Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2013. № 6. Part 1. P. 53-56.
AMBIGUITY OF CRITERIA FOR ARBITRATION COURTS AND GENERAL JURISDICTION COURTS JURISDICTION DISTINGUISHING AS PRECONDITION FOR INFRINGEMENT OF RIGHT TO ACCESS TO COURT
Dubeiko Anastasiya Alekseevna
National Research University "Higher School of Economics"
Abstract. The author considers the ambiguity of determining the criteria for the jurisdiction distinguishing of general jurisdiction courts and arbitration courts that, in her opinion, can lead to the infringement of one of the firm principles of legal proceedings – the right to access to court, reveals the criteria for jurisdiction distinguishing, presents the examples of difficulties that arise in practice, and pays special attention to the possible approaches to eliminating the existing problem of jurisdiction distinguishing.
Key words and phrases: доступ к суду, подведомственность, суды общей юрисдикции, арбитражные суды, Европейский Суд по правам человека, экономическая деятельность, критерии разграничения подведомственности, access to court, jurisdiction, general jurisdiction courts, arbitration
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Annenkov K. N. Opyt kommentariya k Ustavu grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1878. T. 1. 484 s.
Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks RF ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. 25.06.2012) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF (SZRF). 2012. № 26. St. 3439.
Bezymyannaya protiv Rossii (Bezymyannaya v. Russia) [Elektronnyi resurs]: Postanovlenie Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 22.12.2009 (zhaloba № 21851/03). URL: http://www.belgorod.arbitr.ru (data obrashcheniya: 25.02.2013).
Bobotov S. Pravosudie vo Frantsii. M.: EAV, 1994. 198 s.
Grazhdanskii kodeks RF ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (red. 06.04.2011) // SZRF. 2011. № 15. St. 2040.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks RSFSR ot 11.06.1964 (red. 07.08.2000) // Vedomosti VS RSFSR. 1964. № 24. St. 407.
Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks RF ot 14.02.2002 № 138-FZ (red. 30.11.2011) // SZRF. 2002. № 46. St. 4532.
Gurvich M. A. Pravo na isk. M. – L.: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1949. 215 s.
Eliseev N. G. Razreshenie kollizii podvedomstvennosti [Elektronnyi resurs] // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2007. № 8. S. 20-27. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Zhuikov V. M. Sudebnaya reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiyu. M.: Statut, 2006. 283 s.
Zaitsev R. V. Praktika arbitrazhnykh sudov RF po rassmotreniyu nepodvedomstvennykh del [Elektronnyi resurs] // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2008. № 12. S. 28-32. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Nalogovyi kodeks RF ot 31.08.1998 № 146-FZ (red. 31.12.2001) // SZRF. 2002. № 1. St. 4.
O nekotorykh voprosakh podvedomstvennosti del sudam i arbitrazhnym sudam [Elektronnyi resurs]: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF i Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 18 avgusta 1992 g. № 12/12. Dostup iz SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus".
Osipov Yu. K. Podvedomstvennost' yuridicheskikh del: avtoref. diss. … d.yu.n. Sverdlovsk, 1973. 36 s.
Standarty spravedlivogo pravosudiya: mezhdunarodnye i natsional'nye praktiki / pod red. T. G. Morshchakovoi. M.: Mysl', 2012. 584 s.
Русский
