Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 8. Part 1. P. 78-82.
CRIME CATEGORY CHANGE: PROBLEMS AND CONTRADICTIONS
Dzhagrunov Arslan Anatol'evich
South-Russian Institute (Branch) of Russian Academy of National Economy and State Service under the Russian Federation President
Abstract. The author presents the scientific analysis of one of the new statutes of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, namely the new version of Article 15 "Category of Crimes", pays particular attention to the critical analysis of Part 6 of the mentioned article, which gives the court the right to change the category of crime from the point of view of compliance with the principle of justice, the goals of punishment, taking into account comments made by some scientists, and comes to the conclusion that the practical application of Part 6 of Article 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation may make it difficult to perform the requirements of the court to prescribe just punishment.
Key words and phrases: категория преступления, дифференциация наказания, принцип справедливости, цели наказания, судебный приговор, category of crime, differentiation of punishment, principle of justice, purposes of punishment, court verdict
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
Gorbatova M., Rusman G. Izmenenie kategorii prestupleniya: problemy pravoprimeneniya i obratnaya sila ugolovnogo zakona // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 5. S. 43-45.
Grinenko A. Kategorizatsiya prestuplenii i polozheniya Obshchei chasti Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF v svete gumanizatsii zakonodatel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 5. S. 46-49.
Zhuravlev M. Nekotorye voprosy ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya v svete sovremennoi rossiiskoi ugolovnoi politiki // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 5. S. 20-25.
Kibal'nik A. K chemu privedet "gumanizatsiya" ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva? [Elektronnyi resurs] // Zakonnost'. 2011. № 9. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Kurinova Ya. I. "Gumannost'" osvobozhdeniya ot nakazaniya i sovremennaya kriminal'naya real'nost' [Elektronnyi resurs] // Zakonnost'. 2012. № 4. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Malkov V. P. Kharakter i stepen' obshchestvennoi opasnosti prestupleniya v sisteme obshchikh nachal naznacheniya nakazaniya // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 9. S. 41-45.
Materialy godovogo statisticheskogo otcheta o rabote Pervomaiskogo raionnogo suda g. Rostova-na-Donu za 2012 god. Naryad № 04-02. 265 s.
Myasnikov A. A. Obstoyatel'stva, smyagchayushchie nakazanie: problemy sistematizatsii i osobennosti ucheta // Rossiiskoe pravosudie. 2011. № 1. S. 77-85.
Naumov A. O ser'eznoi uyazvimosti odnogo iz poslednikh zakonoproektov o vnesenii popravok v UK RF // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. № 1. S. 37-40.
O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiiskoi Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 2 ot 11.01.2007 goda // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2007. № 4. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Pitetskii V. V. Novye pravila ustanovleniya kategorii prestuplenii i printsip spravedlivosti // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2012. № 3. S. 47-49.