Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2012. № 5. Part 1. P. 162-168.
EVIDENCE RECOGNITION AS INADMISSIBLE IN CRIMINAL PROCESS OF RUSSIA
Serednev Vladimir Anatol'evich
Nizhnii Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevskii
Abstract. The author analyzes evidence admissibility in the criminal process of Russia, in the first part of the article conducts the analysis of the notion evidence, considers general conditions of evidence admissibility, determines evidence admissibility criteria, shows the necessity to consolidate the requirements of the comprehensiveness, completeness and objectivity of crime circumstances establishment not as the element common for all the subjects of evidence evaluation principle for inner conviction, but as the general condition of preliminary investigation; and in the second part determines the criteria of evidence recognition as inadmissible, the major among which is citizens' constitutional rights violation.
Key words and phrases: доказательство, допустимость, судопроизводство, форма, обстоятельства, конституция, сведения, источник, собирание, проверка и оценка доказательств, знание, суждение, всесторонность, полнота, объективность, оперативно-розыскная деятельность, evidence, admissibility, court procedure, form, circumstances, constitution, information, source, collection, validation and evaluation of evidence, knowledge, judgment, comprehensiveness, completeness, objectivity, operational-investigative activity
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Vasyaev A. A. Priznanie dokazatel'stv nedopustimymi v khode sudebnogo sledstviya v sude pervoi instantsii v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse: monografiya. M.: Volters Kluver, 2010.
Vorob'ev A. V., En'kov A. L., Silkov P. Yu., Tikhonravov Yu. V. "Delo Yukosa" kak zerkalo russkoi advokatury: kompleksnoe issledovanie v zashchitu rossiiskoi advokatury i pravosudiya. M., 2008.
Vyshinskii A. Ya. Teoriya sudebnykh dokazatel'stv v sovetskom prave. M., 1950.
Grinenko A. V. Sistema printsipov i tsel' proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // Pravovedenie. 2000. № 6. S. 179-192.
Gromov N. A., Nikolaichenko V. V. Printsipy ugolovnogo protsessa, ikh ponyatie i sistema // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1997. № 7.
Davletov A. A. Osnovy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo poznaniya. Sverdlovsk, 1991.
Kalinkina L. D. Narusheniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakona i ikh pravovye posledstviya. Saransk, 1993.
Kalinkina L. D. Narusheniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakona i ikh pravovye posledstviya po UPK RF // Problemnye voprosy primeneniya Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii: mat. nauch.-prakt. konf. / Mord. gos. un-t im. N. P. Ogareva; Mordov. gumanit. in-t; Prokuratura RM i dr.; pod red. V. T. Tomina, L. D. Kalinkinoi. Saransk, 2002.
Lazareva V. A. Sudebnaya vlast' i ee realizatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse. Samara, 1999.
O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Konstitutsii RF pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya [Elektronnyi resurs]: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 8 ot 31 oktyabrya 1995 g. Dostup iz sprav.-pravov. sistemy "Garant".
Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: 70 000 slov / pod red. N. Yu. Shvedovoi. Izd-e 23-e, ispr. M., 1991.
Polyanskii N. N. Dokazatel'stva v inostrannom ugolovnom protsesse. M., 1946.
Rozovskii B. G. Nenauchnye zametki o nekotorykh nauchnykh problemakh ugolovnogo protsessa: esse. Lugansk: RIO LAVD, 2004.
Smirnov A. V. Reformy ugolovnoi yustitsii kontsa XX veka i diskursivnaya sostyazatel'nost' // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2001. № 12.
Filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 5-ti t. / glav. red. F. V. Konstantinov. M., 1967. T. 4.
Chervotkin A. S. Apellyatsiya i kassatsiya: posobie dlya sudei. M., 2010.
Sheifer S. A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. M.: Norma, 2009.
Русский
