Narratological Approach to F. Fukuyama’s "The End of History" Conception
Maslov Evgenii Sergeevich
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Submitted: 15.12.2019
Abstract. The article considers "the end of history" conception developed by the outstanding modern political scientist and philosopher Francis Fukuyama. The study is based on narratological notions, conceptions and methods. Fukuyama’s model of global historical process is subjected to a narratological analysis. The researcher’s attention is focused on the story structure and the story conflict. The research findings allow revealing contradiction between the notion "the end of history" and actual incompleteness of historical process. The conclusions are extrapolated to other philosophical and historical conceptions containing "the end of history" notion.
Key words and phrases: Фукуяма, Гегель, Тодоров, конец истории, конфликт, сюжет, философия истории, F. Fukuyama, G. W. Hegel, T. Todorov, end of history, conflict, story, philosophy of history
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Aristotel'. Ritorika. Poetika. M.: Labirint, 2004. 224 s.
Gegel' G. V. F. Lektsii po filosofii istorii. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. 480 s.
Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk: v 3-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1974-1977.
Gegel' G. V. F. Estetika: v 4-kh t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1968. T. 1. 312 s.
Kapkov S. S. Prodolzhaetsya li istoriya? (kritika kontseptsii "kontsa istorii" Fukuyamy) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Filosofiya. Kul'turologiya. Politologiya. Pravo. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2008. № 4. S. 311-318.
Kukartseva M. A. Lingvisticheskii povorot v istoriopisanii: evolyutsiya, sushchnost' i osnovnye printsipy // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. № 4. S. 44-55.
Luk'yanov V. Yu. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii ili konets istorii? Teorii S. Khantingtona i F. Fukuyamy v XXI veke // Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i upravleniya. 2016. № 4 (12). S. 126-133.
Potapova N. D. Lingvisticheskii povorot v istoriografii. SPb.: Izd-vo Evropeiskogo un-ta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2015. 380 s.
Riker P. Vremya i rasskaz: v 2-kh t. M. - SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. T. 1. Intriga i istoricheskii rasskaz. 313 s.
Todorov Tsv. Poetika // Strukturalizm: "za" i "protiv": sbornik statei. M.: Progress, 1975. S. 37-113.
Tomashevskii B. V. Teoriya literatury. Poetika. M.: Aspekt Press, 1999. 334 s.
Uait Kh. Metaistoriya: istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope KhIKh v. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo un-ta, 2002. 528 s.
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek. M.: AST; AST MOSKVA; Poligrafizdat, 2010. 588 s.
Khalizev V. E. Teoriya literatury. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1999. 398 s.
El'darion A. A. "Narrativnyi povorot" v sovremennoi filosofii istorii: problemy i perspektivy // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. № 3 (77). Ch. 2. C. 209-212.
Carr D. Time, Narrative and History. Bloomington - Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1986. 189 p.
Coker C. Francis Fukuyama and the End of History // Kantian Review. 2017. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. P. 172-176.
Herman D. Basic Elements of Narrative. Chichester - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 249 p.
M?ller J. Did History End? Assessing the Fukuyama Thesis // Political Science Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 129. Iss. 1. P. 35-54.
Русский
