GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2024. № 3. P. 675-681.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240095

Othello and his “tragic flaw”

Kovalevskaya Tatyana Vyacheslavovna
Russian State University for the Humanities


Submitted: 07.01.2024
Abstract. The aim of the research is to further develop the previously proposed interpretations of “Othello” as the tragedy of a person who attempts to take the kind of place in the universe that is not rightfully theirs and they cannot handle because of their finite created nature. The research is novel in that it presents “Othello” as a tragedy of the Fall, a clash between human will and God’s providential Design; a human being attempts to place themself above the Design, and that results in destroying not the Design, which is impossible, but the human being themself. The article proposes wrath as Othello’s tragic flaw; wrath is a cardinal sin and at the same time the state that can be common to both God and human beings, the state that leads a person to judge their neighbor and to act as jury, judge, and executioner. Our findings show that “Othello” is part of what we called Shakespeare’s overarching plot and is closely tied with the problematics of other tragedies, particularly “Hamlet” and “Romeo and Juliet”. Consequently, “Othello” emerges as part of Shakespeare’s “overarching plot” that tells stories of the Bard’s characters seeking self-deification, that is, seeking to impose their will on the universe and ultimately to overcome their created human nature.
Key words and phrases: смертные грехи, гнев, самообожение, сквозной сюжет Шекспира, культура чести, cardinal sins, wrath, self-deification, Shakespeare’s overarching plot, culture of honor
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Anikst A. A. Shekspir. Remeslo dramaturga. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1975.
  2. Aristotel'. Poetika. Ritorika. SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2007.
  3. Doroshin B. A. Perspektiva formirovaniya sverkhcheloveka: psikhotekhnologicheskii aspekt // Voprosy novogo myshleniya v XXI veke. 2018. № 1-1.
  4. Ershova I. V. Otello // Shekspirovskaya entsiklopediya: v 2-kh t. / sost. i nauch. red. I. O. Shaitanov. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2022. T. 1.
  5. Zagidulina T. A. Formy transgumanizma v tvorchestve V. Pelevina 1990-2000-kh godov // Teorii. Kontseptsii. Problemy. 2023. № 2 (53).
  6. Ivanov Vyach. Shekspir i Servantes // Ivanov Vyach. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4-kh t. Bryussel', 1979. T. 4.
  7. Kantor V. K. Gamlet kak «khristianskii voin» // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 5.
  8. Kovalevskaya T. V. Mifologicheskii transgumanizm v russkoi literature: Dostoevskii i Serebryanyi vek. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2018.
  9. Kovalevskaya T. V. Ponyatie sud'by v razlichnykh kul'turakh, ego formy i prikladnaya znachimost' // Rossiya i Zapad: dialog kul'tur: sbornik statei XXIII mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii (g. Moskva, 25-27 marta 2021 g.). M.: Tsentr po izucheniyu vzaimodeistviya kul'tur, 2021. Vyp. 23.
  10. Kovalevskaya T. V., Vagizova F. A., Semenyuk E. V. Istoriya, literatura i kul'tura Velikobritanii. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2012.
  11. Komarova V. P. Shekspir i Bibliya. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 1998.
  12. Pinskii L. E. Shekspir. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1971.
  13. Samarin R. Realizm Shekspira. M., 1964.
  14. Shaitanov I. O. Shekspir. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2013.
  15. Bostrom N. A History of Transhumanist Thought // Journal of Evolution & Technology. 2005. Vol. 14. Iss. 1.
  16. Campbell B., Manning J. The Rise of Victimhood Culture: Microaggressions, Safe Spaces, and the New Culture Wars. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
  17. Frodeman R. Transhumanism, Nature, and the Ends of Science. N. Y. – L.: Routledge, 2019.
  18. Fukuyama F. Transhumanism // Foreign Policy. 2009. October 23. https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/23/transhumanism/
  19. Guroian V. Rallying the Really Human Thing: The Moral Imagination in Politics, Literature, and Everyday Life. Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2005.
  20. Milward P. Catholicism of Shakespeare’s Plays. Southampton, 1997.
  21. Mutschmann H., Wentersdorf K. Shakespeare and Catholicism. N. Y., 1952.
  22. Pearce J. “Othello” in a Nutshell // The Imaginative Conservative. 2020. November 16. https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2020/11/othello-nutshell-joseph-pearce.html
  23. Vickers B. Appropriating Shakespeare. Contemporary Critical Quarrels. New Haven – L., 1993.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru