Organization and Semantic Relations within the Lexico-Semantic Field “Landscape Architecture” (by the Material of the English Language)
Kaneeva Anastasia Sergeevna, Bodnaruk Elena Vladimirovna
Northern Arctic Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
Submitted: 08.11.2022
Abstract. The aim of the study was to present the structure of the lexico-semantic field “Landscape architecture” by the material of the English language. The article identifies specific groups, subgroups and sub-subgroups of the field under study and also considers various types of semantic relations within it. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that it was the first to systematize the units of landscape vocabulary by applying the field approach. Currently, there are practically no works devoted to landscape vocabulary in linguistics, although landscape architecture and landscape design are rapidly developing areas that have an impact on human life. The results of the study showed that the lexico-semantic field “Landscape architecture” includes several lexico-semantic groups. The classification scheme for lexical units of the lexico-semantic field “Landscape architecture” reflects the semantic relations of inclusion and intersection of the field components and demonstrates such paradigmatic relations between lexemes as synonymy, antonymy, hypo-hyperonymic and part-whole relations, which indicate the organizational complexity of the studied field and its hierarchical structure.
Key words and phrases: лексико-семантическое поле, лексико-семантическая группа, семантические отношения, лексика сферы ландшафтной архитектуры, lexico-semantic field, lexico-semantic group, semantic relations, landscape architecture vocabulary
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Denisov P. N. Leksika russkogo yazyka i printsipy ee opisaniya. M.: Russkii yazyk, 1980.
Karaulov Yu. N. Obshchaya i russkaya ideografiya. M.: Nauka, 1976.
Kobozeva I. M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika. M.: Editorial URSS, 2000.
Kol'tsova O. V. Lingvokognitivnyi analiz leksiko-semanticheskikh grupp (na materiale LSG «Vozvyshennosti» v russkom i nemetskom yazykakh): diss. … k. filol. n. Saratov, 2011.
Kurenkova T. N. Leksiko-semanticheskoe pole i drugie polya v sovremennoi lingvistike // Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta im. akademika M. F. Reshetneva. 2006. № 4 (11).
Kyrkbaeva G. N. Strukturnye osobennosti ponyatii «semanticheskoe pole» i «leksiko-semanticheskoe pole» // Nauka, novye tekhnologii i innovatsii Kyrgyzstana. 2017. № 12.
Lavrenova O. A. Semantika kul'turnogo landshafta: avtoref. diss. … d. filoc. n. M., 2010.
Medvedeva N. A. Analiz leksiko-semanticheskoi gruppy slov (kompozitov) s obshchim komponentom «fitnes» // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. № 10-2 (76). URL: http://www.gramota.net/materials/2/2017/10-2/33.html
Peters L. P., Filatova N. I. K voprosu o leksiko-semanticheskom pole «Pishcha» v ispanskom yazyke // Universitetskie chteniya - 2015: mat. nauch.-metod. chtenii PGLU. Pyatigorsk: Izd-vo Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2015.
Romanova T. V., Khomenko A. Yu. Funktsionirovanie elementov semanticheskogo polya «Sotsial'naya znachimost'» v russkom i angliiskom yazykakh po dannym slovarnykh i korpusnykh istochnikov // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura. 2020. T. 17. № 1.
Rubleva O. L. Leksikologiya sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevostochnogo universiteta, 2004.
Filin F. P. O leksiko-semanticheskikh gruppakh slov // Ocherki po teorii yazykoznaniya. 1982. № 8.
Chistyakova E. V. Landshaftnaya kategorizatsiya i otsenka potentsiala landshaftnoi leksiki v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: diss. … k. filol. n. Tambov, 2015.
Egamnazarov Kh. Kh. O ponyatii leksiko-semanticheskogo polya v lingvistike // Uchenye zapiski Khudzhandskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. akademika B. Gafurova. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2018. № 1 (54).
Aničić B., Rechner I., Perica D. Structural Vocabulary of Cultural Landscape on the Island of Krk (Croatia) // Actacarasologia. 2004. No. 33/1. DOI: 10.3986/ac.v33i1.318
Horowitz S. Therapeutic Gardens and Horticultural Therapy: Growing Roles in Health Care // Alternative and Complementary Therapies. 2012. No. 18 (2). DOI: 10.1089/act.2012.18205
Jørgensen K. Semiotics in Landscape Design // Landscape Review. 1998. Vol. 4. No. 1.
Kreitzer M. J. What Are Healing Gardens. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 2016. URL: https://www.takingcharge.csh.umn.edu/explore-healing-practices/healing-environment/what-are-healing-gardens
Mumcu S., Tarakci E., Yılmaz S. Symbolic Landscapes and Their Spatial Components: Understanding the Environmental Design Vocabulary of Place Identity // Current World Environment. 2017. No. 12 (3). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320878218_Symbolic_Landscapes_and_Their_Spatial_Components_Understanding_the_Environmental_Design_Vocabulary_of_Place_Identity. DOI: 10.12944/CWE.12.3.11
Winterbottom D. Landscape of Home, Landscape of Escape. Landscape Architecture Students Design and Build Gardens in Health Care Settings // Landscape Architecture Magazine. 2009. No 2.
Русский
