Comparative aspect of the study of mythonyms in the Turkic ethnocultural space
Gilazova Guzaliya Sayfullovna
Kazan State Institute of Culture
Submitted: 09.08.2024
Abstract. The paper presents a comparative aspect of the study of mythonyms in the Turkic ethnic space. The research aims to conduct a comprehensive exploration of the main lexico-semantic and ethnolinguistic features of mythonyms in the Turkic ethnocultural space in a comparative aspect. Mythonyms contribute to a deep awareness of the Turkic ethno-cultural space. The paper analyzes the semantics of mythonyms based on the material of folk traditional culture in the Turkish, Tatar, and Bashkir languages and identifies the characteristic features of these mythonyms. The scientific novelty lies in a comparative ethnolinguistic analysis of mythonyms, conducted using examples of mythological characters from Tatar, Bashkir, and Turkish cultures, which determines the conditioning of their specific functioning in small folklore genres. The research has established that the content of mythonyms represents significant concepts of the Turkic ethnocultural space. The results have shown that there are two directions in the study of mythonymy: ethnolinguistic and comparative. As a result of a comparative study, it has been proved that the Turkic religious and mythological system is characterized by the use of common mythonyms, which are actively used in folklore genres. It has been also found that mythonyms derived from Quranic characters are more frequently used in folk cultural images. Ethnolinguistic research has shown that the semantic potential of the mythonyms created on the basis of the names Muhammad, Suleiman, Khozyr associated with Islam reflect ethnocultural information about a certain ethnocultural environment. The functioning of mythonyms in small aphoristic genres (proverbs, sayings, and incantations) makes it possible to identify the types closest to their local variants within their own ethno-cultural space.
Key words and phrases: тюркская мифонимика, сравнительный аспект мифонимов, татарский язык, турецкий язык, башкирский язык, мифоним, этнолингвистический анализ, Turkic mythonymy, comparative aspect of mythonyms, Tatar language, Turkish language, Bashkir language, mythonym, ethnolinguistic analysis
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Agapkina T. A. Vostochnoslavyanskie lechebnye zagovory v sravnitel'nom osveshchenii: syuzhetika i obraz mira. M.: Indrik, 2010.
Bayazitova F. S. Khalyk traditsiyalәre leksikasy. Mifologik personazhlar, yshanular. Kazan: Fiker, 2018.
Belova O. V. Etnokul'turnye stereotipy v slavyanskoi narodnoi traditsii. M.: Indrik, 2005.
Berezovich E. L. Russkaya toponimiya v etnolingvisticheskom aspekte: mifopoeticheskii obraz prostranstva. M.: KomKniga, 2010.
Bogatyrev P. G. Fol'klor kak osobaya forma tvorchestva. M., 1971.
Veselovskii A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1989.
Vinogradova L. N. Mifologicheskii aspekt slavyanskoi fol'klornoi traditsii. M.: Indrik, 2016.
Gabisheva L. L. Slovo v kontekste mifopoeticheskoi kartiny. M.: RGGU, 2003.
Gyil'manov G. G. Tatar miflary: iyalər, yshanular, yrymnar, fallar, im-tomnar, synamyshlar, iolalar. Kazan: Tatarstan kitap nəshr., 1996.
Davletshina L. Mifologizm v tatarskoi proze kontsa XX – nachala XXI vekov: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Kazan', 2005.
Zelenin D. K. Vostochnoslavyanskaya etnografiya. M.: Nauka, 1991.
Ivanova E. E. K izucheniyu gornoi mifonimii Urala: mifonimy, motivirovannye sotsial'noi leksikoi // Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2023. T. 25. № 4.
Kalinkin V. M. Poetika onima. Donetsk, 1999.
Koblov Ya. D. Mifologiya kazanskikh tatar. Kazan': Tipo-lit. Imp. un-ta, 1910.
Kondrat'eva T. N. Sobstvennye imena v mesyatseslovakh, poslovitsakh, pogovorkakh, zagadkakh, zagovorakh i skazkakh russkogo naroda. Kazan', 2004.
Kormushin I. V. Tyurkskie eniseiskie epitafii: teksty i issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1997.
Nikitina S. E. Ustnaya narodnaya kul'tura i yazykovoe soznanie. M.: Nauka, 1993.
Superanskaya A. V. Obshchaya teoriya imeni sobstvennogo. M.: Nauka, 1973.
Tolstoi N. I., Tolstaya S. M. Slavyanskaya etnolingvistika: voprosy teorii. M.: Institut slavyanovedeniya RAN, 2013.
Freidenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Nauka, 1978.
Yakhin F. Tatar shig"riyatendә dini mistika һәm mifologiya. Kazan: Tatar. dәүlәt gumanitar in-ty, 2000.
Şahin İ. Adbilim (Çerçeve, Terim, Yöntem ve Sınıflandırmalarıyla). Ankara: Pigem Akademi, 2016.
Русский
