Psychologism in the novellas by D. H. Lawrence and Tennessee Williams: A comparative aspect
Nikolaeva Marina Nikolaevna, Fedorenko Olga Yaroslavovna
Moscow City University
Submitted: 27.12.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to identify common and specific features in the interpretation and depiction of psychologism in the novellas by the English-speaking writers of the 20th century David Herbert Lawrence (1885-1930) and Tennessee Williams (1911-1983). Some Western theorists in their research note the influence of D. H. Lawrence on Tennessee Williams, observed, in particular, in a similar choice of themes in their works. Tennessee Williams recognized the importance of his British colleague’s creative method for his own writings. Nevertheless, the rich heritage of the writers in question represents an inexhaustible source for advancing new scientific goals and finding previously unexplored facets for research. The scientific originality of the study lies in establishing the fact of significant similarity in the use of the literary techniques for creating psychologism in the novellas by D. H. Lawrence and Tennessee Williams. As a result of a detailed literary analysis of the novellas, similar literary techniques of actualization of the psychological aspect were found. These techniques include the developed level of imagery in the short prose by the writers under comparison (images-characters, images-symbols), a peculiar depiction of literary time (retrospection), descriptive techniques, etc.
Key words and phrases: психологизм, новелла, внутренний мир человека, художественные приемы и выразительные средства, символизм образов, прием несобственно-прямой речи, ретроспекция, антитеза, аллюзия, psychologism, novella, inner world of a person, literary techniques and expressive means, symbolism of images, represented speech technique, retrospection, antithesis, allusion
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Baranova K. M., Afanas'eva O. V. Motiv «odinochestvo» v romane Dzh. Grina «Bumazhnye goroda» // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2023. № 1 (49).
Bedrikova M. L., Kalimullina E. V. Psikhologizm prozy A. Remizova i K. Fedina 1910-1920-kh godov: problema traditsii // Yazyk. Kul'tura. Perevod: mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya v tsifrovuyu epokhu: sb. nauch. trudov: v 2-kh ch. M., 2022. Ch. 2.
Bulashova N. M. Poetika rasskazov D. G. Lourensa: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2013.
Ginzburg L. Ya. O psikhologicheskoi proze. L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1977.
Esin A. B. Printsipy i priemy analiza literaturnogo proizvedeniya. M.: Flinta, 2008.
Esin A. B. Psikhologizm russkoi klassicheskoi literatury: ucheb. posobie. Izd-e 5-e, ster. M.: Flinta, 2022.
Kompaneets V. V. Khudozhestvennyi psikhologizm kak problema issledovaniya // Russkaya literatura. 1974. № 1.
Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatii / gl. red. A. N. Nikolyukin. M., 2001.
Mikolaichik M. V. Khudozhestvennyi psikhologizm i ego mesto v sisteme literaturovedcheskikh terminov i ponyatii // Voprosy russkoi literatury. 2014. № 29 (86).
Michugina S. V. Transdistsiplinarnyi podkhod k izucheniyu terminov tsveta na primere angliiskogo red // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2023. № 1 (49).
Nefedova O. I., Fedorenko O. Ya. Motiv «voobrazhaemoe» v romane D. Brauna «Kod da Vinchi» // Yazyk i literatura v problematike sovremennykh gumanitarnykh nauk: sb. nauch. trudov po lingvistike i literaturovedeniyu. M.: PRINTIKA, 2021.
Nikolaeva M. N. «Tsvetovaya palitra» kak sostavlyayushchii komponent obraznosti v proizvedeniyakh D. G. Lourensa // Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya: mat. IV mezhvuz. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 25-26 aprelya 2007 g.) / nauch. red. S. R. Abramov. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskii gumanitarnyi universitet profsoyuzov, 2007.
Nikolaeva M. N. Verbalizatsiya emotsional'no-chuvstvennykh proyavlenii v khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniyakh D. G. Lourensa // Voprosy filologii i mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii: sb. nauch. statei / otv. red. N. V. Kormilina, N. Yu. Shugaeva. Cheboksary: ChGPU, 2017.
Strakhov I. V. Psikhologicheskii analiz v literaturnom tvorchestve: v 5-ti ch. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. gos. ped. in-ta, 1973. Ch. 1.
Fedorenko O. Ya. Priem retrospektsii v drame A. Millera «Ya nichego ne pomnyu» // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2021. № 1 (41).
Fedorenko O. Ya. Spetsifika formy realizatsii arkhetipa «rai» v p'ese T. Uil'yamsa «Steklyannyi zverinets» // Traditsii i innovatsii v lingvistike i literaturovedenii: mezhkaf. sb. nauch. statei / nauch. red. K. M. Baranova, O. G. Chupryna. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta, 2018.
Brown B. Out of Touch: A Study of the Literary Relationship between the Work of D. H. Lawrence and Tennessee Williams: A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts. Hamilton: McMaster University, 1983.
Fedder N. J. The Influence of D. H. Lawrence on Tennessee Williams. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.
Feinstein E. Introduction. Lawrence’s Women. L.: Harper Collins Publisher, 1993.
Fleming F. Lawrence’s Female Travellers // Études Lawrenciennes. 2019. No. 49.
Maddox B. D. H. Lawrence: The Story of a Marriage. N. Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1994.
Millet K. Sexual Politics. N. Y.: Doubleday, 1970.
Ragachewskaya M. S. “The Man Who Loved Islands” and “The Woman Who Rode Away”: Turning a Moment into Eternity // Études Lawrenciennes. 2017. No. 48.
Schvey H. I. After the Fox: The Influence of D. H. Lawrence on Tennessee Williams // The Tennessee Williams Annual Review. 2018. No. 17. https://doi.org/10.2307/48615446
Русский
