Soft and hard variants of the institutionality of service communication
Yang Can
Pushkin State Russian Language Institute
Submitted: 01.03.2023
Abstract. The paper suggests the existence of soft and hard variants of service communication and proposes an evaluation model for analysing institutionality. The aim of the research is to classify the texts of service communication according to their belonging to the soft or hard variant of institutional discourse on the basis of the identified parameters for measuring the institutionality. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the following: 1) in conducting a systematic study of service communication within the framework of institutional discourse; 2) in considering the issue of institutionality in service communication in a dialectical manner by dividing the category in question into soft and hard variants according to the degree of institutionality; 3) in clarifying the general parameters for evaluating institutionality of different types of discourse. The following results have been obtained in the process of conducing a comprehensive study of service communication from the perspective of the pragmalinguistic approach. Firstly, based on the analysis of the textual materials of service communication, the hypothesis of the existence of soft and hard varieties in institutional discourse, proposed by V. I. Karasik, has been confirmed. Secondly, the institutionality of discourse is not rigid, but flexible, and it must be evaluated in accordance with specific variable conditions, including cliché usage, formality, compulsion, degree of familiarity of communicants, flexibility of rules etc.
Key words and phrases: сервисная коммуникация, институциональный дискурс, мягкий и жесткий варианты институциональности, service communication, institutional discourse, soft and hard variants of institutionality
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Vlasova T. N. Internet kak effektivnyi kanal kommunikatsii s klientami v servisnoi deyatel'nosti // Gumanitarnye tekhnologii v sovremennom mire: mat. VI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Kaliningrad, 17-19 maya 2018 g.). Kaliningrad: Zapadnyi filial RANKhiGS, 2018.
Goikhman O. Ya. Gumanitarnyi servis: sistematizatsiya i obuchenie // Gumanitarnye tekhnologii v sovremennom mire: mat. V vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uch. (g. Kaliningrad, 25-27 maya 2017 g.). Kaliningrad: Izdatel'stvo i tipografiya gazety «Strazh Baltiki» Minoborony Rossii, 2017.
Goikhman O. Ya. O lichnostnoi i rolevoi kommunikatsii v sfere servisa i turizma // Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2011. № 7 (26).
Goikhman O. Ya., Goncharova L. M., Koshlyakova M. O., Nadeina T. M. Biznes-kommunikatsii v servise: dokumentatsionnye, rechevye, imidzhevye i reklamnye tekhnologii. M.: INFRA-M, 2017.
Goikhman O. Ya., Nadeina T. M. Rechevaya kommunikatsiya: uchebnik / pod red. O. Ya. Goikhmana. M.: INFRA-M, 2018.
Danilenko N. N., Rubtsova N. V. Servisologiya. M.: KnoRus, 2019.
Danilova S. A. Tipologiya diskursa // Gumanitarnye, sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki. 2015. № 1.
Dzaraeva N. A., Shurakova D. D. Strategii i taktiki meditsinskogo diskursa // Problemy romano-germanskoi filologii, pedagogiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov. 2014. № 10.
Zalozhnykh V. V. Tipologiya diskursa v lingvistike: fraktal'nyi podkhod // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva. 2017. T. 2. № 3.
Karasik V. I. Diskursologiya kak napravlenie kommunikativnoi lingvistiki // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2016. № 1 (21).
Karasik V. I. O kategoriyakh diskursa // Yazykovaya lichnost': sotsiolingvisticheskie i emotivnye aspekty: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd – Saratov: Peremena, 1998.
Karasik V. I. O tipakh diskursa. 2000a. URL: https://uchebana5.ru/cont/3647593-p2.html
Karasik V. I. Etnokul'turnye tipy institutsional'nogo diskursa // Etnokul'turnaya spetsifika rechevoi deyatel'nosti: sb. obzorov / otv. red. N. N. Troshina. M.: Izd-vo Instituta nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2000b.
Karasik V. I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena, 2002.
Kozhemyakin E. A. Yuridicheskii diskurs kak kul'turnyi fenomen: struktura i smysloobrazovanie // Yurislingvistika. 2011. № 1 (11).
Ryukova A. R. K voprosu o klassifikatsii diskursa // Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2016. T. 21. № 1.
Shiryaeva T. A. Kognitivnaya model' delovogo diskursa: monografiya. Pyatigorsk: Izd-vo Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2006.
Yan Tsan'. Servisnaya kommunikatsiya v seti Internet // Kommunikatsiya – Obshchestvo – Chelovek: sb. nauch. trud. I nats. nauch.-prakt. konf. nauchno-pedagogicheskikh i prakticheskikh rabotnikov s mezhdunar. uch. (g. Yaroslavl', 13-15 oktyabrya 2022 g.) / pod red. T. B. Kolyshkinoi i I. V. Shustinoi. Yaroslavl': SOYuZ-PRESS, 2022.
Yan Tsan', Goncharova L. M. Servisnaya kommunikatsiya kak statusno-orientirovannyi tip diskursa: yazykovye i kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie kharakteristiki // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Sovremennaya kommunikativistika. 2022. T. 11. № 6.
Wodak R. Disorders of Discourse. L. – N. Y.: Longman, 1996.
Русский
