Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 8. Part 1. P. 96-99.
MODERN RESEARCHES OF PROSPECTS FOR NON-CLASSICAL LOGIC METHODS APPLICATION IN PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY AND ARGUMENTATION
Zalenskaya Natal'ya Samuilovna
Technological College № 28, Moscow
Abstract. The author presents the survey of modern researchers’ views on the tendencies of the development of philosophical argumentation forms and methods based on the principles of non-classical logic, considers the collision of polar research positions in defining the subject matter of logic and its status, and as a result of the conducted analysis concludes the following: the nature of logical constructs within the framework of quantum logic is dialectical, and possibly requires deviation from the traditional consideration of philosophical argumentation as an evidence-based process.
Key words and phrases: неклассическая логика, логические методы, философская логика, современные исследования, философская аргументация, non-classical logic, logical methods, philosophical logic, modern researches, philosophical argumentation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Vasil'ev N. A. O chastnykh suzhdeniyakh, o treugol'nike protivopolozhnostei, o zakone isklyuchennogo chetvertogo. Kazan', 1910.
Zaitsev D. V. Filosofskaya logika i argumentatsiya [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.polygnozis.ru/default (data obrashcheniya: 04.03.2013).
Ivin A. A. Logika: uchebnoe posobie. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Znanie, 1998.
Kagan E. V. Nechetkost' kvantovogo soznaniya: opyt realizatsii ANIMAT [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-44543.html (data obrashcheniya: 02.06.2013).
Karpenko A. S. Logika na rubezhe tysyacheletiya [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://elib.org.ua/philosophy/ua_show_archives.php?subaction=showfull&id=1107274875&archive=1208465572&start_from=&ucat=1& (data obrashcheniya: 18.06.2013).
Moiseev V. I. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki. Voronezh: EK-Nauka, 2005. 239 s.
Khintikka Ya. Deistvitel'no li logika – klyuch ko vsyakomu khoroshemu rassuzhdeniyu? // Voprosy filosofii. 2000. № 11. S. 105-125.
Birkhoff G., Neumann J. von. The Logic of Quantum Mechanics // Annals of Mathematics. 1936. Vol. 37. P. 823-843.
Blum M. E. Continuity, Quantum, Continuum, and Dialectic: the Foundational Logics of Western Historical Thinking. N. Y.: Peter Lung Publishing, 2006. 499 p.
Brouwer L. E. J. De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes // Tijdskrift. Wijsbegeerte, 1908. Vol. 2.
Harman G. Internal Critique: a Logic Is not a Theory of Reasoning and a Theory of Reasoning Is not a Logic // Handbook of the Logic of Argument and Inference (Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning) / D. M. Gabbay. North Holland, 2002. 496 p.
Kreinovich V., Kohout L. J., Kim E. Square Root of NOT: a Major Difference between Fuzzy and Quantum Logics [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.cs.utep.edu/vladik/2008/tr08-10.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 10.07.2013).
Lukasiewicz J. Die logischen Grundlagen der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Krakow, 1913.
Lukasiewicz J. O zasadzie sprecznosci u Arystotelesa. Krakow, 1910.
Русский
