Considering communication features of English-language argumentative interaction in the BBC 1 documentary series “Fake or Fortune”
Ivanova Julia Evgenievna
The Odintsovo Branch of Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Submitted: 11.02.2024
Abstract. The paper deals with the interaction of English-speaking participants in which they argue their positions about a piece of art (based on the BBC 1 documentary series “Fake or Fortune”). The aim of the study is to analyse features of argumentative interaction and identify the linguistic means of persuasiveness in the speech of discourse participants based on a BBC TV series. The novelty lies in the representation of linguistic argumentative features in the interaction of English-speaking non/experts in the field of art. As a result, the discourse genres of “request”, “offer” and “information exchange” during communication have been identified and analysed. The prevailing strategies and tactics for organizing these discourse genres have been established. The role of cognitive and pragmatic mechanisms in persuasion is noted. The verbal means, which identify the important semantic components in communication, are described.
Key words and phrases: аргументативные дискурсивные форматы, просьба, предложение, информирование, средства убедительности, argumentative discourse genres, request, offer, information exchange, verbal means of persuasion
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyi podkhod): avtoref. … d. filol. n. M., 1990.
Belyaevskaya E. G. Mediinyi diskurs: kognitivnye modeli interpretatsii sobytiya (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) // Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki. 2015. № 3 (44).
Boldyrev N. N. Interpretiruyushchaya funktsiya yazyka // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. 2011. Vyp. 60. № 33 (248).
Boldyrev N. N. Otsenochnye kategorii kak format znaniya // Issledovanie tipov znanii i problema ikh klassifikatsii: sbornik nauch. trudov. M. – Tambov: Izdatel'skii dom Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. G. R. Derzhavina, 2008.
Boldyrev N. N., Grigor'eva V. S. Dominantnyi printsip i integrativnost' formata rechevogo vzaimodeistviya v dialogicheskom diskurse: monografiya. Tambov: Print-Servis, 2020.
Vasil'ev L. G. Argumentiruyushchii diskurs: usloviya udachi (po materialam zarubezhnoi argumentatsii) // Filologiya i chelovek. 2007. № 1.
Vasil'ev L. G., Kas'yanova Yu. I. Argument i ego strukturnaya interpretatsiya // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i filologiya. 2012. № 5-4.
Volkova Yu. S., Mishlanov V. A., Salimovskii V. A. Argumentativnaya rech' v massmediinom interaktivnom obshchenii // Medialingvistika. 2019. T. 6. № 2. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2019.202
Vol'f E. M. Funktsional'naya semantika otsenki. Izd-e 4-e. M.: LIBROKOM, 2009.
Grigor'eva V. S. Diskurs kak element kommunikativnogo protsessa: pragmalingvisticheskii i kommunikativnyi aspekty: monografiya. Tambov: Izd-vo Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2007.
Grigor'eva V. S. Integrativnost' formata rechevogo vzaimodeistviya v dialogicheskom diskurse (na primere bytovykh diskursivnykh zhanrov): diss. … d. filol. n. Tambov, 2018.
Dzhioeva A. A., Ivanova V. G. Understatement kak otrazhenie anglo-saksonskogo mentaliteta // Angliiskii yazyk na gumanitarnykh fakul'tetakh: teoriya i praktika: sbornik nauchnykh i metodicheskikh trudov. M., 2009. Vyp. 3.
Ivanova Yu. E. Komparativnyi analiz lingvokul'turologicheskikh osobennostei diskussii v angloyazychnom i russkoyazychnom polilogovom obshchenii // Yazyk i kul'tura. 2019. № 48. https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/48/9
Ivin A. A. Osnovy teorii argumentatsii: uchebnik. M.: VLADOS, 1997.
Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi. Izd-e 5-e. M.: LKI, 2008.
Karasik V. I. Tsennosti kak kul'turno znachimye orientiry povedeniya // Gumanitarnye tekhnologii v sovremennom mire: sbornik materialov VII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (30 maya – 1 iyunya 2019 g.). Kaliningrad, 2019.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovaya matritsa kul'tury: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2013.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. M.: Gnozis, 2004.
Kuz'menkova Yu. B. Ot traditsii kul'tury k normam rechevogo povedeniya britantsev, amerikantsev i rossiyan. M.: MAKS Press, 2008.
Kunaeva N. V. Argumentativnyi diskurs: osnovnye podkhody k izucheniyu i problemy analiza // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya. 2007. № 2-2.
Larina T. V. Kategoriya vezhlivosti i stil' kommunikatsii: sopostavlenie angliiskikh i russkikh lingvokul'turnykh traditsii. M.: Rukopisnye pamyatniki Drevnei Rusi, 2009.
Lisanyuk E. N. Argumentatsiya i ubezhdenie. SPb.: Nauka, 2015.
Mikhaleva E. I., Pushinina I. V. Pragmaticheskie osobennosti khedzhirovaniya v akademicheskom diskurse // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2022. № 1 (45). https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2022.45.1.12
Oshchepkova V. V. Yazyk i kul'tura Velikobritanii, SShA, Kanady, Avstralii i Novoi Zelandii: ucheb. posobie. M. – SPb.: Glossa-Press; KARO, 2004.
Oshchepkova N. A. Strategii i taktiki v argumentativnom diskurse: pragmalingvisticheskii analiz ubeditel'nosti rassuzhdeniya (na materiale politicheskikh debatov): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Tver', 2004.
Troyanov V. I. Lichnostnye strategii obosnovaniya v diskurse // Lichnostnye aspekty yazykovogo obshcheniya: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Kalinin: Kalininskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1989.
Filippova M. M. Angliiskii natsional'nyi kharakter: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Astrel', 2007.
Ball W. J. Understatement and Overstatement in English // English Language Teaching Journal. 1970. Vol. XXIV. Iss. 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/XXIV.3.201
Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Galtung J. Structure, Culture and Intellectual Style: An Essay Comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic Approaches // Social Science Information. 1981. Vol. 20. Iss. 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901848102000601
Grice H. P. Logic and Conversation // Syntax and Semantics. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1975. Vol. 3 / ed. by P. Cole and J. L. Morgan.
Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. L. – N. Y.: Longman, 1983.
Русский
