GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Philology. Theory & Practice. Tambov: Gramota, 2023. № 6. P. 1862-1868.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philological Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20230287

Manipulative concepts and their representation in Joe Biden’s official speeches in 2022-2023

Vlavatskaya Marina Vitalyevna, Porechnaya Olga Georgievna
Novosibirsk State Technical University


Submitted: 29.04.2023
Abstract. The aim of the study is to identify the manipulative concepts represented by certain linguistic means in Joe Biden’s official speeches and the special mechanisms of influence on the consciousness of the potential US electorate. The scientific novelty of the study lies in determining the concepts objectified in the public speech of the American president in 2022-2023 and in identifying the strategies, tactics and techniques of speech manipulation present in his speech. As a result, it has been found that the manipulative concepts in Joe Biden’s official speeches are represented by the lexemes ‘(Russia’s) Invasion’, ‘Covid’ and ‘Employment’ with the use of the speech strategies of downplay and intensification based on images, sign systems, and life values. Among the manipulation tactics used by the president there are, first, the tactics based on human feelings and needs (physiological needs, life values, the need for security, etc.) and, second, the tactics of manipulative presentation of information (distortion of statistical information; exploitation of digital data, etc.). Most often Joe Biden uses the technique of narrative intimization (the pronouns ‘we’ and ‘our’), which creates the impression of having trustful communication with the audience and the illusion of joint decision-making; sometimes he uses epithets and metaphors, which also possess a great manipulative effect.
Key words and phrases: политический дискурс, речевое манипулирование, стратегии, тактики и приемы манипуляции, лексико-грамматические и синтаксические средства выражения, political discourse, speech manipulation, strategies, manipulation tactics and techniques, lexico-grammatical and syntactic expressive means
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Balakhonskaya L. V., Sergeeva E. V. Lingvistika rechevogo vozdeistviya i manipulirovaniya. Izd-e 5-e, ster. M.: FLINTA, 2020.
  2. Bykova O. N. Yazykovoe manipulirovanie // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty rechevogo obshcheniya: nauch.-metod. byulleten'. Krasnoyarsk – Achinsk: Ofset, 1999. Vyp. 1 (8).
  3. Gornostaeva A. A. Osobennosti zapadnoi i rossiiskoi politicheskoi kommunikatsii i ikh otrazhenie v diskurse // Aktual'nye problemy lingvistiki, perevodovedeniya i pedagogiki. 2017. № 1.
  4. Danilova A. A. Manipulirovanie slovom v sredstvakh massovoi informatsii. M., 2011.
  5. Dimante I. V. Instrumentarii professional'nogo kommunikatora (priemy rechevogo vozdeistviya) // Kommunikativnye issledovaniya. 2015. № 4 (6).
  6. Zhuravleva O. A., Pivovarova M. O. Instrumenty i tekhnologii vozdeistviya na chitatelya (na materiale britanskikh gazet) // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2019. T. 12. Vyp. 4.
  7. Il'icheva Yu. A. Rechevoe manipulirovanie v politicheskom tekste // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 9 «Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. Zhurnalistika». 2013. № 4.
  8. Komarova Z. I. Lingvopolitologiya kak chastnaya paradigma sovremennoi lingvistiki: metodologicheskii aspekt // Politicheskaya lingvistika. 2012. № 4.
  9. Kopnina G. A. Rechevaya manipulyatsiya v massmediinom tekste/diskurse: problema raspoznavaniya // Filologiya i chelovek. 2021. № 3.
  10. Kopnina G. A. Rechevoe manipulirovanie. M.: Flinta, 2010.
  11. Mikhaleva O. L. Politicheskii diskurs: spetsifika manipulyativnogo vozdeistviya. M.: LIBROKOM, 2009.
  12. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. Interpretatsionnoe pole natsional'nogo kontsepta i metody ego izucheniya // Kul'tura obshcheniya i ee formirovanie: sb. tr. konf. Voronezh: Poligraf, 2001. Vyp. 8.
  13. Chernyavskaya V. E., Molodychenko E. N. Rechevoe vozdeistvie v politicheskom, reklamnom i internet-diskurse. M., 2017.
  14. Shagbanova Kh. S. Yazykovye sredstva rechevogo manipulirovaniya // Teorii i problemy politicheskikh issledovanii. 2020. T. 9. № 5.
  15. Anderson S., Saussure L. de. René de Saussure and the Theory of Word Formation. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2018.
  16. Connell L. What Have Labels Ever Done for Us? The Linguistic Shortcut in Conceptual Processing // Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2019. Vol. 34. Iss. 10.
  17. Dijk T. A. van. News as Discourse. 1st ed. N. Y.: Routledge, 1988.
  18. Fairclough N., Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis // Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction / ed. by T. van Dijk. L.: Sage, 1997.
  19. Weiss G., Wodak R. Theory, Interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 2003.

Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru