Semiosis in a literary text: Authenticity and irreality
Dzyubenko Anna Igorevna
Sothern Federal University
Submitted: 13.03.2023
Abstract. The aim of the research is to identify the linguistic means of a literary text that condition the correctness of the reader’s receptive and interpretative activities, taking into account extralinguistic and intralinguistic factors, which contributes to the effective decoding of the aesthetic sign in the coordinates of perceiving the irreal as authentic based on the material of Yu. K. Olesha’s fairy tale story “The Three Fat Men”. The scientific novelty of the research lies in studying the pragmasemantic potential of the lexico-grammatical units and modalities that determine the reader’s perception of the irreal as authentic in a literary text. As a result, it has been found that fiction and reality form a complex synthesis in the process of creating a literary text. Semiosis in a literary text is characterised by the realisation of three stages – denotation, connotation and the determination of interpretation by the text itself, while the direction of the semiotic process depends upon authenticity and irreality, which are formed and function in a literary text in unity. The irreal is represented in such a text as authentic, which makes the problem of truth/falsity irrelevant in relation to the textual semantic space. The author’s intention forms the coordinates of semiosis of fiction, but the “filling” of these coordinates with the actual signs of the irreal and the authentic is realised only in the reader’s mind on the basis of the implicatures of modality of a literary text.
Key words and phrases: семиозис, художественный текст, достоверность, ирреальность, художественный вымысел, semiosis, literary text, authenticity, irreality, fiction
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aristotel'. Ob iskusstve poezii. M.: Goslitizdat, 1957.
Bart R. Mifologii. Izd-e 5-e. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2019.
Bakhtin M. M. Problema teksta: opyt filosofskogo analiza // Voprosy literatury. 1976. № 1.
Borukhov B. L. Ontologiya khudozhestvennogo teksta // Khudozhestvennyi tekst: ontologiya i interpretatsiya: sb. st. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, 1992.
Valentinova O. I., Denisenko V. N., Preobrazhenskii S. Yu., Rybakov M. A. Sistemnyi vzglyad kak osnova filologicheskoi mysli. M.: YaSK, 2016.
Dymarskii M. Ya. Norma tekstovosti i stilevoe var'irovanie // Khudozhestvennyi tekst: ontologiya i interpretatsiya: sb. st. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, 1992.
Zhenett Zh. Vymysel i slog: fictio et diction // Zhenett Zh. Figury: v 2-kh t. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh, 1998. T. 1-2.
Zel'dovich G. M. Vzaimopodobie smyslov i struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta // Slovo.ru: baltiiskii aktsent. 2020. № 1 (11).
Kleimenova V. Yu. Fiktsional'nost' i vymysel v khudozhestvennom tekste // Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. 2011. № 3.
Kostyrya A. V. Kategoriya vtorichnosti v ramkakh lingvistiki teksta, teorii semiozisa i kognitivnykh issledovanii // Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Istoriya i filologiya. 2021. № 1.
Krasnykh V. V. Tekst kak edinitsa diskursa // Mezhdunarodnaya yubileinaya sessiya, posvyashchennaya 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akad. V. V. Vinogradova: tez. dokl. M., 1995.
Kuznetsova Anna V. Pragmatika kul'turnykh kodov v khudozhestvennom tekste // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoi lingvistiki. 2021. № 3.
Leiderman N. L. Tekst i obraz // Filologicheskii klass. 2004. № 12.
Lotman Yu. M. Kul'tura i vzryv. M.: Gnozis, 1992.
Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 2010.
Lotman Yu. M. Tekst v tekste // Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 1981. Vyp. 567.
Meizerskii V. M. Problemy i perspektivy semiotiki teksta // Khudozhestvennyi tekst: ontologiya i interpretatsiya: sb. st. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, 1992.
Moskal'skaya O. I. Grammatika teksta. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1981.
Rozin V. M. Rasshiritel'noe istolkovanie semioticheskogo podkhoda // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2020. № 9.
Rudnev V. P. Morfologiya real'nosti: issledovaniya po filosofii teksta. M.: Gnozis, 1996.
Serkova N. I. Predposylki chleneniya teksta na sverkhfrazovom urovne // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1978. № 3.
Stepanov Yu. S. V mire semiotiki // Semiotika: antologiya / sost. Yu. S. Stepanov. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt; Delovaya kniga, 2001.
Feshchenko V. V. Khudozhestvennaya kommunikatsiya: ot semioticheskikh modelei k lingvoesteticheskoi teorii // Slovo.ru: baltiiskii aktsent. 2021. № 1 (12).
Shmid V. Narratologiya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2003.
Eko U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu. SPb.: Symposium, 2006.
Eko U. Rol' chitatelya. Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta. Izd-e 2-e, ispr. i dop. M.: AST; CORPUS, 2016.
Greimas A.-J. Semiotique et sciences socials. P.: Editions du Seuil, 1976.
Русский
