Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2016. № 4. Part 1. P. 43-46.
FATALISM AND PERMISSIVENESS. oPPOSITION OF FATALISM AND FREEDOM
Gadzhikurbanov Aslan Gusaevich
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract. The classical tradition in ethics postulates the alternativeness of moral choice. In this sense moral freedom turns to be principally inconsistent with the traditional idea of fatalism. At the same time the experience of the history of moral doctrines, in particular ethics by Spinoza, shows that predetermination and freedom don’t exclude each other at all. Moreover the most rigid version of fatalism results in an unexpected consequence - the principal permissiveness while fulfilling moral deeds.
Key words and phrases: Спиноза, возможность выбора, моральная свобода, фатализм, произвольное действие, предопределенность, вседозволенность, естественное право, стоический детерминизм, Spinoza, possibility of choice, moral freedom, fatalism, arbitrary action, predetermination, permissiveness, natural law, stoic determinism
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aristotel'. Sochineniya: v 4-kh t. M., 1984. T. 4. Mysl'. 831 s.
Spinoza B. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. Izd-e 2-e. SPb.: Nauka, 1999. T. 1. 489 s.
Stolyarov A. A. Stoya i stoitsizm. M.: AO KAMI GRUP, 1995. 442 s.
Bobzien S. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD, 1998. 441 p.
Brennan T. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties and Fate. Oxford, 2005. 327 p.
Forschner M. Die Stoische Ethik: ueber den Zusammenhang von Natur- Sprach- und Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System. Stuttgart, 1981. 327 S.
Marcus Aurelius. Ad se ipsum / ed. J. Dalfen. Leipzig, 1979. 177 p.
Matheron A. Individu et commonaute chez Spinoza. P.: Minuit, 1988. 681 r.
Rist J. M. Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge, 1969. 256 r.
Tsekourakis D. Studies in the Terminology of Early Stoic Ethics. Wiesbaden, 1974. 139 p.
Русский
