Functional-Semantic Approach Existence in Linguistics: Systematic Review
Klyushina Alena Mikhailovna
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Submitted: 22.08.2020
Abstract. This article is a systematic review of the Russian and foreign schools of thought studying semantics and functions of linguistic units that convey a particular meaning. The work aims to provide a detailed historical insight into formation and development of the functional-semantic approach in linguistics. Scientific novelty of the conducted research lies in identifying a number of significant stages in development of the functional-semantic approach in linguistics. The attained results have shown that the functional-semantic approach is a relevant trend in linguistics at the moment; in addition to this, the author substantiates a potential trend in development of the functional-semantic approach, consisting in the necessity to take into account not only linguistic but also extralinguistic factors, which would make the research more complete and comprehensive.
Key words and phrases: функционально-семантический подход, функционально-семантическое поле, полевой подход, разноуровневые языковые единицы, лингвистические научные школы, систематический обзор, functional-semantic approach, functional-semantic field, field approach, linguistic units of different levels, linguistic schools of thought, systematic review
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Admoni V. G. Osnovy teorii grammatiki. M.: Nauka, 1964. 107 s.
Altabaeva E. V. Kategoriya optativnosti v sovremennom russkom yazyke. M.: MGOU, 2002. 230 s.
Babaitseva V. V. Mestoimenie ETO i ego funktsional'nye omonimy: monografiya. Izd-e 3-e, ster. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2016. 165 s.
Balli Sh. Obshchaya lingvistika i voprosy frantsuzskogo yazyka. M.: Izd-vo inostr. lit., 1955. 416 s.
Bukarenko S. G. Otrazhenie fragmentov russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira v predikativnykh stereotipnykh sochetaniyakh: monografiya. M.: MGOU, 2009. 350 s.
Vasil'ev L. M. Semantika russkogo glagola. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1981. 184 s.
Vasil'eva O. A. Strukturirovanie polya zoonimov s arkhisemoi ‘svin'ya’ v russkom diskurse // Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 1 (43). S. 107-112.
Gonnova N. V. Tsar'-proizvodnye v epokhu globalizatsii // Actual Problems of the Humanities: Monograph. Vienna: East West, 2016. Vol. 3. R. 42-53.
Gorodetskii B. Yu., Zevakhina T. S. Polevye metody v semantike i leksikografii: monografiya. M.: MAKS Press, 2015. 228 s.
Gulyga E. V., Shendel's E. I. Grammatiko-leksicheskie polya v sovremennom nemetskom yazyke. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1969. 184 s.
Gurova I. V. Geit-proizvodnye: zaimstvovannye vs. obrazovannye na russkoi pochve // Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal. 2018. T. 7. № 3 (24). S. 29-31.
Ivanyan E. P. Semantika umolchaniya i sredstva ee vyrazheniya v russkom yazyke. Izd-e 2-e, ster. M.: Flinta, 2015. 328 s.
Ivanyan E. P., Kudlinskaya-Stempen' Kh., Nikitina I. N. Mnogoyazychnyi slovar' evfemizmov tualetnoi temy / pod obshch. red. E. P. Ivanyan. M.: Flinta, 2013. 164 s.
Karaulov Yu. N. Obshchaya russkaya ideografiya. M.: Nauka, 1976. 356 s.
Klyushina A. M. Sredstva vyrazheniya passivnosti v angliiskom yazyke v sinkhronii i diakhronii: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Samara, 2013. 23 s.
Lekant P. A. Grammatika kategorii slova i predlozheniya. M.: MGOU, 2007. 213 s.
Mikhailova M. Yu. Semantika nevyrazimogo i sredstva ee peredachi v russkom yazyke: monografiya. Samara: SGSPU, 2017. 243 s.
Senichkina E. P. Semantika umolchaniya i sredstva ee vyrazheniya v russkom yazyke. M.: MGOU, 2002. 307 s.
Ufimtseva A. A. Opyt izucheniya leksiki kak sistemy (na materiale angl. yaz.). Izd-e 2-e, ispr. M.: URSS, 2004. 286 s.
Filin F. P. Ocherki po teorii yazykoznaniya. M.: Nauka, 1982. 336 s.
Shchur G. S. Teorii polya v lingvistike. M.: Nauka, 1974. 254 s.
Fillmore Ch. J. The case for case // Universals in linguistic theory / ed. by E. Bach, R. Harms. N. Y.: Harper and Row, 1968. P. 1-88.
Heyse K. W. L. System der Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin, 1856. 476 S.
Ipsen G. Die alte Orient und die Indogermanen // Stand und Aufgaben der Sprachwissenschaft / Festschrift f?r W. Striberg. Heidelberg, 1924. S. 200-237.
Porzig W. Wesenhafte Bedeutungsbesichungen // Beitrage zur Geschichte der Deutsche Sprache und Literatur. 1934. S. 70-97.
Reuning K. Joy and Freud. A Comparative Study of the Linguistic Field of Pleasurable Emotions in English and German. Swarthmore, 1941. 141 p.
Roget P. M. Roget’s Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. New ed. / prep. by B. Kirkpatrick. Harlow (Essex): Longman, 1987. XLIX+1+1254 r.
Rudskoger A. Fair, foul, nice, proper. A contribution to the study of polysemy. Stockholm, 1952. 505 p.
Trier J. Der deutsche Wortschatz im Sinnbezirk des Verstandes. Die Geschichte eines sprachlichen Feldes. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1931. Bd. 1. Von den Anf?ngen bis zum Beginn des 13. Jahrhunderts. 347 S.
Wierzbicka A. Semantic Primitives / transl. by A. Wierzbicka, J. Besemeres. Frankfurt: Athen?um Verlag, 1972. 235 p.
Русский
