GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2024. № 5. P. 1692-1698.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240244

The strategy of negative politeness in the judicial discourse of the USA and Canada (based on the proceedings of the Supreme Court of the USA and the Supreme Court of Canada)

Dmitrieva Elena Aleksandrovna
RUDN University; Russian Academy of Foreign Trade


Submitted: 08.04.2024
Abstract. The purpose of the study is to identify the linguistic specifics of the implementation of a negative politeness strategy in the judicial discourse of the United States and Canada. The research is carried out in line with pragmatic and sociolinguistic approaches to the analysis of discourse. The article examines the linguistic means of English at different levels, which constitute the characteristic features of negative politeness in Western culture as a means of mitigating threats to the addressee’s face. The author analyzes the polite formulas for expressing requests, apologies and gratitude in terms of qualitative and quantitative differences in the form of treatment. The scientific novelty is due to the application of a discursive approach to the study of linguistic features of the implementation of the politeness strategy in American and Canadian judicial discourse, which allowed us to obtain new data on the material of direct speech interaction. As a result of the study, it was found that the implementation of negative politeness in the American and Canadian versions of judicial discourse is characterized by the use of different status forms of addressing judges and lawyers, a higher degree of frequency of using requests without mitigating the threat to a person in the speech of judges of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Key words and phrases: прагматика дискурса, социолингвистическая природа дискурса, судебный дискурс, Верховный суд США, Верховный суд Канады, стратегия негативной вежливости, pragmatics of discourse, sociolinguistic nature of discourse, judicial discourse, Supreme Court of the USA, Supreme Court of Canada, strategy of negative politeness
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Arkhipova D. I. Osobennosti realizatsii strategii kosvennoi vezhlivosti v ramkakh kommunikativnykh strategii politicheskogo mediadiskursa (na materiale vystupleniya M. Zedera v tok-shou «Markus Lants») // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2024. T. 17. Vyp. 2.
  2. Vychuzhanina E. V. Sotsiolingvisticheskaya model' vezhlivosti P. Braun i S. Levinsona: kritika evrotsentrichnosti i kross-kul'turnyi potentsial // Yazyk i kul'tura: sbornik statei XXX mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Tomsk, 2020.
  3. Galyashina E. I. Sudebnaya lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza. M.: Prospekt, 2022.
  4. Karasik V. I. Diskurs // Diskurs-Pi. 2015. № 3-4 (12).
  5. Karasik V. I. Yazyk sotsial'nogo statusa. M.: Institut yazykoznaniya RAN, 1991.
  6. Krasovskaya O. V. Sudebnyi etiket // Yurislingvistika. 2008. № 9.
  7. Larina T. V. Kategoriya vezhlivosti i stil' kommunikatsii: sopostavlenie angliiskikh i russkikh kul'turnykh traditsii. M.: Rukopisnye pamyatniki drevnei Rusi, 2009.
  8. Palashevskaya I. V. Statusnye kharakteristiki uchastnikov sudebnogo diskursa // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2015a. № 9-10 (104).
  9. Palashevskaya I. V. Sudebnyi diskurs // Diskurs-Pi. 2015b. № 3-4 (12).
  10. Palashevskaya I. V. Sudebnyi diskurs: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2023.
  11. Rudneva E. A. Strategii lingvisticheskoi vezhlivosti v spontannom rechevom vzaimodeistvii: diss. … k. filol. n. SPb., 2018.
  12. Safarkhodzhaeva Z. A., Zabirova N. F., Mukhamadieva Kh. R. Kul'tura rechi, rechevoe povedenie, rechevoi etiket // Endless Light in Science. 2023. № iyun'.
  13. Fomina O. A., Potanina O. Yu. Rechevoi etiket kak chast' lingvokul'turologii. Ekologicheskii podkhod // Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal. 2020. T. 9. № 3 (32).
  14. Formanovskaya N. I. Vy skazali: «Zdravstvuite!» (rechevoi etiket v nashem obshchenii). M.: Znanie, 1989.
  15. Blum-Kulka S. Discourse Pragmatics // Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction: in 2 vols. / ed. by T. A. van Dijk. L.: SAGE publications, 1997. Vol. 2. Discourse as Social Interaction.
  16. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  17. Leech G. Principles of Pragmatics. N. Y.: Longman, 1983.
  18. Neumann R. K., Simon Sh. Legal Writing. N. Y.: Aspen Publishers, 2011.
  19. Ozyumenko V. Addressing a Judge in National Varieties of English // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2020. № 24 (1).

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru