Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2011. № 6. Part 3. P. 56-63.
LEASE COVENANTS IN COMMERCIAL PROPERTY SYSTEM: THE USA EXPERIENCE
Grechko Denis Petrovich
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Abstract. The author reveals the content of the notion implied covenant of continuous operation in the sphere of lease at multi-functional estate property complexes and pays special attention to studying the materials of the USA judicial practice, to the analysis of the differentiated approaches to solving the question about a leaseholder'sliability for the suspension or stoppage of operating activities and to the characteristic of the criteria which are basic for courts' judgments about implied covenant violation.
Key words and phrases: подразумеваемое обязательство о непрерывном осуществлении коммерческой деятельности, общие принципы применения подразумеваемых условий, арендная плата, разрешенное использование недвижимости, правомерное противодействие конкуренции, implied covenant of continuous operation, standard factors of implied terms application, rent, permitted use of estate property, noncompetition covenant
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bastian v. Albertson'sInc. 912, 643 P. 2d 1079, 1082. Idaho. 1982.
Carl A. Schuberg Inc. v. Kroger Co. 317 N.W. 2d 606, 607. Mich. Ct. App. 1982.
College Block v. Atl. Richfield Co. 254 Cal. Rptr. 179, 183. Cal. Ct. App. 1988.
Dickey v. Phila Minit-Man Corp. 377 Pa. 549. 1954.
DPLM Ltd. v. J. H. Harvey Co. 526 S.E. 2d 409, 241 Ga. App. 219. Ct. of Ap. Georgia. 1999.
Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. Retail Investors. 266 N.W. 2d 22, 29. Sup. Ct. of Iowa. 1978.
First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Safeway Stores Inc. 151 Ariz. 584. App. 1986.
Forrest Drive Associates v.Wal-Mart Stores Inc.72 F. Supp. 2d. Dist. Ct., M.D. North Carolina. 1999.
Frederick Bus. Props. Co. v. Peoples Drug Stores Inc. 445 S.E. 2d 176, 181. West Virginia. 1994.
Fuller Mkt. Basket Inc. v. Gillingham & Jones Inc. 539 P. 2d 868, 872. Wa. Ct. App. 1975.
Keyston Square v.Marsh Supermarkets Inc. 459 N.E. 2d 420. Crt. of App. 3rd Dis., Ind. 1984.
Kroger Co.and Genesco Inc. v. Chemical Securities Company. 562 S.W. 2d 468. Sup. Ct. of Tennessee. 1975.
Lagrew v.Hooks-SupeRx Inc.905 F. Supp. 401, 405. E.D. K.y. 1995.
Lilac Variety Inc. v. Dallas Texas Company. 383 S.W. 2d 193. Tex. Civ. App. 1964.
McKinney J. C. Are You Trying to Imply Something?: Understanding the Various State Approaches to Implied Covenants of Continuous Operation in Commercial Leases // 31 UALR L. Rev. 427. 2008-2009. P. 427-504.
Mercury Investment Co. v.F. W. Woolworth Co. 706 P. 2d 523. 1985.
Palm v.Mortgage Investment Co. of El Paso.S.W. 2d 869, 873. Tex. Civ. App. 1950.
Pequot Spring Water Co. v.Brunelle. 698 A. 2d, 920, 924. Conn. App. Ct. 1997.
Plaza Associates v. Unified Development Inc. 524 N.W. WD 725, 729. Minn. Ct. App. 1994.
Powell on Real Property / Michael Allan Wolf Edition. Mathew Bender & Company, Inc., 2009. Vol. 2. Richard R. Powell. P. 17A-35.
Rapids Associates v.Shopko Store Inc. 96 Wis. 2d 516, 292 N.W. 2d 668. 1980.
Русский
