Representation of the legal concept of PROBATION in English legal terminology
Druzhininskaya Olga Vasil’evna, Titova Olya Zokirovna
Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of the Federal Penal Service of Russia
Samara Law Institute of the Federal Penal Service of Russia
Submitted: 08.11.2023
Abstract. The paper considers the representation of the legal concept of ‘probation’ in English legal terminology using the material of lexicographic sources. The aim of the study is to identify the semantic features of the lexeme ‘probation’, which is the basic term for naming the legal concept of ‘probation’ in English legal terminology. The authors determine the semantic scope and processes of change in the semantics of the word ‘probation’, analyze the relationship of the key term with other words representing the concept of probation. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the following: the study is the first to describe the semantics of the word ‘probation’ in English from diachronic and synchronic perspectives, as well as to identify the features of verbalization of the legal concept named by the term ‘probation’. As a result, it has been found that the process of testing, verification historically constituted the main semantic content of the analyzed word, which served as a basis for the further formation of the legal concept of ‘probation’. It is emphasized that the term ‘probation’ contains additional elements of the content of the legal concept, while the concept itself reflects the basic, essential features.
Key words and phrases: семантика, терминология, юридическая терминология, термин, probation, semantics, terminology, legal terminology, term
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Golovin B. N., Kobrin R. Yu. Lingvisticheskie osnovy ucheniya o terminakh: ucheb. posobie. M., 1987.
Grinev-Grinevich S. V. Terminovedenie: ucheb. posobie. M., 2008.
Kaurova E. M., Chepak O. A. Perevodcheskie oshibki kak rezul'tat lingvisticheskoi interferentsii u studentov neyazykovogo vuza pri rabote s angloyazychnymi tekstami yuridicheskoi napravlennosti // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2020. T. 13. Vyp. 8. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.8.54
Kozochkina I. D. Zakon o polnomochiyakh ugolovnykh sudov 1973 goda (Angliya) // Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh stran (Anglii, SShA, Frantsii, Germanii, Yaponii): sbornik zakonodatel'nykh materialov. M., 2007a.
Kozochkina I. D. Zakon ob ugolovnoi yustitsii 1991 goda (Angliya) // Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo zarubezhnykh stran (Anglii, SShA, Frantsii, Germanii, Yaponii): sbornik zakonodatel'nykh materialov. M., 2007b.
Leichik V. M. Terminovedenie: predmet, metody, struktura. M., 2009.
Litovchenko V. I. Semanticheskie osobennosti // Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta im. akademika M. F. Reshetneva. 2006. № 2.
Polosukhina O. V. Osobennosti deyatel'nosti sluzhby probatsii v Anglii // Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo. 2022. № 12 (216). http://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1329_2022_12_223
Popova E. P. Stanovlenie angliiskoi yuridicheskoi terminologii. M.: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet pravosudiya, 2017.
Superanskaya A. V., Podol'skaya N. V., Vasil'eva N. V. Obshchaya terminologiya: voprosy teorii. M., 1989.
Tatarinov V. A. Teoriya terminovedeniya: v 3-kh t. M., 1996. T. 1. Teoriya termina: istoriya i sovremennoe sostoyanie.
Khizhnyak S. P. Angliiskaya yuridicheskaya terminologiya v sinkhronii i diakhronii. Saratov, 2022.
Khizhnyak S. P. Osnovy kontastivnogo analiza yuridicheskikh terminosistem angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov // Aktual'nye problemy sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya i yuridicheskoi lingvistiki: sb. mat. IV mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. Moskva, 10-12 dekabrya 2019 g.). M.: Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi lingvisticheskii universitet, 2020.
Shabardina S. V. Stanovlenie terminosistemy prava v angliiskom yazyke: avtoref. diss.. k. filol. n. M., 2002.
Русский
