GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art.
Issues of Theory and Practice
. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 4. Part 1. P. 81-85.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

GNOSEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AUTOPOIESIS CONCEPTION BY H. MATURANA AND F. VARELA

Kolesova Ol'ga Valentinovna
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod


Abstract. The article analyzes the gnoseological significance of the conception by H. Maturana and F. Varela. The basic characteristics of the notion "autopoiesis" are revealed. The structural analysis of the autopoiesic systems of four orders is conducted. Vertical connections between them, providing the commonness of structures, are ascertained. The specificity of the systems of different orders is represented as horizontal connections within them. The phenomenon of cognition and structural coupling are shown as two sides of the same process. The article substantiates the understanding of autopoiesis from the standpoint of onto-gnoseological approach.
Key words and phrases: аутопоэз, аутопоэзная динамика, структурный дрейф, структурное сопряжение, трофаллаксис, лингваллаксис, наблюдатель, autopoiesis, autopoiesic dynamics, structural drift, structural coupling, trophallaxis, linguistic trophallaxis, observer
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Bol'tsano B. Uchenie o nauke (izbrannoe). SPb.: Nauka, 2003. 518 s.
  2. Bukin D. N. Sovremennyi konstruktivizm i ontologicheskie osnovaniya matematiki // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 10. S. 50-57.
  3. Viko Dzh. Osnovaniya novoi nauki ob obshchei prirode natsii. M.: Direkt-Media, 2007. 998 s.
  4. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. M.: Mysl', 1994. 591 s.
  5. Kezin A. V. Radikal'nyi konstruktivizm: poznanie v "peshchere" // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 2004. Ser. 7. Filosofiya. № 4. S. 3-24.
  6. Maturana U., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2001. 223 s.
  7. Rebeshchenkova I. G. Problemy poznaniya v radikal'nom konstruktivizme. Kognitivnaya neirobiologiya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. № 2 (10). S. 54-63.
  8. Chertkova E. L. Sotsial'nyi konstruktivizm i sotsial'noe konstruirovanie // Konstruktivizm v teorii poznaniya. M.: IFRAN, 2008. S. 117-132.
  9. Yum D. Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode. M.: Kanon+, 1995. Kn. 1. O poznanii. 483 s.
  10. http://www.fund-intent.ru/Article/Show/455 (data obrashcheniya: 13.06.2014).
  11. http://www.synergetic.ru/autopoiesis/konstruktivistskaa-epistemologia-zh-piazhe.html (data obrashcheniya: 22.01.2015).

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru