GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2018. № 6. Part 2. P. 230-233.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-6-2.3

RECEPTION OF THE RUSSIAN LITERARY CLASSICS AT THE TURN OF THE XIX-XX CENTURIES: THE PROBLEM STATEMENT
Anisimova Evgeniya Evgen’evna
Siberian Federal University
Submitted: 21.03.2018
Abstract. The article examines the features of literary reception of the classics in the Russian literature at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. As it is shown in the paper, the temporal distance between the classics and modernity in the Russian literature, which is essential in the main European traditions, was compressed and turned into a sharply drawn and acutely problematized line. The act of self-consciousness of new culture was relevant not only to the "long-past" time of great aesthetic achievements, but also to the heritage and reputation of "living" classics, with whom modernists were in the state of intense dialogue.
Key words and phrases: рецепция, русская литература, литературные классики, модернизм, диалог, жизнетворчество, традиция, reception, Russian literature, literary classics, modernism, dialogue, life and creativity, tradition
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Abramovskikh E. V. Kreativnaya retseptsiya nezakonchennykh proizvedenii kak literaturovedcheskaya problema (na materiale dopisyvanii nezakonchennykh otryvkov A. S. Pushkina): diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2007. 453 s.
  2. Akhmatova A. Ya - golos vash… M., 1989. 350 s.
  3. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. 444 s.
  4. Belyi A. Masterstvo Gogolya. M. - L.: Gos. izd-vo khudozhestvennoi literatury, 1934. 324 s.
  5. Blum Kh. Strakh vliyaniya. Karta perechityvaniya. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo un-ta, 1998. 352 s.
  6. Bogomolov N. Drugoi Tolstoi. Pisatel' glazami russkikh simvolistov // Toronto Slavic Quarterly. 2012. T. 40. S. 7-22.
  7. Bunin I. A. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6-ti t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1988. T. 6. 719 s.
  8. Gasparov M. L. Antinomichnost' poetiki russkogo modernizma // Gasparov M. L. Izbrannye trudy: v 2-kh t. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1997. T. 2. O stikhakh. S. 434-455.
  9. Zagidullina M. V. Rannie stat'i Gogolya o Pushkine: k voprosu o "vnutritsekhovoi" retseptsii // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. T. 2. № 1. S. 34-41.
  10. Zorkaya N. Predislovie (Yauss Kh.-R. Istoriya literatury kak provokatsiya literaturovedeniya) // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1995. № 12. S. 34-39.
  11. Levin Yu. I., Segal D. M., Timenchik R. D., Toporov V. N., Tsiv'yan T. V. Russkaya semanticheskaya poetika kak potentsial'naya kul'turnaya paradigma // Russian Literature. 1974. Vol. 3. № 7-8. S. 47-82.
  12. Lotman Yu. M. O russkoi literature klassicheskogo perioda. Vvodnye zamechaniya // Lotman Yu. M. O russkoi literature. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb, 1997. S. 594-604.
  13. Marchenko T. V. Perepisat' klassiku v epokhu modernizma: o poetike i stile rasskaza Bunina "Natali" // Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 2010. T. 69. № 2. S. 25-42.
  14. Merezhkovskii D. S. Avtobiograficheskaya zametka // Merezhkovskii D. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 24-kh t. M.: Tipografiya tovarishchestva I. D. Sytina, 1914. T. 24. S. 105-116.
  15. Nauman M., Shlenshtedt D., Bark K., Klikhe D., Lentser R. Obshchestvo. Literatura. Chtenie. Vospriyatie literatury v teoreticheskom aspekte. M.: Progress, 1978. 292 s.
  16. Opul'skaya L. D. Tolstoi i russkaya literatura kontsa XIX - nachala XX v. // Literaturnoe nasledstvo. M., 1961. T. 69. Kn. 1. S. 103-140.
  17. Perov O. Estetika pozdnego Tolstogo i russkii modernizm // Literatura. (Rusistica Vilnensis). 2001. T. 41-43 (2). S. 137-145.
  18. Solov'ev V. S. Pervyi shag k polozhitel'noi estetike // Solov'ev V. S. Filosofiya iskusstva i literaturnaya kritika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1991. S. 90-98.
  19. Tyupa V. I. Paradigmy khudozhestvennosti (konspekt tsikla lektsii) [Elektronnyi resurs] // Diskurs. 1997. № 3-4. URL: http://old.nsu.ru/education/virtual/discourse34_22.htm (data obrashcheniya: 21.03.2018).
  20. Tyupa V. I. Postsimvolizm: teoreticheskie ocherki russkoi poezii XX veka. Samara, 1998. 115 s.
  21. Khobsbaum E. Izobretenie traditsii // Vestnik Evrazii. 2000. № 1 (8). S. 47-62.
  22. Chekhoviana. Chekhov i "serebryanyi vek": sb. statei / otv. red. A. P. Chudakov. M.: Nauka, 1996. 319 s.
  23. Yauss Kh.-R. Istoriya literatury kak provokatsiya literaturovedeniya // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 1995. № 12. S. 34-84.
  24. Yauss Kh.-R. K probleme dialogicheskogo ponimaniya // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. № 12. S. 97-106.
  25. Paperno I. The Meaning of Art: Symbolist Theories // Creating Life. The Aesthetic Utopia of Russian Modernism / ed. by I. Paperno and J. D. Grossman. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994. P. 13-23.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru