PHENOMENON OF STYLISTIC PARADOX IN MODERN LINGUISTICS
Kurbaitaeva Aida Anvarovna
Moscow City Teachers’ Training University
Abstract. The article considers the content of the notion "paradox", which is a very controversial and little studied issue in linguistics, and thus attracts the attention of linguists. Such studies were carried out on the basis of the English and Russian languages, but the phenomenon of paradox has been little and incompletely studied in German. The author gives a definition of this notion from the perspective of different disciplines and focuses on describing the functions of the paradox as a stylistic phenomenon, characterizes its classifications on various features, and notes the main groups - the breaking of style, form and content discrepancy and parody means.
Key words and phrases: парадокс, функция, классификация, группа, форма, содержание, пародирующие средства, paradox, function, classification, group, form, content, parody means
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Ataeva E. A. Lingvisticheskaya priroda i stilisticheskie funktsii oksyumorona: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 1975. 29 s.
Bol'shoi entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1981. 1456 s.
Brandes M. P. Stilistika nemetskogo yazyka. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1983. 271 s.
Gal'perin I. R. Ocherki po stilistike angliiskogo yazyka. M.: Izd-vo lit. na in. yazykakh, 1958. 459 s.
Gor'kii A. M. Sobranie sochinenii. M.: Goslitizdat, 1955. T. 29. 671 s.
Devkin V. D. Paradoksy v nemetskom yazyke // Inostrannye yazyki v shkole. 1988. № 2. S. 15-21.
Denisova O. K. K voprosu ob ispol'zovanii nekotorykh stilisticheskikh sredstv v p'esakh Oskara Uail'da // Voprosy leksikologii i stilistiki romano-germanskikh yazykov. Irkutsk: Izd-vo IPIIYa, 1972. Vyp. 1. S. 73-85.
Odintsov V. V. Lingvisticheskie paradoksy: kn. dlya uchashchikhsya st. klassov. Izd-e 2-e. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1982. 175 s.
Semen G. Ya. Lingvisticheskaya priroda i funktsionirovanie stilisticheskogo priema paradoksa (na materiale angl. yaz.): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Odessa, 1986. 16 s.
Taneev B. T. Paradoks: paradoksal'nye vyskazyvaniya: monografiya. Ufa: Izd-vo BGPU, 2001. 400 s.
Shpektorova N. Yu. K voprosu o literaturno-khudozhestvennom paradokse (na materiale proizvedenii O. Uail'da) // Voprosy leksikologii, leksikografii i stilistiki romano-germanskikh yazykov: sb. nauch. trudov. Samarkand: Samarkand. gos. un-t, 1975. S. 218-225.
Bloch W. Das reine Amtsdeutsch. Berlin: R. Oefler, 1922. 280 S.
Mann H. Der Untertan. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag GmbH, 1995. 896 S.
Naer N. M. Stilistik der deutschen Sprache. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2006. 272 S.
Pagliaro H. G. Paradox in the Aphorisms of La Rochefoucault and Some Representative English Followers // PMLA. N. Y., 1964. № 79. P. 42-50.
Riesel E. Abriss der Deutschen Stilistik. M.: Verlag fur fremdsprachige Literatur, 1954. 402 S.
Zoozmann R. Die sch?nsten Liebesgedichte und Schelmenst?cke aus drei Jahrtausenden. Eltville: Bechterm?nz Verlag, 1989. 424 S.
Русский
