Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 6. Part 2. P. 203-210.
HYBRID POLITICAL REGIME CONCEPT IN modern POLITICAL SCIENCE AS ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE RUSSIAN POLICY ANALYSIS
Shakirova El'vira Venerovna
Ufa State Oil Technical University
Abstract. The author, basing on the analysis of the basic concepts and classifications of modern political regimes, suggests a coding system that allows revealing the main differences between the hybrid types of regimes, tells that her approach is based on six criteria that estimate the nature of the interaction between political elites and counter-elites, and concludes that the developed criteria for estimating political regimes may serve as a promising analytical framework of the analysis of the current political process in Russia.
Key words and phrases: гибридный политический режим, демократия, авторитаризм, дефектная демократия, конкурентный авторитаризм, контрэлита, политическая оппозиция, hybrid political regime, democracy, authoritarianism, defective democracy, competitive authoritarianism, counter-e
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Vorozheikina T. E. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo v Rossii i Latinskoi Amerike // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2001. № 6. S. 24-25.
Gaidar M. E., Snegovaya M. V. Revolyutsiya tsennostei: dremlet pritikhshii severnyi gorod // Vedomosti. 2012. 3 fevralya.
Gel'man V. Ya. Treshchiny v stene // Pro et Contra. 2012. № 1-2. S. 94-115.
Dal' R. A. Poliarkhiya: uchastie i oppozitsiya / per. s angl. S. Denikinoi, V. Baranova; Gos. un-t – Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki. M.: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta – Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2010. 288 s.
Donnell G. O. Delegativnaya demokratiya // Predely vlasti. 1994. № 2. S. 34-41.
Klyamkin I. M. Postkommunisticheskaya demokratiya i ee istoricheskie osobennosti v Rossii // Polis. 1993. № 2. S. 9-10.
Klyamkin I. M. Chto znachit byt' demokratom segodnya?: logika reformatsii totalitarizma (kruglyi stol) // Polis. 1991. № 4. S. 47-51.
Kryshtanovskaya O. V. Rezhim Putina: liberal'naya militokratiya? // Pro et Contra. 2002. T. 7. № 4. S. 158-180.
Ksenofontova I. V. Rol' Interneta v razvitii protestnogo dvizheniya // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya. 2012. № 3 (109). S. 114-116.
Mel'vil' A. Yu. Problemy konsolidatsii rossiiskoi politiki: i vnov' ob usloviyakh i predposylkakh dvizheniya k demokratii (kruglyi stol) // Polis. 1997. № 1. S. 125-128.
Merkel' V., Kruassan A. Formal'nye i neformal'nye instituty v defektnykh demokratiyakh (I) // Polis. 2002. № 1. S. 7-15.
Pastukhov V. B. Budushchee Rossii vyrastaet iz proshlogo // Polis. 1992. № 5-6. S. 60-74.
Sakva R. Rezhimnaya sistema i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii // Polis. 1997. № 1. S. 76-80.
Khantington S. Tret'ya volna. Demokratizatsiya v kontse KhKh veka. M.: ROSSPEN, 2003. 368 s.
Shevtsova L. F. Rezhim Borisa El'tsina. M.: Moskovskii Tsentr Karnegi, 1999. 535 s.
Shestopal E. B. Avtoritarnyi zapros na demokratiyu, ili Pochemu v Rossii ne rastut apel'siny // Polis. 2004. № 1. S. 25-28.
Collier D., Levitsky S. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research // World Politics. 1997. Vol. 49. № 3. R. 430-451.
Hantington S. Democracy for the Long Haul // Journal of Democracy. 1996. Vol. 7. № 2.
Levitsky S., Way L. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism // Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13. № 2.
O’Donnell G., Schmitter Ph. C. Defining Some Concepts (and Exposing Some Assumptions) // Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy / ed. by G. O’Donnell, Ph. C. Schmitter, L. Whitehead. Baltimore, 1986. Vol. 4. R. 9-13.
Русский
