GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2024. № 10. P. 3638-3643.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240514

The linguocultural concept “good” in Russian and German linguistic consciousness: The conceptual component

Nevolina Ksenia Viktorovna, Tretiakova Evgenia Valerievna
Irkutsk State Medical University

Baikal State University


Submitted: 06.09.2024
Abstract. The study aims to determine the conceptual characteristics of the concept “good” in Russian and German linguistic cultures. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that the concept “good” is explored in a comparative aspect based on the materials of the Russian and German languages to identify and describe its national cultural features. As a result, the study has revealed that in Russian linguistic culture, “good” is conceptually understood as a morally positive principle in a person, opposed to evil, expressed in actions, feelings, and aspirations, possessing moral value, benefiting and bringing joy to others, and bringing people closer. In German linguistic consciousness, “good” is conceptualized as a deed that is appropriate, useful, beneficial, pleasant, possessing spiritual value, meeting certain expectations, norms, and goals, and possible with a friendly attitude. It has been found that the content minimum of the concept “good” largely coincides in Russian and German linguistic cultures. The main difference lies in the fact that in Russian linguistic consciousness, “good” is primarily perceived as a positive moral principle of a person, while such an understanding of “good” is absent in German. In addition, in German linguistic culture, “good” is conceptualized as a deed, while in Russian linguistic culture, it is understood as actions, aspirations, and feelings. In both cultures, its benefit for other people and the humaneness of a person doing good are noted.
Key words and phrases: концепт «добро», понятийная составляющая концепта «добро», русская лингвокультура, немецкая лингвокультура, concept “good”, conceptual component of the concept “good”, Russian linguistic culture, German linguistic culture
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Apresyan R. G. Dobro // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Mysl', 2010a.
  2. Apresyan R. G. Moral' // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Mysl', 2010b.
  3. Apresyan Yu. D. Izbrannye trudy: v 2 t. Izd-e 2-e, ispr. i dop. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury; Vostochnaya literatura, 1995. T. 1. Leksicheskaya semantika.
  4. Afanas'eva O. M. Kontsept «nravstvennost'» v sovremennom mediaprostranstve // Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul'turologiya. Vostokovedenie. 2014. № 12 (134).
  5. Vorkachev S. G. Kakoyu meroyu merite: ideya vozdayaniya v lingvokul'ture: monografiya. M.: Flinta, 2020.
  6. Vorkachev S. G. Leksicheskoe napolnenie formuly mzdoimstva po dannym natsional'nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka // Rusistika bez granitsi. Mezhdunarodno nauchno spisanie. 2024. T. VIII. Kn. 1.
  7. Vorkachev S. G. Lingvokul'turologiya, yazykovaya lichnost', kontsept: stanovlenie antropotsentricheskoi paradigmy v yazykoznanii // Filologicheskie nauki. 2001. № 1.
  8. Vorkachev S. G. Lyubov' kak lingvokul'turnyi kontsept: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2007.
  9. Vorkachev S. G. Schast'e kak lingvokul'turnyi kontsept: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2004.
  10. Karasik V. I. Yazykovaya matritsa kul'tury: monografiya. M.: Gnozis, 2013.
  11. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs: monografiya. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002.
  12. Karasik V. I. Yazykovye kamertony smysla: monografiya. M.: Gosudarstvennyi institut russkogo yazyka im. A. S. Pushkina, 2024.
  13. Kutyrev V. A. Poslednee tselovanie. Chelovek kak traditsiya. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2015.
  14. Likhachev D. S. Kontseptosfera russkogo yazyka // Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 1993. T. 52. № 1.
  15. Men'shikova S. I. Kontsepty «dobro» i «zlo» v strukture metakontsepta «nravstvennost'» // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Filologiya». 2009. № 3.
  16. Mokrushina E. Yu. Kontsept «dobryi» kak eticheskii fenomen lingvokul'tury: diss. … k. filol. n. Kemerovo, 2008.
  17. Nevolina K. V. Diskursivnoe prostranstvo morali: soderzhanie, struktura, spetsifika (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2022. T. 15. Vyp. 11.
  18. Safonova N. V. Mental'naya i yazykovaya reprezentatsiya kontsepta Blago/Dobro v russkom yazykovom soznanii: diss. … d. filol. n. Tambov, 2004.
  19. Slyshkin G. G. Lingvokul'turnye kontsepty i metakontsepty: monografiya. Volgograd: Peremena, 2004.
  20. Stepanov Yu. S. Konstanty. Slovar' russkoi kul'tury. Opyt issledovaniya. M., 1997.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru