Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 2. Part 2. P. 121-124.
OPTIMIZATION OF JUDICIAL AND EXPERT ACTIVITY IN RUSSIA: CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT
Latypov Vadim Sagit'yanovich
Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Abstract. In the article the analysis of the procedural legislation of Russia regulating judicial and expert activity is carried out, certain existing problems and ways of their solution are pointed. The necessity of the procedural fixation of the head of the judicial and expert organization in the capacity of other participant of criminal legal proceedings as an independent, full-fledged subject of criminal trial is revealed and grounded. On the basis of the conducted research the author suggests amending Chapter 8 of the Criminal Procedural Code with an additional norm, which provides the legal status of the head of the judicial and expert organization, its definition is given, the basic rights, duty, responsibility and guarantees of safety ensuring inherent in any participant of criminal trial are formulated.
Key words and phrases: уголовный процесс, руководитель судебно-экспертной организации, участник процесса, обеспечение безопасности, судебно-экспертная деятельность, иные участники уголовного судопроизводства, эксперт, criminal procedure, head of judicial and expert organization, trial participant, safety ensuring, judicial and expert activity, other participants of criminal legal proceedings, expert
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aminev F. G. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya sudebno-ekspertnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Byulleten' Mezhdunarodnoi assotsiatsii sodeistviya pravosudiyu: nauchnoe izdanie. 2013. № 1. S. 6-9.
Zaitseva E. A. Kontseptsiya razvitiya instituta sudebnoi ekspertizy v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M.: Yurlitinform, 2010. 424 s.
Latypov V. S. Genezis uchastiya inykh sub"ektov v otechestvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (na primere eksperta i spetsialista) // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva. 2013. № 2 (78). S. 79-86.
Latypov V. S. Inye sub"ekty (uchastniki) ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva s neopredelennym pravovym statusom // Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2014. № 2 (36). S. 161-165.
Latypov V. S. Sekretar' sudebnogo zasedaniya kak inoi uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 2 (36). S. 132-134.
O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 4 marta 2013 goda № 23-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'st-va RF (SZRF). 2013. № 9. St. 875.
O gosudarstvennoi zashchite poterpevshikh, svidetelei i inykh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Federal'nyi zakon ot 20 avgusta 2004 goda № 119-FZ // SZRF. 2004. № 34. St. 3534.
O gosudarstvennoi sudebno-ekspertnoi deyatel'nosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Federal'nyi zakon ot 31 maya 2001 goda № 73-FZ // SZRF. 2001. № 23. St. 2291.
O sudebnoi ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2010 № 28 // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2011. № 2.
Salakhova Zh. V., Latypov V. S. Statist kak inoi sub"ekt (uchastnik) ugolovno-protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 6 (32). Ch. 1. S. 151-153.
Tarasov A. A. Ob uchastii storony zashchity v naznachenii i proizvodstve ekspertizy po ugolovnym delam // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Samara, 2005. S. 29-40.
Tarasov A. A. Ekspert i spetsialist v ugolovnom protsesse Rossii: monografiya. Ufa: RITs BashGU, 2014. 184 s.
Tumanov G., Khamraev V. Za Ugolovnyi kodeks vvodyat vsenarodnuyu otvetstvennost' // Kommersant'. 2014. 2 oktyabrya.
Русский
