GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2017. № 2. Part 1. P. 88-91.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

ON SUBSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN COMPLEX ANAPHORA
Danilova Elena Romanovna
Kuban State University, Krasnodar
Abstract. The article analyzes the types of substitutional transformation in complex anaphora. The analysis indicates the absence of special type of substitutional transformation in complex anaphors compressing its antecedent content as the process of speaking. The author justifies the necessity to focus on speech act structure as a source of substitutional transformation at the meta-level of complex-anaphoric reference and on addressee plane as a factor of statement’s communicative-pragmatic component explication. The paper proposes the classification of substitutional transformation types in complex anaphors with antecedent-statement in the form of direct or indirect speech.
Key words and phrases: комплексная анафора, тип заместительного преобразования, локутивный акт, иллокутивный акт, адресатный план, complex anaphora, type of substitutional transformation, locutive act, illocutive act, addressee plane
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Arutyunova N. D. Predlozhenie i proizvodnye ot nego znacheniya // Yazyk i mir cheloveka. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1999. S. 403-538.
  2. Voronkova A. V. Strategii kognitivnoi obrabotki diskursivnoi anafory propozitivno-imennogo tipa: diss. … k. filol. n. Orel, 2003. 276 s.
  3. Kobozeva I. M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika. M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. 352 s.
  4. Krongauz M. A. Semantika: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: RGGU, 2001. 299 s.
  5. Oleinik M. A. Adresat i dinamicheskaya yazykovaya kartina mira: kontseptsiya vzaimoobuslovlennosti: diss. … d. filol. n. Rostov n/D, 2006. 345 s.
  6. Ostin Dzh. Slovo kak deistvie // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. M.: Progress, 1986. Vyp. 17. Teoriya rechevykh aktov. C. 22-131.
  7. Radzievskaya T. V. Anaforicheskie imena s antetsedentom-vyskazyvaniem // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya literatury i yazyka. 1979. T. 38. № 2. S. 128-135.
  8. Fedotova O. S. Ponyatie metadiskursa v sovremennoi lingvistike // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. Tambov: Gramota, 2012. № 6. S. 203-207.
  9. Bu?mann H. Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Alfred Kr?ner Verlag, 2008. 816 S.
  10. Consten M. Anaphorisch oder deiktisch? Zu einem integrativen Modell dom?nengebundener Referenz. T?bingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 2004. 169 S.
  11. DUDEN. Deutsches Universalw?rterbuch. 5., ?berarbeitete Auflage / Dudenredaktion. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2003. 1892 S.
  12. Marx K. Die Verarbeitung von Komplexanaphern. Neurolinguistische Untersuchungen zur kognitiven Textverstehenstheorie. Berlin: Universit?tsverlag der TU, 2011. 284 S.
  13. Moser A. B., Bischoff F. Bauern mit der Zauberformel // COMPACT. Magazin f?r Souver?nit?t. Werder (Havel): Compact-Magazin GmbH, 2014. № 10. S. 46-47.
  14. Searle J. R. Sprechakte: ein sprachphilosophischer Essay. Sinzheim: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft. 1983. 306 S.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru