Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2015. № 1. Part 1. P. 21-23.
Beresneva Natal'ya Irikovna, Mishlanova Svetlana Leonidovna, Goleva Elena Olegovna
Perm State National Research University
Abstract. Attempts to represent the language of science as "ideal", "universal", "philosophical" for the consistent and unambiguous recording of scientific truth and broadening the sphere of cognition proved to be unsuccessful since they don’t consider the specifics of cognitive process: its paradoxicality. Metaphor is one of relevant means to represent paradox. Projecting an "ideal" language of science is impossible taking no account of the mechanisms of metaphorization and must include metaphorical modeling.
Key words and phrases: научное познание, "идеальный" язык, язык науки, парадокс, метафора, scientific cognition, "ideal" language, language of science, paradox, metaphor
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Baranov A. N., Karaulov Yu. N. Russkaya politicheskaya metafora: materialy k slovaryu. M.: In-t russkogo yazyka AN SSSR, 1991. 193 s.
Beresneva N. I., Mishlanova S. L. Problemy proektirovaniya yazyka kak ideal'nogo sredstva poznaniya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Rossiiskaya i zarubezhnaya filologiya. Perm', 2010. Vyp. 5. S. 23-30.
Beresneva N. I., Mishlanova S. L. Yazyk kak "ideal'noe" sredstvo poznaniya // Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2011. № 1-1. S. 33-38.
Geizenberg V. Yazyk i real'nost' v sovremennoi fizike // Geizenberg V. Fizika i filosofiya. Chast' i tseloe. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 104-118.
Kassirer E. Sila metafory // Teoriya metafory. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 33-44.
Kubryakova E. S., Dem'yankov V. Z., Pankrats Yu. G., Luzina L. G. Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov / pod obshch. red. E. S. Kubryakovoi. M.: Izd-vo filol. fak. MGU, 1997. 197 s.
Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem // Teoriya metafory. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 387-415.
Markov B. V. Znaki bytiya. SPb.: Nauka, 2001. 568 s.
Mishankina N. A. Metafora v nauke: paradoks ili norma? Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2010. 282 s.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Dve velikie metafory // Teoriya metafory. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 68-82.
Rassel B. Chelovecheskoe poznanie: ego sfera i granitsy. M.: TERRA-Knizhnyi klub; Respublika, 2000. 464 s.
Smirnova E. D. O chem govoryat paradoksy: ikh rol' v poznavatel'noi deyatel'nosti // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. № 6. S. 55-66.
Surovtsev V. A., Syrov V. N. Yazykovaya igra i rol' metafory v nauchnom poznanii [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/surovtsev/syrov.html (data obrashcheniya: 18.08.2014).
Sukhotin A. K. Paradoksy nauki [Elektronnyi resurs]. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2012. URL: http://vzms.org/suhot.htm (data obrashcheniya: 18.08.2014).
Русский
