PHILOSOPHICAL IMAGE OF CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL SCIENCE: CHANGE OF KEY METAPHORS
Martishina Natal’ya Ivanovna, Akishina Elena Olegovna
Siberian Transport University
Submitted: 16.06.2019
Abstract. The article considers the expression of the generalized philosophical image of science in various periods of its development through the key metaphors used by philosophers to describe scientific cognition. The authors believe that this way it is possible to trace both the change in the character of science itself during the transition from the classical to the non-classical stage of its development, and the change in the paradigm of philosophy of science. The main lines of changes are transitions from reality reflection metaphors to metaphors of new reality construction and from free game metaphors to metaphors of work carried out in the organizational forms of production activity.
Key words and phrases: философия науки, метафора, философский образ науки, этапы развития науки, познание как отражение и конструирование, philosophy of science, metaphor, philosophical image of science, stages of science development, cognition as reflection and construction
Open the whole article in PDF format. Free PDF-files viewer can be downloaded .
References:
Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoriya i praktika. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2007. 592 s.
Blek M. Metafora // Teoriya metafory: sbornik / per. s angl., fr., nem., isp., pol'sk. yaz. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 153-172.
Bekon F. Novyi Organon // Bekon F. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. S. 5-214.
Bekon F. O mudrosti drevnikh // Bekon F. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. S. 231-299.
Bekon F. Opyty, ili Nastavleniya nravstvennye i politicheskie // Bekon F. Sochineniya: v 2-kh t. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. S. 349-480.
Martishina N. I. Konstruktivistskaya issledovatel'skaya programma v sotsial'no-gumanitarnom znanii // Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2015. № 2 (6). S. 19-23.
Myakishev G. Ya. Nauka i paranauka // Problema tsennostnogo statusa nauki na rubezhe XXI v. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGI, 1999. S. 223-242.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Dve velikie metafory // Teoriya metafory: sbornik / per. s angl., fr., nem., isp., pol'sk. yaz. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 68-81.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Pochemu my vnov' prishli k filosofii? // Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva i drugie raboty: esse o literature i iskusstve: sbornik / per. s isp. M.: Raduga, 1991. S. 9-39.
Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Chelovek i lyudi // Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Degumanizatsiya iskusstva i drugie raboty: esse o literature i iskusstve: sbornik / per. s isp. M.: Raduga, 1991. S. 229-476.
Rassel B. Chelovecheskoe poznanie: ego sfera i granitsy / per. s angl. K.: Nika-Tsentr, 2001. 560 s.
Sapunov M. B. O probleme real'nosti v istorii i filosofii nauki // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2012. № 2. S. 147-155.
Khaidegger M. Vremya kartiny mira // Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: stat'i i vystupleniya / per. s nem. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 41-62.
Wynne B. Knowledge in Context // Science, Technology and Human Values. Cambridge (Mass.), 1991. P. 111-121.
Русский
