Subject-object approach to interdiscourse in the coordinates of the literary practice of parrhesia (Charles Dickens’s novel “Bleak House”)
Ryabova Irina Yurievna
Ural State Law University named after V. F. Yakovlev
Submitted: 06.07.2024
Abstract. The research aims to trace the dynamics of the interaction between the author’s linguistic personality and the text in a literary work with legal topics, where the text of the novel is a result of the literary practice of parrhesia in interdiscourse as a uniquely constituted linguo-socio-cultural space. The paper examines the specifics of the interaction between the author’s linguistic personality and the text within the framework of the subject-object approach to interdiscourse, which allows for a deeper understanding of the close connection between the personal characteristics of the writer, the discursive, cognitive, and pragmatic foundations of his work, and the linguistic means used. The paper proposes the idea that the formation of the author’s linguistic personality is conditioned by the “duality” of his professional competences (as a literary scholar and a man of law). The scientific originality of the research lies in describing the correlational connections between the linguistic personality of the parrhesiastic writer, his “participatory” thinking, types of socio-linguistic consciousness, and the spectrum of expressive linguistic means, in particular the quoted word. As a result of the research, it was found that the linguistic personality of the parrhesiastic writer, conditioned by the field of law, is a complexly organized psycho-social phenomenon capable of masterfully implementing a pragmatically charged communicative program, turning interdiscourse into a field of social struggle.
Key words and phrases: интердискурс, литературная практика парресии, профессионально детерминированная языковая личность, субъектно-объектный подход, цитатное слово, interdiscourse, literary practice of parrhesia, professionally determined linguistic personality, subject-object approach, quoted word
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenii: v 7 t. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2012. T. 3. Teoriya romana (1930-1961 gg.).
Bogin G. I. Kontseptsiya yazykovoi lichnosti: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. L., 1982.
Boldyrev N. N. Yazyk i sistema znanii. Kognitivnaya teoriya yazyka. M.: Izdatel'skii dom YaSK, 2018.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Rizoma. Parizh, 1976.
Dement'ev V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya. M.: Gnozis, 2006.
Dzyuba E. V., Ryabova I. Yu. Kategoriya diskursivnoi dialogichnosti kak reprezentatsiya zhanrovogo potentsiala romana // Zhanry rechi. 2023. T. 18. Vyp. 4 (40).
Zagibalova M. A. Osobennosti kul'turnogo razvitiya sovremennosti: fenomen karnavalizatsii // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2011. Vyp. 2.
Zykova I. V. Lingvokognitivnye osnovaniya integratsii poeticheskogo teksta v kinodiskurs // Slovo.ru: baltiiskii aktsent. 2024. T. 15. № 2.
Karasik V. I. Diskursivnaya personologiya // Yazyk, kommunikatsiya i sotsial'naya sreda. 2007. Vyp. 5.
Katermina V. V. Yazykovaya lichnost' avtora v khudozhestvennom tekste // Chelovek. Kul'tura. Obrazovanie. 2016. № 2 (20).
Kvadratura smysla: frantsuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa / per. s fr. i port.; obshch. red. i vst. st. P. Serio; pred. Yu. S. Stepanova. M.: OAO IG «Progress», 1999.
Kibrik A. A. Analiz diskursa v kognitivnoi perspektive: diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2003.
Lakan Zh. Funktsiya i pole rechi i yazyka v psikhoanalize / per. s fr.; per. A. K. Chernoglazova. M.: Gnozis, 1995.
Mints Z. G. Funktsii reministsentsii v poetike Al. Bloka // Mints Z. G. Poetika Aleksandra Bloka. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPB, 1999.
Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Semantiko-kognitivnyi analiz yazyka: monografiya. Voronezh: Istoki, 2007.
Preobrazhenskii S. Yu. Problema mezhtekstovykh svyazei v lingvisticheskom tolkovanii khudozhestvennykh tekstov: allyuziya i tsitatsiya // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Teoriya yazyka, semiotika i semantika». 2017. T. 8. № 4.
Riker P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika. Moskovskie lektsii i interv'yu. M.: AO «KAMI», 1995.
Ruzhitskii I. V., Potemkina E. V. «Elitarnaya yazykovaya lichnost'» i brannaya leksika (na primere idiolekta F. M. Dostoevskogo) // Russkaya rech'. 2018. № 6.
Feshchenko V. V. Lingvokreativnost' v khudozhestvennom i nauchnom diskursakh // Lingvokreativnost' v diskursakh raznykh tipov: predely i vozmozhnosti: kollektivnaya monografiya / otv. red. I. V. Zykova. M.: R. Valent, 2021.
Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya / per. s fr. M. B. Rakovoi, A. Yu. Serebryannikovoi; vstup. st. A. S. Kolesnikova. SPb.: ITs «Gumanitarnaya Akademiya»; Universitetskaya kniga, 2004.
Fuko M. Diskurs i istina // Logos. 2008. № 2 (65).
Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 / ed. by C. Gordon. L.: Harvester Press, 1980.
Matthews M. Law Meets Literature: Bleak House and the British Court of Chancery. 2015. https://www.mimimatthews.com/2015/04/06/law-meets-literature-bleak-house-and-the-british-court-of-chancery/
Williams G. French Discourse Analysis. The Method of Post-Structuralism. L. – N. Y.: Routledge, 1999.
Русский
