Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2014. № 12. Part 2. P. 151-155.
GROUNDS AND LIMITS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCHES APPLICATION IN JURISPRUDENCE
Ponochevnyi Maksim Anatol'evich
Southern Federal University, Taganrog
Abstract. The article analyzes the validity and limits of interdisciplinary researches application in the science of law. Particular attention is paid to the detailed analysis of arguments in favor and against interdisciplinary researches in jurisprudence. The limits and valid format of interdisciplinary researches conduction in jurisprudence are considered taking into account modern epistemological and methodological grounds. The analysis of current researches on the topical theoretical problem is carried out.
Key words and phrases: междисциплинарные исследования, правовая наука, исследования в праве, методы правовой науки, interdisciplinary researches, legal science, researches in law, methods of legal science
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Antonov M. V. Sotsiologicheskie motivy ucheniya o prave Gansa Kel'zena // Yuridicheskii pozitivizm i konkurentsiya teorii prava: istoriya i sovremennost' (k 100-letiyu so dnya smerti G. F. Shershenevicha): materialy VI ezhegodnoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Ivanovo, 5-8 oktyabrya 2012 g.): v 3-kh ch. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. un-t, 2012. Ch. 1.
Voronina N. F. Predely sudeiskogo usmotreniya pri postanovlenii opravdatel'nogo prigovora sudom prisyazhnykh [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.ugpr.ru/arhiv/8_avg_2005/topic86_predely_sudeiskogo_usmotreniya_pri_postanovlenii_ opravdatelnogo_prigovora_sudom_prisyajnyh.html (data obrashcheniya: 25.08.14).
Klochkov V. V. Znanie i nevezhestvo v yuridicheskoi nauke // Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal'nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2008. № 10 (87). S. 144-151.
Krylova N., Serebrennikova A. Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran (Anglii, SShA, Frantsii i Germanii). M., 1998. 201 s.
Perlov A. M. Istoriya nauki: vvedenie v metodologiyu gumanitarnogo znaniya. M., 2007. 312 s.
Chistoe uchenie o prave Gansa Kel'zena: sbornik perevodov. M., 1987. Vyp. 1.
Shtraus L. Estestvennoe pravo i istoriya. M: Vodolei Publishers, 2007. 312 s.
Green M. S. Hans Kelsen and the Logic of Legal Systems // Alabama Law Review. 2003. Vol. 54. № 2. R. 365-413.
Schrama W. M. How to Carry out Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Some Experiences with an Interdisciplinary Research Method // Utrecht Law Review. 2011. № 1. R. 147-162.
Siems M. Legal Origins: Reconciling Law & Finance and Comparative Law // McGill Law Journal. 2007. Vol. 52. № 1. R. 55-81.
Siems M. The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way out of Desert [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1146162 (data obrashcheniya: 10.12.13).
Van Klink B., Taekema S. A Dynamic Model of Interdisciplinarity. Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research into Law // Tilburg Working Paper Series on Jurisprudence and Legal History. 2008. № 08-02. R. 1-29.
Vick D. W. Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law // Journal of Law and Society. 2004. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 163-193.
Русский
