Gerasimova Svetlana Anatolievna
Moscow City University
Submitted: 13.02.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to reveal the key features of literary genres in Denis Diderot’s works. Diderot was one of the most prominent figures in French culture – philosopher, novelist, dramatist and art theorist, who made a significant contribution to the literary enlightenment of the French society. The scientific novelty of this research lies in carrying out a comprehensive analysis and determining the originality of Diderot’s literary criticism contribution to the development and formation of such literary genres of the Enlightenment as literary essays, dialogues, moral tales, artistic and critic essays, which became a historical and literary phenomenon of that period. Diderot’s writings are studied within the dynamics of his ideas, and this approach allows us to define him as a versatile person and sophisticated thinker-encyclopaedist. The results of the research prove that Diderot as a paradoxical figure of the French Enlightenment experimented with the genres incorporating the ordinary into the theoretical, literary and philosophical contexts that had a significant influence on the existing literary genres and provided the emergence of new ones in the XVIII century. Denis Diderot’s works are of educational nature as he managed to influence the public opinion and helped the thinking viewers and readers to form judgements on issues of universal significance for humanity based on common sense.
Key words and phrases: Дени Дидро, аналитическое художественное эссе, диалоги, морализаторские повести, художественная критика, критический очерк, Denis Diderot, analytical literary essay, dialogues, moral tales, art criticism, critical essay
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Akimova A. A. Didro. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1963.
Arkin D. Didro kak khudozhestvennyi kritik // Didro D. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10-ti t. / pod obshch. red. I. K. Luppola. M. – L.: Academia, 1946. T. 6. Iskusstvo.
Bibler V. S. Vek Prosveshcheniya i kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. D. Didro i I. Kant. 1997. URL: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/B/bibler-vladimir-solomonovich/vek-prosvescheniya-i-kritika-sposobnosti-suzhdeniya-d-didro-i-i-kant
Budyka Zhitkova O. K. Novelly Marmontelya v russkom i ispanskom muzykal'nom teatre vtoroi poloviny XVIII veka // Kul'turnaya zhizn' Yuga Rossii. 2013. № 4 (51).
Veselovskii A. Didro, Deni // Entsiklopedicheskii slovar': v 86-ti t. SPb.: Brokgauz – Efron, 1893. T. 10A.
Gerasimova S. A. Vklad v orientiruyushchee znanie i ideya informatsionnogo proryva: entsiklopediya XVIII veka // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya lingvistika. 2020. T. 6. № 2.
Dlugach T. B. Deni Didro. M.: Mysl', 1986.
Dmitrovskii A. L. Zhanr esse: k probleme teorii // Chelyabinskii gumanitarii. 2013. № 3 (24).
Zagorodneva K. V. Original'nost' khudozhestvennoi kritiki D. Didro (na primere «Salona 1765 goda») // Mirovaya kul'tura XVII-XVIII vekov kak metatekst: diskursy, zhanry, stili: mat. mezhdunar. nauch. simpoziuma «Vos'mye Lafontenovskie chteniya». Seriya “Symposium”. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo, 2002. Vyp. 26.
Kagan M. S. Iskusstvoznanie i khudozhestvennaya kritika: izbrannye stat'i. SPb.: Petropolis, 2001.
Krotov A. A. Didro kak istorik filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 2021. № 3.
Mazurova N. V. Pervye raboty po psikhologii slepykh i glukhikh lyudei: «Pis'ma» D. Didro. Istoriko-psikhologicheskaya versiya vozniknoveniya // Defektologiya. 2004. № 1.
Merkulova M. G., Gerasimova S. A. Literaturnye opyty entsiklopedista XVIII veka: Zhan-Fransua Marmontel' // Nauchnyi dialog. 2022. T. 11. № 8.
Mineeva I. N. Literaturno-khudozhestvennoe esse kak zhanr uchebnoi raboty v vysshei shkole // Filologicheskii klass. 2016. № 2 (44).
Montandon A. Gostepriimstvo: etnograficheskaya mechta? 2004. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2004/1/gostepriimstvo-etnograficheskaya-mechta.html
Panov A. A. 2005.02.019. Brossmann R. Funktsii zhanra dialoga: Dialogi Platona i «Plemyannik Ramo» Didro. Brossmann R. Funktionen der Dialogform: Platons Dialoge und Diderots Le Neveu de Rameau // PhiN: Philologie im Netz. – B., 2003. – N 26. – S. 1-36. Rezhim dostupa: p26t1.htm // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 7 «Literaturovedenie». 2005. № 2.
Razumovskaya M. V. Roman-dialog i filosofskii dialog u Didro: sintez nauchnogo i khudozhestvennogo poznaniya («Plemyannik Ramo» i «Son D’Alambera») // Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta. Seriya 2. 1984. № 20. Vyp. 4.
Rosh D. Puteshestviya // Mir Prosveshcheniya. Istoricheskii slovar' / pod red. V. Ferrone i D. Rosha. M.: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2003.
Sementkovskii R. I. Deni Didro (1717-1784). Ego zhizn' i literaturnaya deyatel'nost'. Biograficheskii ocherk. 1896. URL: https://thelib.ru/books/sementkovskiy_r/deni_didro_1717_1784_ego_zhizn_i_literaturnaya_deyatelnost-read.html
Sinel'nikova G. P. Satiricheskie dialogi (razgovory) kak original'nyi zhanr zhurnal'noi publitsistiki XVIII veka // Kul'tura i tekst. 1998. № 4.
Albertan-Coppola S., Decote G. Profil – Diderot: Supplément au voyage de Bougainville: analyse littéraire de l’œuvre. P.: Hatier, 2006.
André V. Diderot. Contes politiques et politique du conte // Féeries. Politique du conte. 2006. N. 3. DOI: 10.4000/feeries.149
Laffitte M. Diderot: hésitations autour de la promesse (Histoire de Madame de la Carlière) // Revue romane. 1992. Vol. 27. N. 1.
Русский
