Linguistic objectification of the critical format of English-language scientific discourse
Mironova Marina Yurievna
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Submitted: 15.08.2023
Abstract. The study aims to identify ways of objectifying the critical format of English-language scientific discourse. It is shown that the critical attitude to the results of scientific research is conveyed by linguistic constructions with the semantics of doubt, disagreement and refutation, lexical units associated with a negative characteristic in the linguistic axiological paradigm, as well as by neutral evaluative linguistic units that acquire evaluative content under the influence of context. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying the critical format of scientific discourse, describing the specifics of its linguistic actualization. The possibility of highlighting this format of scientific discourse has not been considered previously. As a result, the validity of identifying the critical format of scientific discourse is proved and the main means of its objectification are determined. The means of objectification of the critical attitude of the discourse subject to scientific knowledge are shown. It is found that the choice of verbalization means is determined by the value orientations of the discourse of the genre in question, namely, the possession of novelty and scientific significance, the pursuit of truth, and the verifiability of data.
Key words and phrases: научный дискурс, критический формат, языковая объективация, ценности, scientific discourse, critical format, linguistic objectification, values
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenii. Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. M.: Nauka, 1988.
Bazhenova E. A. Aksiologicheskoe prostranstvo nauchnogo teksta // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii: tez. dokl. mezhdunar. nauch. konferentsii / Ural'skii gumanitarnyi institut. Ekaterinburg, 2019.
Baranov A. N. Aksiologicheskie strategii v strukture yazyka (paremiologiya i leksika) // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1989. № 3.
Belyakov M. V. Lingvoaksiologiya i lingvosemiotika diplomaticheskogo diskursa (na materiale otkrytoi professional'noi diplomatii): diss. … d. filol. n. M., 2022.
Burmakina N. G. Diskursivno-integrativnye i kul'turno-konventsional'nye kharakteristiki akademicheskoi kommunikatsii: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2014.
Vargina E. I. Nauchnyi tekst: funktsiya vozdeistviya: diss. … d. filol. n. SPb., 2004.
Vendina T. I. Semantika otsenki i ee manifestatsiya sredstvami slovoobrazovaniya // Slavyanovedenie. 1997. № 4.
Vol'f E. M. Funktsional'naya semantika otsenki. Izd-e 2-e, dop. M.: Editorial URSS, 2002.
Gaiduk L. D. Zhanr retsenzii v sfere voenno-nauchnoi kommunikatsii (kognitivno-diskursivnyi aspekt): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Mn., 2008.
Danilevskaya N. V. Nauchnyi tekst kak dinamika otsenochnykh deistvii // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. 2009. Vyp. 2.
Danilevskaya N. V. Cheredovanie starogo i novogo znaniya kak mekhanizm razvertyvaniya nauchnogo teksta (aksiologicheskii aspekt): diss. … d. filol. n. Ekaterinburg, 2006.
Karasik V. I. Tsennosti kak kul'turno znachimye orientiry povedeniya // Gumanitarnye tekhnologii v sovremennom mire: sb. mat. VII mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konferentsii. Kaliningrad, 2019.
Kochetova L. A. Dinamika aksiologicheskikh kharakteristik reklamnogo diskursa // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2013. № 2 (69).
Kuz'menko P. B. Strukturno-soderzhatel'naya organizatsiya gumanitarnogo nauchnogo teksta na angliiskom yazyke: na materiale publikatsii po lingvistike: diss. … k. filol. n. Voronezh, 2020.
Markelova T. V. Semantika otsenki i sredstva ee vyrazheniya v russkom yazyke: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. M., 1996.
Mar'yanchik V. A. Aksiologicheskaya struktura media-politicheskogo teksta (lingvostilisticheskii aspekt): avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. Arkhangel'sk, 2013.
Maryukhin A. P. Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya v nauchnom diskurse (na materiale russkogo, angliiskogo, nemetskogo yazykov): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2010.
Maslova L. N. Vyrazhenie soglasiya/nesoglasiya v ustnoi nauchnoi kommunikatsii: gendernyi aspekt: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. M., 2007.
Mironova N. N. Struktura otsenochnogo diskursa: diss. … d. filol. n. M., 1998.
Naumenko Yu. N. Markery nauchnykh kategorii issledovaniya: sopostavitel'nyi analiz sposobov verbalizatsii: diss. … k. filol. n. Tver', 2021.
Panchenko N. N. Dostovernost' kak kommunikativnaya kategoriya: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. Volgograd, 2010.
Prikhod'ko A. I. Kognitivno-diskursivnyi potentsial otsenki i sposoby ego vyrazheniya v sovremennom angliiskom yazyke: avtoref. diss. … d. filol. n. Zaporozh'e, 2004.
Radbil' T. B. «Yazyk tsennostei» v sovremennoi russkoi rechi i puti ego ischisleniya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2011. № 6-2.
Starostina Yu. S., Khar'kovskaya A. A. Dinamika negativnoi otsenki v angloyazychnom dramaturgicheskom diskurse: monografiya. Praga: Sociosféra-CZ, 2014.
Troyanskaya E. S. Lingvostilisticheskoe issledovanie nemetskoi nauchnoi literatury. M.: Nauka, 1985.
Khomutova T. N. Strategii nauchnogo diskursa: integral'nyi podkhod // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2015. T. 12. № 3.
Chernyavskaya V. E. Nauchnyi diskurs: vydvizhenie rezul'tata kak kommunikativnaya i yazykovaya problema. M.: LENAND, 2017.
Shamara I. F. Nauchnaya meditsinskaya stat'ya: evolyutsiya zhanra (na materiale statei iz zhurnalov SShA): avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. SPb., 1993.
Khamkhien A. Linguistic features of evaluative stance: Findings from research article discussions // Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2014. Vol. 4. No. 1.
Rescher N.Introduction to value theory. Englewood Cliffs, 1982.
Wright G. H. von. The varieties of goodness. N. Y. – L., 1963.
Русский
