Specificity of Concept Formation in Social Sciences and the Humanities: Modern Paradigm
Guseva Irina Ivanovna
Leonov Moscow Region University of Technology
Submitted: 25.02.2021
Abstract. The paper aims to reveal specificity of formation and functioning of social and humanities concepts in the context of modern scientific rationality. The article examines correlation of the concepts dynamics and dynamics of disciplinary structure of social sciences and the humanities, processes of knowledge institutionalization; shows influence of interdisciplinarity on the concept formation; describes means of conceptualization in modern practically oriented humanities studies; analyses refusal from logical fetishism as an efficient means to destroy social and humanities concepts. Scientific originality of the study lies in the fact that the author analyses the concepts representing individual sociality by the material of micro-history. As a result, it is shown that in social sciences and the humanities focused on studying a particular social or cultural phenomenon, the concept formation occurs not through generalization and typification but through construction of a social micro-world on the basis of personal, professional, cultural experience of a humanitarian, and their intuition plays a key role in choosing a research subject.
Key words and phrases: понятия социально-гуманитарных наук, методология социально-гуманитарных наук, индивидуальные форматы социального, междисциплинарность, микроистория, social and humanities concepts, methodology of social sciences and the humanities, individual formats of the social, interdisciplinarity, micro-history
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Azhimov F. E. Germenevtika kak metafizika (narratologicheskie aspekty interpretatsii) // Voprosy filosofii. 2019. № 12. S. 5-9.
Astaf'eva O. N., Razlogov K. E. Kul'turologiya: predmet i struktura [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://cr-journal.ru/rus/journals/2.html&j_id%3D2 (data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2021).
Ginzburg K. Mify - emblemy - primety: morfologiya i istoriya: sbornik statei / per. s it. i poslesl. S. L. Kozlova. M.: Novoe izd-vo, 2003. 348 s.
Ginzburg K. Predislovie k knige "Syr i chervi" // Sovremennye metody prepodavaniya noveishei istorii: materialy iz tsikla seminarov pri podderzhke Democracy Programme TACIS: sbornik statei / per. M. P. Aizenshtadt, B. T. Kabanov, A. A. Kirillina i dr.; redkol. A. O. Chubar'yan, F. Gori, A. Romano i dr.; Evrop. un-t (M., Rossiya); Fond Fel'trinelli (Milan, Italiya). M.: IVI RAN, 1996. S. 40-53.
Ginzburg K. Shiroty, raby i Bibliya: opyt mikroistorii // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2004. № 1 (65). S. 18-34.
Guseva I. I. Biografiya i avtobiografiya kak zhanry istoricheskogo issledovaniya // Nauka i obshchestvo. 2013. № 1 (10). S. 26-30.
Kagan M. S. O khode istorii. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2004. 704 s.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya Prosveshcheniya / per. s nem. M.: ROSSPEN, 2004. 400 s.
Kemerov V. E. Krizis, kotoryi vsegda s toboi // Voprosy filosofii. 2018. № 6. S. 89-98.
Mikeshina L. A. Sovremennaya epistemologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya: mezhdistsiplinarnye sintezy. M.: ROSSPEN, 2016. 463 s.
Fuks-Khainritts V. Biograficheskii metod // Biograficheskii metod v sotsiologii: istoriya, metodologiya, praktika. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 1994. S. 11-41.
Shchedrina T. G. Problema ponimaniya istoricheskoi real'nosti (metodologicheskii opyt Gustava Shpeta) // Voprosy filosofii. 2018. № 12. S. 90-93.
Русский
