Linguistics and psychoanalysis: Discourse and metadiscourse
Sedykh Arkadiy Petrovich, Akimova Elvira Nikolajevna, Chizhova Anastasia Olegovna
Moscow International University; Belgorod National Research University; Belgorod State Technological University
Pushkin State Russian Language Institute
Institute of International Economic Relations
Submitted: 08.07.2024
Abstract. The aim of the study is to identify points of contact between linguistic and psychoanalytic discourses and metadiscourses. The scientific novelty of the work consists in the construction of a linguo-semiological model for describing discourse and metadiscourse in order to clarify the conceptual apparatus and more clearly structure the semantic terminology of linguistics, psychoanalysis, as well as the theory of language and communication theory. An important point of the study is the discovery of epistemological similarities and differences between the terminological apparatus and operational models of text analysis used in both disciplines, in other words, between the linguistic and psychoanalytic processing of utterances in line with the interpretative-semiological approach. The obtained data allow us to identify several crucial mechanisms of linguistic and semiotic interaction between the subjects of various scientific fields. This synergy is essential for effective communication and drives the advancement of linguistic and cultural knowledge. By activating the dynamics of linguistic and cultural data, we can create a new metadiscourse axiology in both theory and practice. This applies not only to the field of psycholinguistics but also to general linguistics.
Key words and phrases: лингвосемиология, терминосистема лингвопсихоанализа, анализ текста, метадискурс, linguo-semiology, terminology of linguopsychoanalysis, text analysis, metadiscourse
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Karasik V. I. Diskursologiya kak napravlenie kommunikativnoi lingvistiki // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2016. № 1.
Karasik V. I. Evolyutsiya i involyutsiya kontseptov // Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy lingvokontseptologii i lingvokul'turnykh tipazhei: sb. nauch. st. / pod red. N. A. Krasavskogo. Volgograd, 2007.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. M.: GNOZIS, 2004.
Olyanich A. V. Lingvosemiotika eticheskoi interaktsii: znak, slovo, tekst (diskurs) // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2014. № 16.
Raikh V. Kharakteroanaliz. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2006.
Riker P. Pamyat', istoriya, zabvenie. M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoi literatury, 2004.
Sedykh A. P. Kommunikativnyi portret Nikolya Sarkozi // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2011. № 2 (36).
Sedykh A. P. Yazyk, kul'tura, kommunikatsiya: frantsuzskii mir: monografiya. Belgorod: Epitsentr, 2022.
Sedykh A. P., Akimova E. N., Bezkorovainaya G. T. Lingvokul'turemy, mezhkul'turnyi transfer i transkul'turnoe modelirovanie (na materiale russkogo i frantsuzskogo yazykov) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2024. T. 17. Vyp. 1. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240014
Sedykh A. P., Akimova E. N., Skvortsov K. V. Diskursnye «ipostasi» Zhaka Lakana: frantsuzskaya lingvokul'tura // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2024. T. 17. Vyp. 4. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240014
Sedykh A. P., Buzinova L. M., Pashkovskaya N. D. Diskursologiya, mezhdistsiplinarnost', regionalizatsiya. Belgorod: Epitsentr, 2023.
Babu J.-Ph. Gustave Guillaume, aux sources archéologiques du problème de l’article: Thèse pour obtenir le grade de docteur de l’université Paris-Sorbonne. P., 2014.
Dubois D. S., Cance C. Vers une sémiotique du sensible: des couleurs en discours et en pratiques // Histoire Epistémologie Langage. 2012. No. 34 (1).
Flame É. Lacan, le langage et rien d’autre… // Annuel de l’APF. 2012. No. 1.
Freud S. Sur la psychanalyse. Cinq leçons. P.: Flammarion, 2020.
Guillaume G. Leçons de linguistique, 1956-1957 / éd. par G. Plante. Québec – Lille: P. U. Laval-PUL, 1982.
Hangay Z. Szövegtan // Le livre de la langue hongroise / dir. A. Jászó Anna. 8e éd. Budapest: Trezor, 2007.
Identités sociales et discursives / sous la dir. de P. Charaudeau. P.: Harmattan, 2009.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Le discours en interaction. P.: Dunod, 2005.
Kristeva J. Le temps sensible. Proust et l’expérience littéraire. P.: Folio Essais, 2000.
Lacan J. Séminaire V. P.: Le Seuil, 1998.
Lacan J. Séminaire XI: Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. P.: Le Seuil, 1973.
Morin E. La méthode: en 6 vols. P.: Seuil, 2006. Vol. 6. L’éthique.
Pruvost J. Dictionnaires et nouvelles technologies. P.: Presses universitaires de France – PUF, 2000.
Pruvost J. Quelques concepts lexicographiques opératoires à promouvoir au seuil du XXIe siècle Jean Pruvost // Éla. Études de linguistique appliquée. 2005. No. 137.
Quemada B. Notes sur lexicographie et dictionnairique // Cahiers de lexicologie. 1987. No. 51.
Rastier F. Sémantique interprétative. P.: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.
Rey Ch. Dictionnaire et société. P.: Honoré Champion, 2020.
Saussure F. de. Cours de linguistique générale. P.: Editions le Mono, 2021.
Sedykh A. P., Emanuele V., Kugan E. I. Linguistic and cultural identity: Epistemological review // Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. 2022. Vol. 8. No. 3.
Sedykh A. P., Ivanishcheva O. N., Koreneva A. V., Ryzhkova I. V. Modern philological knowledge: Anthropocentrism and linguistic identity // International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE). 2018. Vol. 7. No. 4.38.
Tabachnick M. Psychomécanique du langage et sémiotique du texte littéraire. Sarrebruck: Ed. Universitaires Européennes, 2011.
Weinreich U. Explorations en théorie sémantique. Présentation, traduction de l’anglais et commentaires de Marie-Noëlle Gary-Prieur. Arras: Artois Presses Université, 2009.
Русский
