Expanding Predictive Function of Educational Comparative Studies in the Context of Globalisation
Benin Vladislav Lvovich, Pleshakova Anastasia Yurievna
Bashkir State Pedagogical University named after M. Akmulla
Ural State Mining University
Submitted: 04.02.2021
Abstract. The purpose of the study is to structure the theory and to create a tool for conducting comparative studies in the field of vocational education with a focus on the predictive function. In the article, the authors analyse approaches to understanding prediction in the field of education developed by the Russian and foreign researchers, which are designated as a methodological framework of the study. Scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that it presents a concept of the structured theory of comparative vocational education with emphasis on the predictive function and a tool for conducting comparative studies which are focused on educational transfer prediction. As a result, current development of comparative education is characterised, a concept of the structured theory of comparative vocational education and a scientifically grounded tool for a comparative analysis with the predictive function are presented.
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Preadaptatsiya k neopredelennosti: nepredskazuemye marshruty evolyutsii. M.: Akropol', 2018. 212 s.
Gershunskii B. S. Obrazovatel'no-pedagogicheskaya prognostika: teoriya; metodologiya; praktika: ucheb. posobie. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2003. 764 s.
Kasavin I. T. Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst. Vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu epistemologiyu yazyka. M.: Kanon+, 2008. 437 s.
Kordonskii S. G. Veernye matritsy kak instrument postroeniya ontologii. Vashington: Yugo-Vostok, 2011. 66 s.
Mir VUCA i podkhody vyzhivaniya v nem [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://becmology.ru/blog/management/vuca.htm (data obrashcheniya: 21.06.2020).
Novikov A. M. Doktorskaya dissertatsiya?: posobie dlya doktorantov i soiskatelei uchenoi stepeni doktora nauk. Izd-e 3-e. M.: Egves, 2003. 120 s.
Skatkin M. N. Metodologiya i metodika pedagogicheskikh issledovanii. V pomoshch' nachinayushchemu issledovatelyu. M.: Pedagogika, 1986. 152 s.
Tagunova I. A. Pedagogicheskaya komparativistika v kontekste ponyatii i podkhodov sovremennoi nauki // Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2017. T. 1. № 4 (41). S. 41-53.
Tagunova I. A. Pedagogicheskaya komparativistika vchera, segodnya, zavtra // Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2011. № 1. C. 132-146.
Khabermas Yu. Teoriya kommunikativnogo deistviya (fragmenty) // Voprosy sotsial'noi teorii. 2007. T. I. Vyp. 1. S. 229-245.
Espan' M. O ponyatii kul'turnogo transfera. Predislovie // Evropeiskii kontekst russkogo formalizma (k probleme esteticheskikh peresechenii: Frantsiya, Germaniya, Italiya, Rossiya) / pod red. E. Dmitrievoi, V. Zemskova, M. Espanya. M.: IMLI RAN. 2009. S. 7-18.
CEDEFOP (European Center for the Development of Vocational Education and Training) [Elektronnyi resurs]: Official web-page. URL: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.05.2020).
Cowen R. Acting comparatively upon the educational world: Puzzles and possibilities // Oxford Review of Education. 2006. Vol. 32. № 5. P. 561-573.
Crossley M. Bridging Cultures and Traditions in the Reconceptualisation of Comparative and International Education // Comparative Education. 2000. Vol. 36. № 3. P. 319-332.
Holmes B. The problem approach in comparative education: Some methodological considerations // Comparative Education Review. 1958. Vol. 2. P. 3-8.
Mobilis in mobili: lichnost' v epokhu peremen: mezhdistsiplinarnyi proekt: sb. st. / pod obshch. red. A. G. Asmolova. M.: YaSK, 2018. 547 s.
Rosello P. Comparative education as an instrument of planning // Comparative Education Review. 1960. Vol. 4. P. 3-12.
Steiner-Khamsi G. Comparison and Context: The Interdisciplinary Approach to the Comparative Study of Education // Current Issues in Comparative Education. 2014. № 16 (2). P. 34-42.
Русский
