Stratification of terms in the e-sports discourse space
Tyurin Pavel Vladilenovich
Moscow City University, Samara Branch
Submitted: 02.09.2024
Abstract. The aim of the research is to identify the specifics of terminology in the semantic and structural aspects within the English-language e-sports discourse space. The article presents e-sports terms, categorized based on their semantics in professional communication: universal, genre-oriented, and unique terms. The work also defines these concepts and provides examples of each category of terms. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the article formulates a definition of the term “e-sports discourse space”, reveals its structure, classifies terms according to the criterion of semantic significance in the e-sports discourse space (by semantic significance, we mean the recurrence of the term in most of the semantic fields of the e-sports discourse space), and analyzes lexical units of the basic elements of e-sports. The research findings show that the set of lexical units that make up the terminology of the e-sports discourse space can be applied to all e-sports disciplines, as well as to specific genres of e-sports disciplines, and also to a single e-sports discipline.
Key words and phrases: дискурсивное пространство, киберспортивный дискурс, киберспортивное дискурсивное пространство, термин, discourse space, e-sports discourse, e-sports discourse space, term
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Akhmanova O. S. Ekstralingvisticheskie i vnutrilingvisticheskie faktory v funktsionirovanii i razvitii yazyka // Teoreticheskie problemy sovremennogo sovetskogo yazykoznaniya / pod red. V. V. Vinogradova. M.: Nauka, 1964.
Vinokur G. O. O nekotorykh yavleniyakh slovoobrazovaniya v russkoi tekhnicheskoi terminologii // Trudy Moskovskogo instituta istorii, filosofii i literatury: sbornik statei po yazykovedeniyu. M.: LITERA, 1939.
Vokhrysheva E. V., Tyurin P. V. Kibersportivnoe diskursivnoe prostranstvo: teoreticheskie aspekty analiza // Focus on Language Education and Research. 2022. T. 3. № 1.
Golovanova E. I. Vvedenie v kognitivnoe terminovedenie: ucheb. posobie. Izd-e 3-e, ster. M.: Flinta, 2011.
Grinev-Grinevich S. V. Vvedenie v terminovedenie. M.: Akademiya, 2008.
Kandelaki T. L. Semantika i motivirovannost' terminov / AN SSSR, kom. nauch.-tekh. terminologii. M.: Nauka, 1977.
Karasik V. I. Diskursivnaya konvergentsiya // Lingvisticheskaya limologiya: materialy vseross. nauch. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem. M.: Izd-vo MGOU, 2022.
Kibrik A. A. Modus, zhanr i drugie parametry klassifikatsii diskursov // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2009. № 2.
Kozlovskaya O. G. Kognitivnye i strukturno-semanticheskie osobennosti morskoi terminologii (na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov): diss. … k. filol. n. SPb., 2005.
Kutlaliev T. Kh. Zhanrovaya tipologiya komp'yuternykh igr: problema sistematizatsii khudozhestvennykh sredstv: avtoref. diss. … k. kul't. M., 2014.
Plotnikova S. N. Diskurs i diskursivnoe prostranstvo // Diskurs kak universal'naya matritsa verbal'nogo vzaimodeistviya / otv. red. O. A. Suleimanova. M.: LENAND, 2018.
Cabré Castellví M. T. Theories of Terminology. Their Description, Prescription and Explanation // Terminology.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication. 2003. Vol. 9 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/term.9.2.03cab
Temmerman R. Questioning the Univocity Ideal. The Difference between Sociocognitive Terminology and Traditional Terminology // HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business. 2017. Vol. 10 (18). http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v10i18.25412
Русский
