Methodological and Ontological Foundations of Fear Heuristics in H. Jonas’s Ethics
Pugacheva Natal'ya Petrovna
Penza State Agrarian University
Submitted: 14.03.2020
Abstract. The article examines the principle of fear heuristics suggested more than forty years ago by the modern thinker Hans Jonas as a methodology of scientific search and an ethical guideline in the human’s everyday ethical practice: preserving human identity requires efforts. In Jonas’s conception of responsibility, fear becomes a value-forming principle and is endowed with the heuristic function, the foundation of responsibility, contrary to traditional ethical conceptions, which considered fear an affect hampering the mind. Contrary to previous studies, Jonas’s conception is examined not only on the basis of the well-known work "The Principle of Responsibility" but taking into account his biographical facts and little known studies.
Key words and phrases: Ганс Йонас, страх, эвристика страха, этика ответственности, сравнительная футурология, глобальные катастрофы, будущее, прогноз, Hans Jonas, fear, fear heuristics, ethics of responsibility, comparative futurology, global disasters, future, forecast
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Gadzhikurbanova P. A. Strakh i otvetstvennost': etika tekhnologicheskoi tsivilizatsii Gansa Ionasa // Eticheskaya mysl'. 2003. № 4. S. 161-178.
Ermolenko A. N. Etika otvetstvennosti i sotsial'noe bytie cheloveka. K.: Naukova dumka, 1994. 200 s.
Ionas G. Printsip otvetstvennosti. Opyt etiki dlya tekhnologicheskoi tsivilizatsii / per. s nem. I. I. Makhan'kova. M.: Airis-press, 2004. 480 c.
Mishatkina T., Tishchenko P. Biobezopasnost' v obshchestve global'nogo ekologicheskogo riska: eticheskii aspekt // Sakharovskie chteniya 2019 goda: ekologicheskie problemy XXI veka: materialy 19-i Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Minsk, Respublika Belarus', 23-24 maya 2019 g.): v 3-kh ch. / MGEI im. A. D. Sakharova BGU; redkol.: A. N. Batyan i dr.; pod red. S. A. Maskevicha, S. S. Poznyaka. Mn.: IVTs Minfina, 2019. Ch. 1. S. 39-42.
Platonova A. V. Sub"ekty moral'nogo soznaniya v sovremennom obshchestve: o tipakh kollektivnoi otvetstvennosti // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 373. S. 75-79.
Platonova A. V. Evristicheskaya funktsiya strakha v ontologicheskoi kontseptsii otvetstvennosti Gansa Ionasa // Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty sovremennoi nauki. 2015. № 9-4. S. 73-77.
Tishchenko P. D. Bioetika, obshchestvo riska i evristika vyzova // Filosofskie nauki. 2010. № 12. S. 42-49.
Tishchenko P. D. Ionas // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4-kh t. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 2.
Herausforderung Zukunftverantwortung. Hans Jonas zu Ehren / hrsg. von D. Boehler, R. Neuberth. Muenster - Hamburg: Lit, 1992. 130 S.
Jonas H. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik fuer die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984. 432 S.
Jonas H. Technik, Freiheit und Pflicht // Jonas H. Wissenschaft als persoenliches Erlebnis. Goettingen: Vandenboeck u. Ruprecht, 1987. S. 32-46.
Orientierung und Verantwortung. Begegnungen und Auseinandersetzungen mit Hans Jonas / hrsg. von D. Boehler, J. P. Brune. Wuerzburg: K?nigshausen & Neuman, 2004. 538 S.
Science Fiction. English and American Short Stories. M.: Progress, 1979. 348 c.
Русский
