Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 5. Part 2. P. 43-45.
Gauzhaeva Viktoriya Aleksandrovna
North-Caucasian Institute for Advanced Training (Branch) of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Abstract. The article considers the legislative regulation of assigning and performing forensic examination on the criminal case, including before its institution; the comparative-legal analysis of the degree and necessity of consolidating the procedural terms of forensic examination performance is carried out; propositions on changing the current legislation, which concern the ascertainment of the maximum term of examination performance and the peculiarities of interaction between the person, who conducts investigation, and the expert while determining the term of examination performance, are formulated.
Key words and phrases: судебная экспертиза, процессуальный срок, эксперт, специальные познания, возбуждение уголовного дела, forensic examination, procedural term, expert, special knowledge, criminal case institution
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Vetyul A. A. Problemy ustanovleniya srokov proizvodstva ekspertiz v gosudarstvennykh ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh i puti ikh resheniya // Izvestiya Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii. 2007. № 1. S. 62-65.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 № 138-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii (SZRF). 2002. № 46. St. 4532.
Danil'yan N. A. O razumnykh srokakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v kontekste proizvodstva sudebnoi ekspertizy // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2011. № 4. S. 143-147.
Dronova E. V., Kon'shina Ya. A. Naznachenie ekspertizy i zaderzhanie v khode proverki zayavleniya o prestuplenii // Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2012. № 10. S. 59-61.
Manukyan A. R., Gutieva I. G. Problemnye voprosy kriminalisticheskoi kharakteristiki informatsionnogo terrorizma // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2014. № 16. S. 132-134.
O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii i priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel'nykh polozhenii zakonodatel'nykh aktov Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosam okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 25.11.2013 № 317-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2014) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2013. 27 noyabrya.
O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 04.03.2013 № 23-FZ // SZRF. 2013. № 9. St. 875.
O gosudarstvennoi sudebno-ekspertnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 31.05.2001 № 73-FZ (red. ot 25.11.2013) // SZRF. 2001. № 23. St. 2291.
O nekotorykh voprosakh praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zakonodatel'stva ob ekspertize: Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 04.04.2014 № 23 // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF. 2014. № 6.
O sudebnoi ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda № 28 ot 21.12.2010 // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2011. № 2.
O sudebno-ekspertnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (red., prinyataya GD FS RF v I chtenii 20.11.2013) [Elektronnyi resurs]: Proekt Federal'nogo zakona № 306504-6. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/ online.cgi?req=doc;base=PRJ;n=112611 (data obrashcheniya: 29.03.2015).
Sakhnova T. V. Sudebnaya ekspertiza. M.: Gorodets, 2000. 368 s.
Sementsov V. A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nekotorye sovremennye problemy // Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 4 (31). S. 114-121.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 №174-FZ (red. ot 03.02.2015) // SZRF. 2001. № 52. Ch. I. St. 4921.
Kharzinova V. M. Aktual'nye problemy primeneniya protsessual'nykh srokov // Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. 2013. № 10 (28). S. 183-185.