Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2012. № 12. Part 1. P. 176-179.
TRADITIONAL AND NEW THEORIES OF REFERENCE: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
Novoselov Viktor Gennad'evich
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Abstract. The author presents the different interpretations analysis of the content of the notions meaning and reference in the theory of sign systems, basing on the analysis concludes that the theory of reference by H. Putnam, the theory of language games by L. Wittgenstein and semiotics by Ch. Peirce, despite methodological differences, in general similarly interpret the notions of meaning and reference in the effort to overcome mentalistic element, and tells that the meaning of a sign is understood as the way of its use and interpretation.
Key words and phrases: знак, значение, смысл, обозначение, означивание, sign, meaning, sense, designation, attribution
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Vitgenshtein L. Iz "Filosofskikh issledovanii" // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M., 1985. Vyp. XVI. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika. S. 32-54.
Novoselov V. G. Problema interpretatsii znaka i neogranichennyi semiozis // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2011. № 8 (14). Ch. 2. S. 160-163.
Patnem Kh. Znachenie i referentsiya // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M., 1982. Vyp. 13. S. 374-392.
Frege G. Smysl i znachenie // Frege G. Izbrannye raboty. M.: Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 1997. S. 26-43.
Eko U. Rol' chitatelya. Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta. M.: Izdatel'stvo RGGU, 2005. 502 s.
Russel B. On Denoting // The Philosophy of Language / ed. A. P. Martinich. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, 1996. R. 112-126.
Русский
