GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2024. № 5. P. 1425-1430.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240206

The linguoconcept of PRIVACY in J. Franzen’s essay “The Imperial Bedroom” (1998)

Kim Yulia Vitalievna
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation


Submitted: 02.04.2024
Abstract. The aim of the research is to propose an interpretation of the linguoconcept PRIVACY through the prism of the works by the American writer J. Franzen, in development of previously expressed interpretations. J. Franzen’s essay “The Imperial Bedroom” (1998) was chosen as the research material. The paper analyzes the changes in the life of the American society against the backdrop of the increasing role of state and corporate technological control in different spheres of an individual’s life; it identifies the link between the thematic originality of J. Franzen’s essay collection “How to Be Alone” and social processes in the USA at the end of the last century; and reveals the originality of the linguoconcept PRIVACY in J. Franzen’s system of values based on the material of the essay “The Imperial Bedroom”. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the presentation of the linguoconcept PRIVACY as interpreted by J. Franzen through the opposition of the states of public space – visibility / PRIVACY – invisibility. As a result, the paper shows that the linguoconcept PRIVACY, previously associated with the state of invisibility, in J. Franzen’s interpretation has incorporated the public space, depriving the individual of the opportunity to be visible in the public space and exposing his vulnerability in private life. The results obtained are extremely important for modern American studies as they open up opportunities for further research on the linguoconcept PRIVACY taking into account current socio-political issues.
Key words and phrases: Дж. Франзен, лингвоконцепт PRIVACY, публичное пространство, диджитализация, J. Franzen, linguoconcept of PRIVACY, public space, digitalization
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Andreeva I. V. Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v russkoi i amerikanskoi kul'turakh: aksiologicheskii aspekt // Rossiya i ATR. 2007. № 2.
  2. Afanas'eva E. A. Konfidentsial'nost' onlain i oflain // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 4 «Gosudarstvo i pravo». 2018. № 4.
  3. Gadzhiev Kh. I. Zashchita chastnoi zhizni v tsifrovuyu epokhu // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2019. № 6.
  4. Glinskaya N. P. Yuridicheskii termin ‘privacy’ kak predmet sistemno-dinamicheskogo issledovaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 19 «Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya». 2010. № 2.
  5. Kim Yu. V. Sub"ektnyi narrativ v romane Dzh. Franzena «Svoboda» (2010) v svete paradigmy postpostmodernizma // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2023. T. 16. Vyp. 6.
  6. Larina T. V. ‘Privacy’, ili avtonomiya lichnosti, kak vazhneishii kontsept angliiskoi kul'tury // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Russkii i inostrannye yazyki i metodika ikh prepodavaniya». 2003. № 1.
  7. Lysenkova V. N. Yazykovaya reprezentatsiya kontsepta PRIVACY (na materiale idiomaticheskikh vyrazhenii angliiskogo yazyka) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2022. T. 15. Vyp. 12.
  8. Sardar Z., Devis M. Pochemu lyudi nenavidyat Ameriku? M.: Prospekt, 2003.
  9. Stepanova S. Yu. Khudozhestvennyi tekst kak istochnik lingvokul'turologicheskoi informatsii v mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2021. № 3-2.
  10. Berman E. Regulating Domestic Intelligence Collection // Washington & Lee Law Review. 2014. Vol. 71 (1).
  11. Best J. S., Krueger S. K., Ladewig J. Trends: Privacy in the Information Age // The Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 70. No. 3.
  12. Bjørio L. V. Freedom from Interference: Decisional Privasy as a Dimension of Consumer Privacy Online // Academy of Marketing Science Review. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-024-00273-x
  13. Gassar U. Recording Privacy Law: Reflections on the Future Relationship Among Law, Technology, and Privacy // Harvard Law Review Forum. 2016. Vol. 130.
  14. Hafizov A. The Concept of Politeness in English Linguistic Culture // Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences. 2022. Vol. 2. Iss. 12.
  15. Turculeț M. Ethical Issues Concerning Online Social Networks // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. Vol. 149.
  16. Véliz C. Privacy Is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data. L.: Bantam Press, 2021.
  17. Véliz C. The Internet and Privacy // Ethics and the Contemporary World / ed. by David Edmonds. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru