“Native Land” by A. I. Sofronov and “River” by A. E. Kulakovsky: Literary translations in the formation of Yakut poetry
Romanova Lidia Nikolaevna
Institute for Humanitarian Research and North Indigenous People Problems of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IHRNIPP SB RAS)
Submitted: 02.11.2023
Abstract. The aim of the research is to trace the process of creating new original, independent works by conducting a comparative analysis of the poetic structure of the works by the first Yakut poets – A. E. Kulakovsky’s “River” and A. I. Sofronov’s “Native Land” written based on the works by N. G. Tsyganov and N. I. Nemirovich-Danchenko. The paper examines the poetic structure of the Yakut texts – the type of the author’s narrative, subject organization, graphic and rhythmic-syntactic structure, composition, narrative-speech and motif-figurative system – in comparison with the original Russian texts. The research is novel in that it is the first in Yakut literary studies to consider the famous works by the first Yakut poets not from the perspective of their equivalence (in terms of fidelity/infidelity, translatability/non-translatability) to the source text, but from the position of creative rendering of someone else’s foreign-language text in accordance with one’s own artistic experience, worldview and national poetic traditions. As a result of a bi-directional comparative analysis of the poetic texts by the Yakut poets A. E. Kulakovsky and A. I. Sofronov (the literary translation / the source text; Kulakovsky’s “River” / Sofronov’s “Native Land”), it was found that according to the nature of the author’s narrative, subject organization, spatial-temporal coordinates, rhythmic-syntactic structure, plot-compositional structure, narrative-speech structure, these works are original, author’s works included in the treasury of national poetry.
Key words and phrases: якутская поэзия, художественный перевод, поэтическая структура, субъектная организация, ритмико-синтаксический строй, композиция, Yakut poetry, literary translation, poetic structure, subject organization, rhythmic-syntactic structure, composition
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Arzamazov A. A. Mezhdu «svoim» i «chuzhim»: yazykovye i khudozhestvennye realii, problemy, perspektivy literatury narodov Krainego Severa i Dal'nego Vostoka // Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. 2021. № 6 (2).
Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva: sb. izbr. tr. M.: Iskusstvo, 1979.
Vasil'ev G. M. Yakutskoe stikhoslozhenie. Yakutsk: Yakut. knizh. izd-vo, 1965.
Veselovskii A. N. Genezis liricheskogo yazyka // Veselovskii A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika. M.: LKI, 2008.
Gasparov M. L. Tri tipa romanticheskoi elegii // Gasparov M. L. Izbrannye trudy: v 3-kh t. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1997. T. 2.
Gachechiladze G. R. Khudozhestvennyi perevod i literaturnye vzaimosvyazi. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Sov. pisatel', 1980.
Ginzburg L. Ya. O lirike. Izd-e 2-e, dop. L.: Sov. pisatel', 1974.
Gumbol'dt V. fon. Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu. M.: Progress, 1984.
D'yachkovskaya M. N. Izbrannye raboty: voprosy yakutskogo stikhoslozheniya. Yakutsk: IGIiPMNS SO RAN, 2015.
Zhorzh T. K. Perevod v sisteme natsional'noi poezii: zakonomernost' transformatsii // Prepodavatel' XXI vek. 2021. № 4-2. https://doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2021-4-441-454
Ibragimov M. I., Gumerov I. G. Semanticheskie transformatsii motivov v vol'nykh perevodakh Gabdully Tukaya iz russkoi poezii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2018. № 11-1 (89). https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-11-1.4
Komissarov V. N. Sovremennoe perevodovedenie. Kurs lektsii. M.: ETS, 1999.
Kulakovskaya L. R. Nauchnaya biografiya A. E. Kulakovskogo: lichnost' poeta i ego vremya. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2008.
Lotman Yu. M. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta. Struktura stikha. L.: Prosveshchenie, 1972.
Nikolaev S. G. Khudozhestvennyi perevod kak akt sozdaniya novogo teksta v novom (inom) kul'turno-yazykovom prostranstve // Praktiki i interpretatsii. 2016. T. 1 (3).
Pokatilova N. V. Edinstvennye svoego roda obraztsy // Ilin. 2000. № 4 (23).
Pokatilova N. V. Ot ustnoi traditsii k pis'mennoi v rannei literature. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2010.
Romanova I. V. Poetika Iosifa Brodskogo: lirika s kommunikativnoi tochki zreniya: avtoref. diss.. d. filol. n. Smolensk, 2007.
Ryabko E. I. Vzaimootnoshenie khudozhestvennykh mirov teksta originala i ego perevoda // Filologicheskii aspekt. 2018. № 5 (37).
Semenova V. G. Poeziya Anempodista Sofronova. Istoki. Problematika. Voprosy poetiki: ucheb. posobie. Yakutsk: YaGU, 2004.
Sivtseva-Maksimova P. V. Zhanrovaya tipologiya yakutskoi poezii. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2002.
Timofeev L. I. Osnovy teorii literatury. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1976.
Toburokov N. N. Stikh A. E. Kulakovskogo // A. E. Kulakovskii v kontekste istoriko-kul'turnogo razvitiya v KhKh v.: sb. st. Yakutsk: Izd-vo SO RAN, 2004.
Tomashevskii B. V. Teoriya literatury. Poetika: ucheb. posobie. M.: Aspekt Press, 1999.
Tynyanov Yu. N. Problema stikhotvornogo yazyka. M.: KomKniga, 2001.
Fedorov A. V. Osnovy obshchei teorii perevoda (lingvisticheskie problemy): ucheb. posobie. Izd-e 5-e. SPb.: Filologicheskii fakul'tet SPbGU, 2002.
Sherr B. P. Skrytoe novatorstvo: metrika, ritmika i strofika V. A. Komarovskogo // Ontologiya stikha: sb. st. SPb.: Filologicheskii fakul'tet SPbGU, 2000.
Shutemova N. V. Sopostavitel'nyi analiz iskhodnogo i perevodnogo tekstov v sootnoshenii s ponyatiem poetichnosti // Yazyk i kul'tura. 2020. № 50.
Eikhenbaum B. Anna Akhmatova: opyt analiza // Eikhenbaum B. O proze. O poezii: sb. st. L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1986.
Yakobson R. O lingvisticheskikh aspektakh perevoda // Voprosy teorii perevoda v zarubezhnoi lingvistike / otv. red. V. N. Komissarov. M., 1978.
Русский
