A comparative analysis of kinds of parcelling in the Russian, Chuvash and English languages
Shpareva Galina Ivanovna, Emelyanova Margarita Valentinovna, Yakovleva Galina Grigoryevna, Danilov Andrey Anatolyevich
Chuvash State University
Submitted: 03.08.2024
Abstract. The aim of the research is to identify similar and specific types of parcelled constructions in Russian, Chuvash and English. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the comprehensive comparative analysis of the structural-grammatical and functional-semantic organization of parcelling in languages with different syntax organization. One of the languages being compared is the agglutinative Chuvash language, which demonstrates significant potential for linguistic research, including its expressive syntax. The article describes typical kinds of parcelling in the mentioned languages. It is shown that the syntax organization of the reviewed languages has a direct impact on the functional and structural nature of parcelling in each of them. Examples of types of parcels are provided, based on the developed system of criteria for their analysis. As a result, it is determined that in the English language, a completed syntactic structure is parcelled off much more often than in Russian and Chuvash. Additionally, a distinguishing feature of the Chuvash parcel is noted: its comparatively predominant preposition in a sentence. Specific and most characteristic types of parcelled constructions in the English language are identified. They are linear sequentially parcelled into separate words and phrases constructions, as well as a paragraph-level parcel.
Key words and phrases: парцелляция, виды парцеллятов, русский язык, чувашский язык, английский язык, parcelling, kinds of parcels, Russian language, Chuvash language, English language
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aleksandrova O. V. Problemy ekspressivnogo sintaksisa: na materiale angliiskogo yazyka. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1984.
Andreev I. A. Khal'khi chăvash chĕlkhi. Sintaksis. Shupashkar: Chăvash kĕneke izdatel'stvi, 2005.
Andreev N. A. Chăvash chĕlkhin stilistiki: ocherksem: 3 paira. Shupashkar: Chăvash kĕneke izdatel'stvi, 1966. 3-mĕsh paiĕ. Sintaksis.
Arakin V. D. Tipologiya yazykov i problema metodicheskogo prognozirovaniya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1989.
Ashmarin N. I. Opyt issledovaniya chuvashskogo sintaksisa: v 2 ch. Kazan': Tipografiya V. M. Klyuchnikova, 1903. Ch. 1.
Babaitseva V. V. Izbrannoe. 1955-2005: sb. nauch. i nauch.-metod. st. M. – Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2005.
Babaitseva V. V. Izbrannoe. 2005-2010: sb. nauch. i nauch.-metod. st. M. – Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2010.
Babaitseva V. V. Sinkretizm partsellirovannykh i prisoedinitel'nykh konstruktsii substantivnykh fragmentov teksta // Filologicheskie nauki. 1997. № 4.
Bogoyavlenskaya Yu. V. Partsellyatsiya v russkom i frantsuzskom yazykakh: opyt sopostavitel'nogo kognitivno-semioticheskogo issledovaniya: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2021.
Bogoyavlenskaya Yu. V. Teoriya i metodologiya sopostavitel'nogo kognitivno-semioticheskogo korpusnogo issledovaniya partsellyatsii vo frantsuzskikh i russkikh pechatnykh SMI: diss. … d. filol. n. Ekaterinburg, 2016.
Vorob'eva E. N. Partsellyatsiya kak sredstvo ekspressivnogo sintaksisa (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) // Na peresechenii yazykov i kul'tur. Aktual'nye voprosy gumanitarnogo znaniya. 2023a. № 1 (25).
Vorob'eva E. N. Ekspressivnaya funktsiya yazyka: sistemnyi obzor // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2023b. T. 16. Vyp. 1.
Gorskii S. P. Yazyk poezii K. V. Ivanova // Uchenye zapiski / Nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut yazyka, literatury, istorii i ekonomiki pri Sovete Ministrov Chuvashskoi ASSR. Cheboksary, 1956. Vyp. 14.
Gur'eva T. N. O strukturno-semanticheskoi kharakteristike partsellyatsii vtorostepennykh chlenov predlozheniya v chuvashskom yazyke // Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni I. Ya. Yakovleva. 2012. № 3.
Egorov V. G. Sovremennyi chuvashskii literaturnyi yazyk v sravnitel'no-istoricheskom osveshchenii. Cheboksary: Chuvashskoe gosudarstvennoe izd-vo, 1954. Ch. 1.
Ivanova A. M. Problemy morfosintaksisa v chuvashskom yazykoznanii: tipologo-kontrastivnyi aspekt. Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2011.
Ivanova A. M., Semenova G. N. Slozhnopodchinennoe predlozhenie v sovremennom chuvashskom yazyke: sravnitel'no-sopostavitel'nyi aspekt: monografiya. Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016.
Petrov N. P. Partsellyatsiya v gazetno-publitsisticheskoi rechi // Voprosy istorii chuvashskogo literaturnogo yazyka i ego stilei: mat. nauch. konf. Cheboksary, 1999.
Priyatkina A. F. K izucheniyu prisoedinitel'nykh konstruktsii // Priyatkina A. F. Russkii sintaksis v grammaticheskom aspekte (sintaksicheskie svyazi i konstruktsii): izbrannye trudy. Vladivostok, 2007.
San'yarova N. S. O kriteriyakh razgranicheniya prisoedineniya i partsellyatsii // Nizhnevartovskii filologicheskii vestnik. 2020. № 2.
San'yarova N. S. Transformatsiya vzglyadov O. V. Mar'inoi na prisoedinitel'nye i partsellirovannye konstruktsii // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya: problemy i perspektivy: sb. mat. V mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Kirov, 2021.
Sevryugina E. V. Prisoedinenie – partsellyatsiya // Nauka i shkola. 2012. № 5.
Semenova G. N. Partsellyatsiya v russkom i chuvashskom yazykakh kak sredstvo ekspressivnogo sintaksisa // Natsional'nye yazyki i literatury v polikul'turnykh usloviyakh: sb. tr. konf. Cheboksary, 2017.
Skovorodnikov A. P. O sootnoshenii ponyatii «partsellyatsiya» i «prisoedinenie» // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1978. № 1.
Chernikova N. V. Stilisticheskie i sintaksicheskie funktsii partsellyatsii (na materiale povesti B. L. Vasil'eva «A zori zdes' tikhie…») // Russkii yazyk v shkole. 2024. T. 85. № 2.
Shpareva G. I. Reprezentatsiya sredstv ekspressivnogo sintaksisa (partsellyatsii i inversii) v russkom, chuvashskom i angliiskom yazykakh: diss. … k. filol. n. Cheboksary, 2023.
Shpareva G. I. Sravnitel'no-sopostavitel'nyi analiz upotrebleniya inversii v raznostrukturnykh yazykakh: v russkom, chuvashskom i angliiskom // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoriya i filologiya». 2020. T. 30. № 3.
Biber D., Johansson S., Leech G. N. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company, 2021.
Emmott C., Sanford A. J., Morrow L. I. Capturing the Attention of Readers? Stylistic and Psychological Perspectives on the Use and Effect of Text Fragmentation in Narratives // Journal of Literary Semantics. 2006. Vol. 35. Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/JLS.2006.001
Kline C. R. Formal Fragments: The English Minor Sentence // Research in the Teaching of English. 1977. Vol. 11. Iss. 2.
Schuster E. H. Beyond Grammar: The Richness of English Language, or the Zero-Tolerance Approach to Rigid Rules // English Journal. 2011. Vol. 100. Iss. 4.
Wright A. Sentence Fragments: Elements of Style, Postcolonial Edition // Journal of Advanced Composition. 1998. Vol. 18. Iss. 1.
Русский
