // Aktual'nye voprosy gosudarstva i prava na sovremennom etape. Tomsk, 1984. S. 203-294.
Akhmadullin A. S. Vsestoronnost', polnota i ob"ektivnost' v dosudebnykh stadiyakh rossiiskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 2006. 186 c.
Bakhta A. S. Kompromissy v ugolovnom protsesse // Vestnik Dal'nevostochnogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 1 (26). S. 3-8.
Bakhta A. S. Polnota predvaritel'nogo i sudebnogo sledstviya. Omsk, 1997. 108 s.
Burdanova V. S. Kriminalisticheskie problemy obespecheniya vsestoronnosti, polnoty i ob"ektivnosti rassledovaniya prestuplenii: diss. … d.yu.n. M., 1992. 48 s.
Dobrovol'skaya T. N., Raginskii M. Yu. Printsip zakonnosti v deyatel'nosti sledovatelya organov vnutrennikh del. Volgograd, 1976. 72 s.
Zakhozhii L. A. Osushchestvlenie printsipa vsestoronnosti, polnoty i ob"ektivnosti issledovaniya dela na predvaritel'nom sledstvii: avtoref. diss. … k.yu.n. M., 1967. 15 c.
Karetnikov A. S. Odnostoronnost', nepolnota i neob"ektivnost' rassledovaniya kak osnovanie vozvrashcheniya del na dopolnitel'noe rassledovanie // Voprosy yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti i deyatel'nost' organov vnutrennikh del. Volgograd, 1978. S. 116-121.
Lupinskaya P. A. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M., 1998. 696 s.
Nekenova S. B. Obespechenie prava na razumnyi srok ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Kalmytskogo universiteta. 2013. № 1 (17). S. 113-117.
Nikolaichik N. I., Matvienko E. A. Vsestoronnost', polnota i ob"ektivnost' predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. Minsk, 1969. 192 c.
Pitertsev S. K. Novyi vzglyad na rol' kategorii vsestoronnosti, polnoty i ob"ektivnosti v upravlenii rassledovaniem prestuplenii // Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo yuridicheskogo instituta General'noi prokuratury RF. 2002. № 4. S. 38-43.
Smelkov I. UPK - ne krasavitsa, chtoby vsem nravit'sya, ili Femida dolzhna prozret' // Militsiya. 2003. № 8. S. 12-18.
Solov'ev A. D. Vsestoronnost', polnota i ob"ektivnost' predvaritel'nogo sledstviya. Kiev, 1969. 139 c.
Русский
