GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2024. № 2. P. 354-362.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240049

Dedication as a way of ontologization of the heterogeneity of modern English-language scientific discourse

Efimova Nadezhda Nikolayevna, Violina Marina Igorevna
Irkutsk Scientific Center

Irkutsk State University


Submitted: 29.11.2023
Abstract. The aim of the research is to identify the role of dedications in English scientific prose in ontologizing its heterogeneity. One of the paratext elements of modern scientific publications in English, i.e., dedication, was used as the language material. The scientific novelty of the research is as follows: for the first time, dedication has been investigated as a type of paratext in English-language academic discourse and the dedication examples representing personal discourse and acting as paratext elements in institutional discourse have been selected. The influence of dedication functions and characteristics on the ontologization of academic text heterogeneity has been empirically confirmed; the chosen methodology has been used for the first time to analyze authentic examples, which were not previously described from the perspective of the problem under study. The paper summarizes the key characteristics of scientific discourse that are important for identifying the correlation between the ways of heterogeneity manifestation and the structural element in which it is actualized. The research findings demonstrated the following facts: general classifications of dedications without differentiation by the text type are applicable to dedications of scientific texts, the latter contribute to the ontologization of the heterogeneity of scientific texts. In addition, the heterogeneity of scientific texts was shown to be reflected in the range of types of dedications and the variety of their functions, manifested to varying degrees depending on the type of the text itself, the type of dedication and the author’s intention.
Key words and phrases: научный дискурс, гетерогенность, посвящение, паратекст, экспрессивность, scientific discourse, heterogeneity, dedication, paratext, expressiveness
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Van'ko T. R. K voprosu ob ekspressivnosti nauchnogo diskursa // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2014. № 25 (711).
  2. Vakhterova E. V. Issledovanie akademicheskogo diskursa v otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi lingvistike // Globus. 2021. T. 7. № 1 (58).
  3. Vakhterova E. V., Boriskina O. O., Stebletsova A. O. Issledovatel'skii diskurs: zhanrovye universalii i distsiplinarnaya spetsifika nauchnykh statei // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya. 2020. № 3.
  4. Golovanova E. I. Lichnostnoe nachalo v sovremennom nauchnom diskurse (na primere teksta posvyashcheniya k knige) // Uchenye zapiski Zabaikal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya, istoriya, vostokovedenie. 2011. № 2 (37).
  5. Kochetkova N. D. Literaturnye posvyashcheniya v russkikh izdaniyakh XVIII – nachala XIX veka // XVIII vek. 2002. T. 22.
  6. Kuz'min D. V. K funktsional'noi tipologii posvyashchenii // Toronto Slavic Quarterly. 2013. № 45.
  7. Linnik L. A. Nauchnyi diskurs i ego lingvisticheskie osobennosti // Sovremennye problemy nauki, tekhnologii, innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti: sb. nauch. trudov po mat. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii: v 4-kh ch. Belgorod: Agentstvo perspektivnykh nauchnykh issledovanii, 2017. Ch. III.
  8. Likhachev D. S. Razvitie russkoi literatury X-XVII vekov. Epokhi i stili. L.: Nauka, 1973.
  9. Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa. M.: Gnozis, 2003.
  10. Melamedova E. A. Otrazhenie yazykovoi lichnosti avtora v nauchnoi gumanitarnoi literature: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Samara, 2009.
  11. Milovanova N. Ya. Ekspressivnost' v stile nauchnoi prozy: diss. … k. filol. n. Perm', 1982.
  12. Pokalyukhina M. A. Paratekstovye elementy v angloyazychnoi nauchno-populyarnoi literature: lingvopragmaticheskii aspekt: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Samara, 2014.
  13. Khazagerov G. G. V chem smysl individualizatsii nauchnogo diskursa? // Mir lingvistiki i kommunikatsii. 2021. № 65.
  14. Farasse G. Bref traité des envois illustré d’exemples choisis chez les bons auteurs // Envois & Dédicaces / éd. par G. Farasse. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.septentrion.80091
  15. Leroy C. Écrire à la cantonade.Comment ricochent les dédicaces // Envois & Dédicaces / éd. par G. Farasse. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.septentrion.80096
  16. Raynaud J.-M. La dédicace subvertie // Envois & Dédicaces / éd. par G. Farasse. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.septentrion.80136
  17. Vermij R. On the Function of Dedications in Early Modern Scientific Books // Nuncius. 2018. Vol. 33 (2).

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru