GRAMOTA Publishers suggests publishing your scientific articles in periodicals
Pan-ArtPedagogy. Theory & PracticePhilology. Theory & PracticeManuscript

Archive of Scientific Articles

SOURCE:    Manuscript. Tambov: Gramota, 2021. № 5. P. 884-890.
SCIENTIFIC AREA:    Philosophical Sciences
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

License Agreement on scientific materials use.

https://doi.org/10.30853/mns210183

R. Ingarden’s Phenomenological Philosophy of Literature. Status of Aesthetic Objects and Their Relation to Reality
Mikhilovskii Mikhail Olegovich
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M. V. Lomonosov
Submitted: 16.04.2021
Abstract. The study aims to find out what the basis of any literary work is and what role the reader plays in formation of the image of this type of art in the process of its perception. R. Ingarden’s understanding of the literary work is that of a purely intentional object, so there emerges the issue of its status as this type of object, since it is necessary to explain what the literary work is in the isolated state. However, the reader, being a perceiving link, causes noticeable fluctuations in the literary work and adds that which is absent from the basis that R. Ingarden seeks to form. The article describes a way to solve this problem. Scientific novelty of the study lies in conducting a detailed analysis of the layers of the literary work involving achievements of the phenomenological method and in describing the reader’s influence on the above-mentioned layers. As a result, it is proved that the literary work has an objective basis in the form of layers that characterise the structure of the work and that literature is redundant in nature, which is demonstrated by introduction of the notion of concretisation describing formation of the meaning of the literary work by the reader.
Key words and phrases: структура литературного произведения, слои литературного произведения, интенциональные объекты, восприятие литературного произведения, конкретизация, structure of literary work, layers of literary work, intentional objects, perception of literary work, concretisation
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded here.
References:
  1. Bychkov V. V., Man'kovskaya N. B. Fenomenologo-retseptivnye aspekty esteticheskogo opyta // Vestnik slavyanskikh kul'tur. 2015. № 2 (36). S. 179-194.
  2. Vikent'eva S. A. Praktika chteniya kak opyt vovlechennosti // Obshchestvo: istoriya, filosofiya, kul'tura. 2018. № 2 (48). S. 1-4.
  3. Volodina N. V., Kalinina E. V. Literaturnyi kritik (I. B. Rodnyanskaya) o literaturovedenii i literaturovedakh // Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2016. № 4. S. 65-70.
  4. Ingarden R. Issledovaniya po estetike / per. s pol'sk. A. Ermilova i B. Fedorova. M.: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury, 1962. 572 s.
  5. Novikova Yu. V. Interpretatsiya khudozhestvennogo teksta i obuchenie perevodu khudozhestvennoi literatury // Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2011. № 7 (29). S. 259-262.
  6. Solodilova I. A. Smysl v svete germenevticheskikh uchenii // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2003. № 4. S. 65-69.
  7. Timoshchuk E. A. Fenomenologiya literatury Romana Ingardena // Filologicheskie zametki. 2019. № 17. S. 1-20.
  8. Coignard A. Imagination et lecture selon Ingarden: La d?licatesse de l’imagination // Bulletin d'analyse ph?nom?nologique. 2017. Vol. 2. Iss. 17. P. 288-320.
  9. Delle Site N. The Aesthetic Theory of Ingarden and Its Philosophical Implications // Analecta Husserliana. Ingardeniana II. New Studies in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden. 1990. Iss. 30. P. 71-84.
  10. Flajoliet A. Esquisse d'une ph?nom?nologie de l'?uvre litt?raire // Sens Public. 2008. Iss. 1. R. 1-41.
  11. Ingarden R. Das literarische Kunstwerk. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1931. 389 S.
  12. Ingarden R. L'?uvre d'art litt?raire / trad. fr. P. Secretan. Lausanne: L'?ge d'homme, 1983. 341 r.
  13. Ingarden R. The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. 436 r.
  14. Ingarden R. The Literary Work of Art / transl. by George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973. 415 r.
  15. Ingarden R. Untersuchungen zur Ontologie der Kunst. T?bingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1962. 352 S.
  16. Ingarden R. Vom Erkennen des literarischen Kunstwerks. T?bingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1968. 440 S.
  17. Jin-Yang Z. The New Criticism and Ingarden’s Phenomenological Theory of Literature // Analecta Husserliana. Ingardeniana II. New Studies in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden. 1990. Iss. 30. P. 85-94.
  18. Kaelin E. F. Debate over Stratification within Aesthetic Objects // Analecta Husserliana. Ingardeniana II. New Studies in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden. 1990. Iss. 30. P. 123-138.
  19. Merleau-Ponty M. La prose du monde. P.: Gaillimard, 1969. 232 r.
  20. Mitscherling J. Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1997. 245 p.
  21. Nyenhuis G. Roman Ingarden’s Contribution to the Reading and Analysis of the Literary Text // Analecta Husserliana. Ingardeniana II. New Studies in the Philosophy of Roman Ingarden. 1990. Iss. 30. P. 95-106.
  22. Richard S. Sur un d?bat qui n’a pas eu lieu: approche ingard?nienne contre approche meinongienne des objets fictifs // Slavica Bruxellensia. Revue polyphonique de litterature, culture et histoire slaves. 2015. Iss. 11. R. 1-14.
  23. Rudnick H. H. Roman Ingarden’s Literary Theory // Analecta Husserliana. 1983. Iss. 4. R. 105-119.
Procedure of Scientific Articles Publication | To Show Issue Content | To Show All Articles in Section | Subject Index

© 2006-2024 GRAMOTA Publishers

site development and search engine optimization (seo): krav.ru