TEXT, STYLE, INDIVIDUAL STYLE IN LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY CRITICISM: COMMENTS TO GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONCEPTS
Ivanov Dmitrii Igorevich, Lakerbai Dmitrii Leonidovich
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, People’s Republic of China; Ivanovo State University
Ivanovo State University
Abstract. The article raises the problem of re-interpreting the adopted terminological word usage in view of the different disciplinary strategies of linguistics and literary criticism. The analysis of the notions "text", "style", "idiolect", "individual style" indicates what cardinally different content can be imposed on these terms and what kind of reduction or aberration it causes. In spite of the active use of the linguistic conception "individual style" the true understanding of individual style uniqueness through linguistic systematicity is impossible due to the very nature of literary text which is "the Other" of the language, not just the literary language. The problem could be solved not by the expansion of a certain disciplinary strategy on the related areas but by the search for new, marginal and "meta-disciplinary" knowledge, re-interpretation of the basics of the traditional disciplines.
Key words and phrases: текст, синтетический текст, идиолект, стиль, идиостиль, text, synthetic text, idiolect, style, individual style
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
Bakhtin M. M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh. Opyt filosofskogo analiza // Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / sost. S. G. Bocharov; tekst podgot. G. S. Bernshtein i L. V. Deryugina; primech. S. S. Averintseva i S. G. Bocharova. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. S. 297-325.
Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenii: v 7-mi t. / red.: S. G. Bocharov, L. A. Gogotishvili. M.: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2002. T. 6. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Raboty 1960-1970 gg. 800 s.
Bibler M. S. Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin, ili Poetika kul'tury (na putyakh k gumanitarnomu razumu). M.: Progress; Gnozis, 1991. 176 s.
Bogdanova E. V. Idiolekt Migelya Delibesa v ego proizvedeniyakh dnevnikovogo zhanra: opyt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya: diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2015. 207 s.
Bychkov V. V. Estetika: uchebnik. M.: KNORUS, 2012. 528 s.
Gavrikov V. A. Russkaya pesennaya poeziya KhKh veka kak tekst. Bryansk: OOO "Bryanskoe SRP VOG", 2011. 634 s.
Gal'perin I. R. Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 1981. 140 s.
Ivanov D. I. Teoriya sinteticheskoi yazykovoi lichnosti: v 2-kh t. / Guandunskii un-t mezhdunar. issledovanii (Kitai). Ivanovo: PresSto, 2017. T. 1. 360 s.
Ivanov D. I., Lakerbai D. L. Teoriya sinteticheskoi yazykovoi lichnosti: novye gorizonty // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 12 (66): v 4-kh ch. Ch. 1. C. 92-95.
Kasevich V. B. Semantika. Sintaksis. Morfologiya. M.: Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury izdatel'stva "Nauka", 1988. 309 s.
Klovak E. V. Tipichnye avtorskie modeli kak realizatsiya universal'nogo i individual'nogo v idiostile: diss. … k. filol. n. Tver', 2015. 155 s.
Lakerbai D. L. Stil' kak metodologicheskaya problema literaturovedeniya // Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya "Gumanitarnye nauki". 2013. Vyp. 1 (13). S. 25-46.
Losev A. F. Problema khudozhestvennogo stilya. Kiev: Collegium; Kievskaya akademiya evrobiznesa, 1994. 288 s.
Matveeva T. V. Polnyi slovar' lingvisticheskikh terminov. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2010. 562 s.